Extreme exospheric dynamics at Charon: Implications for the red spot

Geophysical Research Letters Wiley 49:8 (2022) e2021GL097580

Authors:

B Teolis, U Raut, Ja Kammer, Cj Gimar, Cja Howett, Gr Gladstone, Kd Retherford

Abstract:

Charon's exosphere may exhibit extreme seasonal dynamics, with centuries of quiescence punctuated by short lived (∼4 earth years) exospheric surges near the equinoxes, as spring sunrise bi-annually drives frozen methane off the polar night zones. Charon's pole-centric red spot has been proposed to be the product of Ly-α photolysis of frozen methane into refractory hydrocarbon “tholins”, but the role of exospheric dynamics in the red material's formation has not been investigated. We show with exospheric modeling that methane “polar-swap”, in which exospheric CH4 sublimated from the spring polar zone is rapidly re-frozen onto the autumn hemisphere, deposits ∼30 μm polar frosts too thick for Ly-α light to penetrate. Ethane, the primary methane photoproduct under these conditions, may unlike methane remain frozen decades after polar sunrise under solar wind exposure. Solar wind radiolysis of polar ethane frost synthesizes higher-order refractories that may contribute to the coloration of Charon's polar zones.

Subseasonal Variation in Neptune’s Mid-infrared Emission

The Planetary Science Journal American Astronomical Society 3:4 (2022) 78-78

Authors:

Michael T Roman, Leigh N Fletcher, Glenn S Orton, Thomas K Greathouse, Julianne I Moses, Naomi Rowe-Gurney, Patrick GJ Irwin, Arrate Antuñano, James Sinclair, Yasumasa Kasaba, Takuya Fujiyoshi, Imke de Pater, Heidi B Hammel

Abstract:

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>We present an analysis of all currently available ground-based imaging of Neptune in the mid-infrared. Dating between 2003 and 2020, the images reveal changes in Neptune’s mid-infrared (∼8–25 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m) emission over time in the years surrounding Neptune’s 2005 southern summer solstice. Images sensitive to stratospheric ethane (∼12 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m), methane (∼8 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m), and CH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>D (∼9 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m) display significant subseasonal temporal variation on regional and global scales. Comparison with H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> S(1) hydrogen quadrupole (∼17.035 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m) spectra suggests that these changes are primarily related to stratospheric temperature changes. The stratosphere appears to have cooled between 2003 and 2009 across multiple filtered wavelengths, followed by a dramatic warming of the south pole between 2018 and 2020. Conversely, upper-tropospheric temperatures—inferred from ∼17 to 25 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m imaging—appear invariant during this period, except for the south pole, which appeared warmest between 2003 and 2006. We discuss the observed variability in the context of seasonal forcing, tropospheric meteorology, and the solar cycle. Collectively, these data provide the strongest evidence to date that processes produce subseasonal variation on both global and regional scales in Neptune’s stratosphere.</jats:p>

Mid-Infrared Observations of Neptune and Uranus: Recent Discoveries and Future Opportunities

Copernicus Publications (2022)

Authors:

Michael T Roman, Leigh N Fletcher, Glenn S Orton, Thomas K Greathouse, Julianne Moses, Naomi Rowe-Gurney, Patrick GJ Irwin, Yasumasa Kasaba, Takuya Fujiyoshi, Heidi B Hammel, Imke de Pater, James Sinclair, Arrate Antuñano

Temporal variations in spectral reflectivity and vertical cloud structure of Jupiter’s Great Red Spot and its surroundings

Copernicus Publications (2022)

Authors:

Asier Anguiano-Arteaga, Santiago Pérez-Hoyos, Agustín Sánchez-Lavega, Patrick Irwin

Hypotheses for Triton's plumes: New analyses and future remote sensing tests

Icarus 375 (2022)

Authors:

JD Hofgartner, SPD Birch, J Castillo, WM Grundy, CJ Hansen, AG Hayes, CJA Howett, TA Hurford, ES Martin, KL Mitchell, TA Nordheim, MJ Poston, LM Prockter, LC Quick, P Schenk, RN Schindhelm, OM Umurhan

Abstract:

At least two active plumes were observed on Neptune's moon Triton during the Voyager 2 flyby in 1989. Models for Triton's plumes have previously been grouped into five hypotheses, two of which are primarily atmospheric phenomena and are generally considered unlikely, and three of which include eruptive processes and are plausible. These hypotheses are compared, including new arguments, such as comparisons based on current understanding of Mars, Enceladus, and Pluto. An eruption model based on a solar-powered, solid-state greenhouse effect was previously considered the leading hypothesis for Triton's plumes, in part due to the proximity of the plumes to the subsolar latitude during the Voyager 2 flyby and the distribution of Triton's fans that are putatively deposits from former plumes. The other two eruption hypotheses are powered by internal heat, not solar insolation. Based on new analyses of the ostensible relation between the latitude of the subsolar point on Triton and the geographic locations of the plumes and fans, we argue that neither the locations of the plumes nor fans are strong evidence in favor of the solar-powered hypothesis. We conclude that all three eruption hypotheses should be considered further. Five tests are presented that could be implemented with remote sensing observations from future spacecraft to confidently distinguish among the eruption hypotheses for Triton's plumes. The five tests are based on the: (1) composition and thickness of Triton's southern hemisphere terrains, (2) composition of fan deposits, (3) distribution of active plumes, (4) distribution of fans, and (5) surface temperature at the locations of plumes and/or fans. The tests are independent, but complementary, and implementable with a single flyby mission such as the Trident mission concept. We note that, in the case of the solar-driven hypothesis, the 2030s and 2040s may be the last chance for approximately a century to observe actively erupting plumes on Triton.