Eulerian and Lagrangian electron energisation during magnetic reconnection

Journal of Plasma Physics Cambridge University Press (CUP) 91:3 (2025) E90

Authors:

Konrad Steinvall, Louis Richard, Tünde Fülöp, Lise Hanebring, István Pusztai

Abstract:

Electron energisation by magnetic reconnection has historically been studied in the Lagrangian guiding-centre framework. Insights from such studies include that Fermi acceleration in magnetic islands can accelerate electrons to high energies. An alternative Eulerian fluid formulation of electron energisation was recently used to study electron energisation during magnetic reconnection in the absence of magnetic islands. Here, we use particle-in-cell simulations to compare the Eulerian and Lagrangian models of electron energisation in a set-up where reconnection leads to magnetic island formation. We find the largest energisation at the edges of magnetic islands. There, energisation related to the diamagnetic drift dominates in the Eulerian model, while the Fermi related term dominates in the Lagrangian model. The models predict significantly different energisation rates locally. A better agreement is found after integrating over the simulation domain. We show that strong magnetic curvature can break the magnetic moment conservation assumed by the Lagrangian model, leading to erroneous results. The Eulerian fluid model is a complete fluid description and accurately models bulk energisation. However, local measurements of its constituent energisation terms need not reflect locations where plasma is heated or accelerated. The Lagrangian guiding centre model can accurately describe the energisation of particles, but it cannot describe the evolution of the fluid energy. We conclude that while both models can be valid, they describe two fundamentally different quantities, and care should be taken when choosing which model to use.

Measuring the beamlet divergence in NBI systems for fusion: A diagnostic comparison

Fusion Engineering and Design Elsevier 215 (2025) 114951

Authors:

Niek den Harder, Michael Barnes, Andreas Döring, Bernd Heinemann, Bruno Laterza, Isabella Mario, Antonio Pimazzoni, Carlo Poggi, Alessandro La Rosa, Emanuele Sartori, Beatrice Segalini, Gianluigi Serianni, Alastair Shepherd, Christian Wimmer, Dirk Wünderlich, Ursel Fantz

Hydrodynamic simulations of black hole evolution in AGN discs II: inclination damping for partially embedded satellites

(2025)

Authors:

Henry Whitehead, Connar Rowan, Bence Kocsis

Hydrodynamic simulations of black hole evolution in AGN discs I: orbital alignment of highly inclined satellites

(2025)

Authors:

Connar Rowan, Henry Whitehead, Gaia Fabj, Philip Kirkeberg, Martin E Pessah, Bence Kocsis

Detection prospects for the GW background of galactic (sub)solar mass primordial black holes

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics IOP Publishing 2025:05 (2025) 036

Authors:

Frans van Die, Ivan Rapoport, Yonadav Barry Ginat, Vincent Desjacques

Abstract:

In multi-component dark matter models, a fraction f pbh of the dark matter could be in the form of primordial black holes (PBHs) with (sub)solar masses. Some would have formed binaries that presently trace the Milky Way halo of particle dark matter. We explore the gravitational wave (GW) signal produced by such a hypothetical population of Galactic PBH binaries and assess its detectability by the LISA experiment. For this purpose, we model the formation and evolution of early-type PBH binaries accounting for GW hardening and binary disruption in the Milky Way. Our analysis reveals that the present-day Galactic population of PBH binaries is characterized by very high orbital eccentricities |1-e| ≪ 1. For a PBH mass M pbh ∼ 0.1 - 1M ⊙, this yields a GW background that peaks in the millihertz frequency range where the LISA instrumental noise is minimum. While this signal remains below the LISA detection threshold for viable f pbh ≲ 0.01, future GW observatories such as DECIGO and BBO could detect it if 0.01 ≲ M pbh ≲ 0.1M ⊙. Furthermore, we anticipate that, after 5 years of observations, LISA should be able to detect 𝒪(100) (resp. 𝒪(1)) loud Galactic PBH binaries of mass M pbh ≲ 0.1 - 1M ⊙ with a SNR ≥ 5 if f pbh = 0.01 (resp. f pbh = 0.001). Nonlinear effects not considered here such as mass accretion and dynamical capture could alter these predictions.