CMIP6 Models Trend Toward Less Persistent European Blocking Regimes in a Warming Climate
Abstract:
The response of the Euro-Atlantic wintertime circulation to climate change is deeply uncertain. The Atlantic jet is caught in a “tug-of-war” between rapid warming trends in both the tropics and the Arctic leading to debate over the changing “waviness” of the jet, which is subject to strong non-linearity and internal variability. From the complementary perspective of weather regimes, there is considerable uncertainty in how atmospheric blocking will alter under climate change. By applying the hybrid approach of geopotential-jet regimes to 6th phase of the coupled model inter-comparison project projections, we show that the centers of action of anticyclonic regimes hardly alter even under severe warming. Instead, regimes are expected to become less persistent, with zonal flow conditions becoming more prevalent, although models disagree on the details of regime changes. Finally, we show the regime response can be captured qualitatively in a simple Lorenz-like model, emphasizing the conceptual link between observed regimes and those in basic mathematical systems.Insights into the quantification and reporting of model-related uncertainty across different disciplines.
Abstract:
Quantifying uncertainty associated with our models is the only way we can express how much we know about any phenomenon. Incomplete consideration of model-based uncertainties can lead to overstated conclusions with real-world impacts in diverse spheres, including conservation, epidemiology, climate science, and policy. Despite these potentially damaging consequences, we still know little about how different fields quantify and report uncertainty. We introduce the “sources of uncertainty” framework, using it to conduct a systematic audit of model-related uncertainty quantification from seven scientific fields, spanning the biological, physical, and political sciences. Our interdisciplinary audit shows no field fully considers all possible sources of uncertainty, but each has its own best practices alongside shared outstanding challenges. We make ten easy-to-implement recommendations to improve the consistency, completeness, and clarity of reporting on model-related uncertainty. These recommendations serve as a guide to best practices across scientific fields and expand our toolbox for high-quality research.