The Double Tidal Disruption Event AT 2022dbl Implies that at Least Some “Standard” Optical Tidal Disruption Events Are Partial Disruptions

The Astrophysical Journal Letters American Astronomical Society 987:1 (2025) L20

Authors:

Lydia Makrygianni, Iair Arcavi, Megan Newsome, Ananya Bandopadhyay, Eric R Coughlin, Itai Linial, Brenna Mockler, Eliot Quataert, Chris Nixon, Benjamin Godson, Miika Pursiainen, Giorgos Leloudas, K Decker French, Adi Zitrin, Sara Faris, Marco C Lam, Assaf Horesh, Itai Sfaradi, Michael Fausnaugh, Ehud Nakar, Kendall Ackley, Moira Andrews, Panos Charalampopoulos, Benjamin DR Davies, Rob Fender, Lauren Rhodes

Abstract:

Flares produced following the tidal disruption of stars by supermassive black holes can reveal the properties of the otherwise dormant majority of black holes and the physics of accretion. In the past decade, a class of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption flares has been discovered whose emission properties do not match theoretical predictions. This has led to extensive efforts to model the dynamics and emission mechanisms of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruptions in order to establish them as probes of supermassive black holes. Here we present the optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption event AT 2022dbl, which showed a nearly identical repetition 700 days after the first flare. Ruling out gravitational lensing and two chance unrelated disruptions, we conclude that at least the first flare represents the partial disruption of a star, possibly captured through the Hills mechanism. Since both flares are typical of the optical-ultraviolet class of tidal disruptions in terms of their radiated energy, temperature, luminosity, and spectral features, it follows that either the entire class are partial rather than full stellar disruptions, contrary to the prevalent assumption, or some members of the class are partial disruptions, having nearly the same observational characteristics as full disruptions. Whichever option is true, these findings could require revised models for the emission mechanisms of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption flares and a reassessment of their expected rates.

Are FRBs emitted from rotating magnetospheres? Searching for periodicity in polarized bursts

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters Oxford University Press 542:1 (2025) L43-L47

Authors:

KM Rajwade, A Karastergiou

Abstract:

One of the potential sources of repeating fast radio bursts (FRBs) is a rotating magnetosphere of a compact object, as suggested by the similarities in the polarization properties of FRBs and radio pulsars. Attempts to measure an underlying period in the times of arrival of repeating FRBs have nevertheless been unsuccessful. To explain this lack of observed periodicity, it is often suggested that the line of sight towards the source must be sampling active parts of the emitting magnetosphere throughout the rotation of the compact object, i.e. has a large duty cycle, as can be the case in a neutron star with near-aligned magnetic and rotation axes. This may lead to apparently aperiodic bursts; however, the polarization angle of the bursts should be tied to the rotational phase from which they occur. This is true for radio pulsars. We therefore propose a new test to identify a possible stable rotation period under the assumptions above, based on a periodogram of the measured polarization angle time series for repeating FRBs. We show that this test is highly sensitive when the duty cycle is large, where standard time-of-arrival periodicity searches fail. Therefore, we can directly test the hypothesis of repeating FRBs of magnetospheric origin with a stable rotation period. Both positive and negative results of the test applied to FRB data will provide important information.

Thermal electrons in the radio afterglow of relativistic tidal disruption event ZTF22aaajecp/AT2022cmc

(2025)

Authors:

Lauren Rhodes, Ben Margalit, Joe S Bright, Hannah Dykaar, Rob Fender, David A Green, Daryl Haggard, Assaf Horesh, Alexander J van der Horst, Andrew Hughes, Kunal Mooley, Itai Sfaradi, David Titterington, David WIlliams-Baldwin

Comprehensive Radio Monitoring of the Black Hole X-ray Binary Swift J1727.8$-$1613 during its 2023$-$2024 Outburst

(2025)

Authors:

Andrew K Hughes, Francesco Carotenuto, Thomas D Russell, Alexandra J Tetarenko, James CA Miller-Jones, Arash Bahramian, Joe S Bright, Fraser J Cowie, Rob Fender, Mark A Gurwell, Jasvinderjit K Khaulsay, Anastasia Kirby, Serena Jones, Elodie Lescure, Michael McCollough, Richard M Plotkin, Ramprasad Rao, Saeqa D Vrtilek, David RA Williams-Baldwin, Callan M Wood, Gregory R Sivakoff, Diego Altamirano, Piergiorgio Casella, Stephane Corbel, David R DeBoer, Melania Del Santo, Constanza Echiburu-Trujillo, Wael Farah, Poshak Gandhi, Karri II Koljonen, Thomas Maccarone, James H Matthews, Sera B Markoff, Alexander W Pollak, David M Russell, Payaswini Saikia, Noel Castro Segura, Aarran W Shaw, Andrew Siemion, Roberto Soria, John A Tomsick, Jakob van den Eijnden

A Multi-wavelength Characterization of the 2023 Outburst of MAXI J1807+132: Manifestations of Disk Instability and Jet Emission

(2025)

Authors:

Sandeep K Rout, M Cristina Baglio, Andrew Hughes, David M Russell, DM Bramich, Payaswini Saikia, Kevin Alabarta, Montserrat Armas Padilla, Sergio Campana, Stefano Covino, Paolo D'Avanzo, Rob Fender, Paolo Goldoni, Jeroen Homan, Fraser Lewis, Nicola Masetti, Sara Motta, Teo Munoz-Darias, Alessandro Papitto, Thomas D Russell, Gregory Sivakoff, Jakob van den Eijnden