Euclid : Quick Data Release (Q1) – Photometric studies of known transients

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 711 (2025) A38-A38

Authors:

C Duffy, E Cappellaro, MT Botticella, IM Hook, F Poidevin, TJ Moriya, AA Chrimes, V Petrecca, K Paterson, A Goobar, L Galbany, R Kotak, C Gall, CM Gutierrez, C Tao, L Izzo, N Aghanim, B Altieri, A Amara, S Andreon, N Auricchio, C Baccigalupi, M Baldi, A Balestra, S Bardelli

Abstract:

We report on serendipitous Euclid observations of previously known transients, using the Euclid Q1 data release. By cross-matching with the Transient Name Server (TNS) we identify 164 transients that coincide with the data release. Although the Euclid Q1 release only includes single-epoch data, we are able to make Euclid photometric measurements at the location of 161 of these transients where 67 had a significant flux measurement in at least one band . Euclid obtained deep photometric measurements or upper limits of these transients in the and bands at various phases of the transient light curves, including before, during, and after the observations of ground-based transient surveys. Approximately 70% of known transients reported in the six months before the Euclid observation date and with a discovery magnitude brighter than 24 were detected in Euclid IE images. Our observations include one of the earliest near-infrared detections of a Type Ia supernova (SN 2024pvw) 15 days prior to its peak brightness, and the late-phase (435.9 days post peak) observations of the enigmatic core-collapse SN 2023aew. Euclid deep photometry provides valuable information on the nature of these transients such as their progenitor systems and power with late-time observations being a uniquely powerful contribution . In addition, Euclid is able to detect the host galaxies of some transients that were previously classed as hostless. The Q1 data demonstrate the power of the Euclid data even with only single-epoch observations available, as will be the case for much larger areas of sky in the Euclid Wide Survey

Euclid: Early Release Observations The intracluster light of Abell 2390

Astronomy and Astrophysics 698 (2025)

Authors:

A Ellien, M Montes, SL Ahad, P Dimauro, JB Golden-Marx, Y Jimenez-Teja, F Durret, C Bellhouse, JM Diego, SP Bamford, AH Gonzalez, NA Hatch, M Kluge, R Ragusa, E Slezak, JC Cuillandre, R Gavazzi, H Dole, G Mahler, G Congedo, T Saifollahi, N Aghanim, B Altieri, A Amara, S Andreon, N Auricchio, C Baccigalupi, M Baldi, A Balestra, S Bardelli, A Basset, P Battaglia, A Biviano, A Bonchi, D Bonino, E Branchini, M Brescia, J Brinchmann, A Caillat, S Camera, V Capobianco, C Carbone, VF Cardone, J Carretero, S Casas, M Castellano, G Castignani, S Cavuoti, A Cimatti, C Colodro-Conde, CJ Conselice, L Conversi, Y Copin, F Courbin, HM Courtois, M Cropper, AD Silva, H Degaudenzi, G De Lucia, AMD Giorgio, J Dinis, F Dubath, CAJ Duncan, X Dupac, S Dusini, M Farina, F Faustini, S Ferriol, S Fotopoulou, M Frailis, E Franceschi, S Galeotta, K George, B Gillis, C Giocoli, P Gómez-Alvarez, A Grazian, F Grupp, L Guzzo, SVH Haugan, J Hoar, H Hoekstra, W Holmes, F Hormuth, A Hornstrup, P Hudelot, K Jahnke, M Jhabvala, B Joachimi, E Keihänen, S Kermiche, A Kiessling, B Kubik, K Kuijken, M Kümmel, M Kunz, H Kurki-Suonio, R Laureijs, D Le Mignant, S Ligori

Abstract:

Intracluster light (ICL) provides a record of the dynamical interactions undergone by clusters, giving clues on cluster formation and evolution. Here, we analyse the properties of ICL in the massive cluster Abell 2390 at redshift z = 0.228. Our analysis is based on the deep images obtained by the Euclid mission as part of the Early Release Observations in the near-infrared (YE, JE, HE bands), using the NISP instrument in a 0.75 deg2 field. We subtracted a point–spread function (PSF) model and removed the Galactic cirrus contribution in each band after modelling it with the DAWIS software. We then applied three methods to detect, characterise, and model the ICL and the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG): the CICLE 2D multi-galaxy fitting; the DAWIS wavelet-based multiscale software; and a mask-based 1D profile fitting. We detect ICL out to 600 kpc. The ICL fractions derived by our three methods range between 18% and 36% (average of 24%), while the BCG+ICL fractions are between 21% and 41% (average of 29%), depending on the band and method. A galaxy density map based on 219 selected cluster members shows a strong cluster substructure to the south-east and a smaller feature to the north-west. Ellipticals dominate the cluster’s central region, with a centroid offset from the BCG by about 70 kpc and distribution following that of the ICL, while spirals do not trace the entire ICL but rather substructures. The comparison of the BCG+ICL, mass from gravitational lensing, and X-ray maps show that the BCG+ICL is the best tracer of substructures in the cluster. Based on colours, the ICL (out to about 400 kpc) seems to be built by the accretion of small systems (M ∼ 109.5 M ), or from stars coming from the outskirts of Milky Way-type galaxies (M ∼ 1010 M ). Though Abell 2390 does not seem to be undergoing a merger, it is not yet fully relaxed, since it has accreted two groups that have not fully merged with the cluster core. We estimate that the contributions to the inner 300 kpc of the ICL of the north-west and south-east subgroups are 21% and 9%, respectively.

Euclid preparation

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 698 (2025) ARTN A14

Authors:

C Bellhouse, Jb Golden-Marx, Sp Bamford, Na Hatch, M Kluge, A Ellien, Sl Ahad, P Dimauro, F Durret, Ah Gonzalez, Y Jimenez-Teja, M Montes, M Sereno, E Slezak, M Bolzonella, G Castignani, O Cucciati, G De Lucia, Z Ghaffari, L Moscardini, R Pello, L Pozzetti, T Saifollahi, As Borlaff, N Aghanim, B Altieri, A Amara, S Andreon, C Baccigalupi, M Baldi, S Bardelli, A Basset, P Battaglia, R Bender, D Bonino, E Branchini, M Brescia, A Caillat, S Camera, V Capobianco, C Carbone, Vf Cardone, J Carretero, S Casas, M Castellano, S Cavuoti, A Cimatti, C Colodro-Conde, G Congedo, Cj Conselice

Abstract:

The intracluster light (ICL) permeating galaxy clusters is a tracer of the cluster assembly history and potentially a tracer of their dark matter structure. In this work, we explore the capability of the Euclid Wide Survey to detect ICL using HE-band mock images. We simulated clusters across a range of redshifts (0.3-1.8) and halo masses (1013:9-1015:0 M_) using an observationally motivated model of ICL. We identified a 50- 200 kpc circular annulus around the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) in which the signal-to-noise ratio of the ICL is maximised and used the S/N within this aperture as our figure of merit for ICL detection.We compared three state-of-the-art methods for ICL detection and found that a method that performs simple aperture photometry after high-surface brightness source masking is able to detect ICL with minimal bias for clusters more massive than 1014:2 M_. The S/N of the ICL detection is primarily limited by the redshift of the cluster, which is driven by cosmological dimming rather than the mass of the cluster. Assuming the ICL in each cluster contains 15% of the stellar light, we forecast that Euclid will be able to measure the presence of ICL in up to _80 000 clusters of >1014:2 M_ between z = 0:3 and 1.5 with an S/N > 3. Half of these clusters will reside below z = 0:75, and the majority of those below z = 0:6 will be detected with an S/N > 20. A few thousand clusters at 1:3 < z < 1:5 will have ICL detectable with an S/N > 3. The surface brightness profile of the ICL model is strongly dependent on both the mass of the cluster and the redshift at which it is observed so that the outer ICL is best observed in the most massive clusters of >1014:7 M_. Euclid will detect the ICL at a distance of more than 500 kpc from the BCG, up to z = 0:7, in several hundred of these massive clusters over its large survey volume.

Cross-correlating the EMU Pilot Survey 1 with CMB lensing: Constraints on cosmology and galaxy bias with harmonic-space power spectra

Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia Cambridge University Press 42 (2025) e062

Authors:

Konstantinos Tanidis, Jacobo Asorey, Chandra Shekhar Saraf, Catherine Laura Hale, Benedict Bahr-Kalus, David Parkinson, Stefano Camera, Ray Norris, Andrew Hopkins, Maciej Bilicki, Nikhel Gupta

Abstract:

We measured the harmonic-space power spectrum of Galaxy clustering auto-correlation from the Evolutionary Map of the Universe Pilot Survey 1 data (EMU PS1) and its cross-correlation with the lensing convergence map of cosmic microwave background (CMB) from Planck Public Release 4 at the linear scale range from to 500. We applied two flux density cuts at and mJy on the radio galaxies observed at 944MHz and considered two source detection algorithms. We found the auto-correlation measurements from the two algorithms at the 0.18 mJy cut to deviate for due to the different criteria assumed on the source detection and decided to ignore data above this scale. We report a cross-correlation detection of EMU PS1 with CMB lensing at 5.5 , irrespective of flux density cut. In our theoretical modelling we considered the SKADS and T-RECS redshift distribution simulation models that yield consistent results, a linear and a non-linear matter power spectrum, and two linear galaxy bias models. That is a constant redshift-independent galaxy bias and a constant amplitude galaxy bias . By fixing a cosmology model and considering a non-linear matter power spectrum with SKADS, we measured a constant galaxy bias at mJy ( mJy) with ( ) and a constant amplitude bias with ( ). When is a free parameter for the same models at mJy ( mJy) with the constant model we found ( ), while with the constant amplitude model we measured ( ), respectively. Our results agree at with the measurements from Planck CMB and the weak lensing surveys and also show the potential of cosmology studies with future radio continuum survey data.

EMU: Cross-correlating EMU Pilot Survey 1 with Dark Energy Survey to validate the radio galaxy bias and redshift distribution

ArXiv 2505.05821 (2025)

Authors:

Chandra Shekhar Saraf, David Parkinson, Jacobo Asorey, Catherine L Hale, Benedict Bahr-Kalus, Maciej Bilicki, Stefano Camera, Andrew M Hopkins, Konstantinos Tanidis