Deep learning with photosensor timing information as a background rejection method for the Cherenkov Telescope Array

Astroparticle Physics Elsevier 129 (2021) 102579

Authors:

Samuel Spencer, Thomas Armstrong, Jason Watson, Salvatore Mangano, Yves Renier, Garret Cotter

Abstract:

New deep learning techniques present promising new analysis methods for Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes (IACTs) such as the upcoming Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA). In particular, the use of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) could provide a direct event classification method that uses the entire information contained within the Cherenkov shower image, bypassing the need to Hillas parameterise the image and allowing fast processing of the data. Existing work in this field has utilised images of the integrated charge from IACT camera photomultipliers, however the majority of current and upcoming generation IACT cameras have the capacity to read out the entire photosensor waveform following a trigger. As the arrival times of Cherenkov photons from Extensive Air Showers (EAS) at the camera plane are dependent upon the altitude of their emission and the impact distance from the telescope, these waveforms contain information potentially useful for IACT event classification. In this test-of-concept simulation study, we investigate the potential for using these camera pixel waveforms with new deep learning techniques as a background rejection method, against both proton and electron induced EAS. We find that a means of utilising their information is to create a set of seven additional 2-dimensional pixel maps of waveform parameters, to be fed into the machine learning algorithm along with the integrated charge image. Whilst we ultimately find that the only classification power against electrons is based upon event direction, methods based upon timing information appear to out-perform similar charge based methods for gamma/hadron separation. We also review existing methods of event classifications using a combination of deep learning and timing information in other astroparticle physics experiments.

Particle acceleration in radio galaxies with flickering jets: GeV electrons to ultrahigh energy cosmic rays

ArXiv 2103.069 (2021)

Authors:

James H Matthews, Andrew M Taylor

Deep learning with photosensor timing information as a background rejection method for the Cherenkov Telescope Array

(2021)

Authors:

Samuel Spencer, Thomas Armstrong, Jason Watson, Salvatore Mangano, Yves Renier, Garret Cotter

Disk, Corona, Jet Connection in the Intermediate State of MAXI J1820+070 Revealed by NICER Spectral-Timing Analysis

(2021)

Authors:

Jingyi Wang, Guglielmo Mastroserio, Erin Kara, Javier García, Adam Ingram, Riley Connors, Michiel van der Klis, Thomas Dauser, James Steiner, Douglas Buisson, Jeroen Homan, Matteo Lucchini, Andrew Fabian, Joe Bright, Rob Fender, Edward Cackett, Ron Remillard

An early peak in the radio light curve of short-duration gamma-ray burst 200826A

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 503:2 (2021) 2966-2972

Authors:

Lauren Rhodes, Robert Fender, David RA Williams, Kunal Mooley

Abstract:

We present the results of radio observations from the eMERLIN telescope combined with X-ray data from Swift for the short-duration gamma-ray burst (GRB) 200826A, located at a redshift of 0.71. The radio light curve shows evidence of a sharp rise, a peak around 4–5 d post-burst, followed by a relatively steep decline. We provide two possible interpretations based on the time at which the light curve reached its peak. (1) If the light curve peaks earlier, the peak is produced by the synchrotron self-absorption frequency moving through the radio band, resulting from the forward shock propagating into a wind medium and (2) if the light curve peaks later, the turnover in the light curve is caused by a jet break. In the former case we find a minimum equipartition energy of ∼3 × 1047 erg and bulk Lorentz factor of ∼5, while in the latter case we estimate the jet opening angle of ∼9–16°. Due to the lack of data, it is impossible to determine which is the correct interpretation, however due to its relative simplicity and consistency with other multiwavelength observations which hint at the possibility that GRB 200826A is in fact a long GRB, we prefer the scenario one over scenario two.