From climate projections to trajectory-conditioned local predictions
(2026)
Supplementary material to "From climate projections to trajectory-conditioned local predictions"
(2026)
The impact of stochastic sea ice perturbations on seasonal forecasts
Weather and Climate Dynamics 7:3 (2026) 1593-1618
Abstract:
Sea ice ensemble forecasts can be highly underdispersive, meaning that the ensemble spread is notably lower than the average forecast error. One common strategy to address underdispersion is to add stochastic perturbations to the forecasts. We detail the implementation of a stochastically perturbed parameterisation (SPP) scheme for SI3, the sea ice component used by the Integrated Forecast System (IFS), the forecast model used and developed by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). We then evaluate its impact on seasonal forecasts of Northern Hemisphere summer and winter. The inclusion of SPP is found to enhance ensemble spread for sea ice concentration (SIC) and sea ice thickness (SIT) forecasts by around 10 % relative to a forecast with no SPP, which results in a better calibrated probabilistic forecast. Some small but robust changes to the mean state are also found, including a general decrease in the mean SIC and a redistribution of the winter ice from the central Arctic to the ice edge. These changes reduce or increase the mean bias depending on the region. Changes to the mean and spread of the sea ice result in changes to the mean and spread of air temperature up to at least 850 hPa, altering the mean air temperature biases of the model. An apparent consequence of this is a significant increase in the anomaly correlation coefficients of 500 hPa geopotential height (Z500) over the Euro-Atlantic domain in winter, which partially projects onto the North Atlantic Oscillation. We conclude that sea ice stochastic perturbations can be a valuable contribution to increased reliability of seasonal forecasts of the sea ice itself and can impact seasonal forecasts of the atmosphere at high and mid latitudes.Corrigendum
Journal of Climate American Meteorological Society 39:10 (2026) 2849-2851
Abstract:
Abstract We correct an error relating to the comparison of precipitation variability in coupled models versus models run with prescribed SSTs (“AMIP models”) and discuss what conclusions to draw from the corrected result.Seasonal forecasting using the GenCast probabilistic machine learning model
Climate Dynamics Springer Nature 64:4 (2026) 148