Semiempirical constraints on the HI mass function of star-forming galaxies and ΩHI at z∼ 0.37 from interferometric surveys
Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 704 (2025) a152
Abstract:
Context. The H I mass function (HIMF) is a crucial tool for understanding the evolution of the H I content in galaxies over cosmic time and, hence, to constraining both the baryon cycle in galaxy evolution and the reionization history of the Universe. Aims. We aim to derive semiempirical constraints at z ∼ 0.37 by combining literature results on the stellar mass function from optical surveys with recent findings on the M HI − M ⋆ scaling relation derived via spectral stacking analysis applied to 21 cm line interferometric data from the MIGHTEE and CHILES surveys, conducted with the MeerKAT and VLA radio telescopes, respectively. Methods. We drew synthetic stellar mass samples directly from the publicly available results underlying the analysis of the COSMOS2020 galaxy photometric sample. We then converted M ⋆ into M HI using analytical fitting functions to the data points from H I stacking. We next fit a Schechter function to the median HIMF from all the samples via Monte Carlo Markov chains. We finally derived the posterior distribution for Ω HI by integrating the models for the HIMF built from the posteriors samples of the Schechter parameters. Results. We find a deviation of the HIMF at z ∼ 0.37 from the results at z ∼ 0 from the ALFALFA survey and at z ∼ 1 from uGMRT data. Our results for Ω HI are in broad agreement with other literature results and follow the overall trend on Ω HI as a function of redshift. The derived value Ω HI = (7.02 +0.59 −0.52 ) × 10 −4 at z ∼ 0.37 from the combined analysis deviates by ∼2.9 σ from the ALFALFA result at z ∼ 0. Conclusions. Our findings regarding the HIMF and Ω HI derived from deep, state-of-the-art interferometric surveys differ from previous literature results at z ∼ 0 and z ∼ 1. We are unable to confirm at this stage whether these differences are due to cosmic evolution consistent with a smooth transition of the H I content of galaxies over the last 8 Gyr or due to selection biases and systematics.The impact of galaxy bias on cross-correlation tomography
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 545:2 (2025) staf2125
Abstract:
The cross-correlation of galaxies at different redshifts with other tracers of the large-scale structure can be used to reconstruct the cosmic mean of key physical quantities, and their evolution over billions of years, at high precision. However, a correct interpretation of these measurements must ensure that they are independent of the clustering properties of the galaxy sample used. In this paper, we explore different prescriptions to extract tomographic reconstruction measurements and use the flamingo hydrodynamic simulations to show that a robust estimator, independent of the small-scale galaxy bias, can be constructed. We focus on the tomographic reconstruction of the halo bias-weighted electron pressure and star formation density , which can be reconstructed from tomographic analysis of Sunyaev–Zel’dovich and cosmic infrared background maps, respectively. We show that these quantities can be reconstructed with an accuracy of 1–3 per cent over a wide range of redshifts, using different galaxy samples. We also show that these measurements can be accurately interpreted using the halo model, assuming that a sufficiently reliable model can be constructed for the halo mass function, large-scale halo bias, and for the dependence of the physical quantities being reconstructed on halo mass.Constraining dark matter halo profiles with symbolic regression
(2025)
Skew-spectra: a generalization to spin-$s$
(2025)
Tracing AGN–galaxy co-evolution with UV line-selected obscured AGN
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 545:2 (2025) staf2076