The seismicity of Mars

Nature Geoscience Springer Nature 13:3 (2020) 205-212

Authors:

D Giardini, P Lognonné, WB Banerdt, WT Pike, U Christensen, S Ceylan, JF Clinton, M van Driel, SC Stähler, M Böse, RF Garcia, A Khan, M Panning, C Perrin, D Banfield, E Beucler, C Charalambous, F Euchner, A Horleston, A Jacob, T Kawamura, S Kedar, G Mainsant, J-R Scholz, SE Smrekar, A Spiga, C Agard, D Antonangeli, S Barkaoui, E Barrett, P Combes, V Conejero, I Daubar, M Drilleau, C Ferrier, T Gabsi, T Gudkova, K Hurst, F Karakostas, S King, M Knapmeyer, B Knapmeyer-Endrun, R Llorca-Cejudo, A Lucas, L Luno, L Margerin, JB McClean, D Mimoun, N Murdoch, F Nimmo, M Nonon, C Pardo, A Rivoldini, JA Rodriguez Manfredi, H Samuel, M Schimmel, AE Stott, E Stutzmann, N Teanby, T Warren, RC Weber, M Wieczorek, C Yana

Color, composition, and thermal environment of Kuiper Belt object (486958) Arrokoth

Science American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) 367:6481 (2020)

Authors:

WM Grundy, MK Bird, DT Britt, JC Cook, DP Cruikshank, CJA Howett, S Krijt, IR Linscott, CB Olkin, AH Parker, S Protopapa, M Ruaud, OM Umurhan, LA Young, CM Dalle Ore, JJ Kavelaars, JT Keane, YJ Pendleton, SB Porter, F Scipioni, JR Spencer, SA Stern, AJ Verbiscer, HA Weaver, RP Binzel, MW Buie, BJ Buratti, A Cheng, AM Earle, HA Elliott, L Gabasova, GR Gladstone, ME Hill, M Horanyi, DE Jennings, AW Lunsford, DJ McComas, WB McKinnon, RL McNutt, JM Moore, JW Parker, E Quirico, DC Reuter, PM Schenk, B Schmitt, MR Showalter, KN Singer, GE Weigle, AM Zangari

The geology and geophysics of Kuiper Belt object (486958) Arrokoth

Science American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) 367:6481 (2020)

Authors:

JR Spencer, SA Stern, JM Moore, HA Weaver, KN Singer, CB Olkin, AJ Verbiscer, WB McKinnon, J Wm Parker, RA Beyer, JT Keane, TR Lauer, SB Porter, OL White, BJ Buratti, MR El-Maarry, CM Lisse, AH Parker, HB Throop, SJ Robbins, OM Umurhan, RP Binzel, DT Britt, MW Buie, AF Cheng, DP Cruikshank, HA Elliott, GR Gladstone, WM Grundy, ME Hill, M Horanyi, DE Jennings, JJ Kavelaars, IR Linscott, DJ McComas, RL McNutt, S Protopapa, DC Reuter, PM Schenk, MR Showalter, LA Young, AM Zangari, AY Abedin, CB Beddingfield, SD Benecchi, E Bernardoni, CJ Bierson, D Borncamp, VJ Bray, AL Chaikin, RD Dhingra, C Fuentes, T Fuse, PL Gay, SDJ Gwyn, DP Hamilton, JD Hofgartner, MJ Holman, AD Howard, CJA Howett, H Karoji, DE Kaufmann, M Kinczyk, BH May, M Mountain, M Pätzold, JM Petit, MR Piquette, IN Reid, HJ Reitsema, KD Runyon, SS Sheppard, JA Stansberry, T Stryk, P Tanga, DJ Tholen, DE Trilling, LH Wasserman

Understanding and mitigating biases when studying inhomogeneous emission spectra with JWST

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Royal Astronomical Society (2020)

Authors:

Jake Taylor, Vivien Parmentier, Patrick Irwin, Suzanne Aigrain, Graham Lee, Joshua Krissansen-Totton

Abstract:

Exoplanet emission spectra are often modelled assuming that the hemisphere observed is well represented by a horizontally homogenised atmosphere. However this approximation will likely fail for planets with a large temperature contrast in the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) era, potentially leading to erroneous interpretations of spectra. We first develop an analytic formulation to quantify the signal-to-noise ratio and wavelength coverage necessary to disentangle temperature inhomogeneities from a hemispherically averaged spectrum. We find that for a given signal-to-noise ratio, observations at shorter wavelengths are better at detecting the presence of inhomogeneities. We then determine why the presence of an inhomogeneous thermal structure can lead to spurious molecular detections when assuming a fully homogenised planet in the retrieval process. Finally, we quantify more precisely the potential biases by modelling a suite of hot Jupiter spectra, varying the spatial contributions of a hot and a cold region, as would be observed by the different instruments of JWST/NIRSpec. We then retrieve the abundances and temperature profiles from the synthetic observations. We find that in most cases, assuming a homogeneous thermal structure when retrieving the atmospheric chemistry leads to biased results, and spurious molecular detection. Explicitly modelling the data using two profiles avoids these biases, and is statistically supported provided the wavelength coverage is wide enough, and crucially also spanning shorter wavelengths. For the high contrast used here, a single profile with a dilution factor performs as well as the two-profile case, with only one additional parameter compared to the 1-D approach.

Constraints on the shallow elastic and anelastic structure of Mars from InSight seismic data

Nature Geoscience Springer Nature 13:3 (2020) 213-220

Authors:

P Lognonné, WB Banerdt, WT Pike, Tarje Nissen-Meyer, Simon Calcutt, Tristram Warren

Abstract:

Mars’s seismic activity and noise have been monitored since January 2019 by the seismometer of the InSight (Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport) lander. At night, Mars is extremely quiet; seismic noise is about 500 times lower than Earth’s microseismic noise at periods between 4 s and 30 s. The recorded seismic noise increases during the day due to ground deformations induced by convective atmospheric vortices and ground-transferred wind-generated lander noise. Here we constrain properties of the crust beneath InSight, using signals from atmospheric vortices and from the hammering of InSight’s Heat Flow and Physical Properties (HP3) instrument, as well as the three largest Marsquakes detected as of September 2019. From receiver function analysis, we infer that the uppermost 8–11 km of the crust is highly altered and/or fractured. We measure the crustal diffusivity and intrinsic attenuation using multiscattering analysis and find that seismic attenuation is about three times larger than on the Moon, which suggests that the crust contains small amounts of volatiles.