Identification of Galaxy–Galaxy Strong Lens Candidates in the DECam Local Volume Exploration Survey Using Machine Learning

The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 954:1 (2023) 68-68

Authors:

EA Zaborowski, A Drlica-Wagner, F Ashmead, JF Wu, R Morgan, CR Bom, AJ Shajib, S Birrer, W Cerny, EJ Buckley-Geer, B Mutlu-Pakdil, PS Ferguson, K Glazebrook, SJ Gonzalez Lozano, Y Gordon, M Martinez, V Manwadkar, J O’Donnell, J Poh, A Riley, JD Sakowska, L Santana-Silva, BX Santiago, D Sluse, CY Tan, A Verma

Abstract:

Artículo escrito por un elevado número de autores, solo se referencian el que aparece en primer lugar, el nombre del grupo de colaboración, si le hubiere, y los autores pertenecientes a la UAMWe perform a search for galaxy-galaxy strong lens systems using a convolutional neural network (CNN) applied to imaging data from the first public data release of the DECam Local Volume Exploration Survey, which contains 1/4520 million astronomical sources covering 1/44000 deg2 of the southern sky to a 5σ point-source depth of g = 24.3, r = 23.9, i = 23.3, and z = 22.8 mag. Following the methodology of similar searches using Dark Energy Camera data, we apply color and magnitude cuts to select a catalog of 1/411 million extended astronomical sources. After scoring with our CNN, the highest-scoring 50,000 images were visually inspected and assigned a score on a scale from 0 (not a lens) to 3 (very probable lens). We present a list of 581 strong lens candidates, 562 of which are previously unreported. We categorize our candidates using their human-assigned scores, resulting in 55 Grade A candidates, 149 Grade B candidates, and 377 Grade C candidates. We additionally highlight eight potential quadruply lensed quasars from this sample. Due to the location of our search footprint in the northern Galactic cap (b > 10 deg) and southern celestial hemisphere (decl. < 0 deg), our candidate list has little overlap with other existing ground-based searches. Where our search footprint does overlap with other searches, we find a significant number of high-quality candidates that were previously unidentified, indicating a degree of orthogonality in our methodology. We report properties of our candidates including apparent magnitude and Einstein radius estimated from the image separation

A Radio Flare in the Long-Lived Afterglow of the Distant Short GRB 210726A: Energy Injection or a Reverse Shock from Shell Collisions?

(2023)

Authors:

Genevieve Schroeder, Lauren Rhodes, Tanmoy Laskar, Anya Nugent, Alicia Rouco Escorial, Jillian C Rastinejad, Wen-fai Fong, Alexander J van der Horst, Péter Veres, Kate D Alexander, Alex Andersson, Edo Berger, Peter K Blanchard, Sarah Chastain, Lise Christensen, Rob Fender, David A Green, Paul Groot, Ian Heywood, Assaf Horesh, Luca Izzo, Charles D Kilpatrick, Elmar Körding, Amy Lien, Daniele B Malesani, Vanessa McBride, Kunal Mooley, Antonia Rowlinson, Huei Sears, Ben Stappers, Nial Tanvir, Susanna D Vergani, Ralph AMJ Wijers, David Williams-Baldwin, Patrick Woudt

On the detectability of strong lensing in near-infrared surveys

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) 525:2 (2023) 2341-2354

Authors:

Philip Holloway, Aprajita Verma, Philip J Marshall, Anupreeta More, Matthias Tecza

The Galactic Interstellar Object Population: A Framework for Prediction and Inference

(2023)

Authors:

Matthew J Hopkins, Chris Lintott, Michele T Bannister, J Ted Mackereth, John C Forbes

A massive quiescent galaxy at redshift 4.658

Nature Springer Nature 619:7971 (2023) 716-719

Authors:

Adam C Carnall, Ross J McLure, James S Dunlop, Derek J McLeod, Vivienne Wild, Fergus Cullen, Dan Magee, Ryan Begley, Andrea Cimatti, Callum T Donnan, Massissilia L Hamadouche, Sophie M Jewell, Sam Walker