SN 2023ixf in Messier 101: Photo-ionization of Dense, Close-in Circumstellar Material in a Nearby Type II Supernova

(2023)

Authors:

WV Jacobson-Galan, L Dessart, R Margutti, R Chornock, RJ Foley, CD Kilpatrick, DO Jones, K Taggart, CR Angus, S Bhattacharjee, LA Braff, D Brethauer, AJ Burgasser, F Cao, CM Carlile, KC Chambers, DA Coulter, E Dominguez-Ruiz, CB Dickinson, T de Boer, A Gagliano, C Gall, H Gao, EL Gates, S Gomez, M Guolo, MRJ Halford, J Hjorth, ME Huber, MN Johnson, PR Karpoor, T Laskar, N LeBaron, Z Li, Y Lin, SD Loch, PD Lynam, EA Magnier, P Maloney, DJ Matthews, M McDonald, H-Y Miao, D Milisavljevic, Y-C Pan, S Pradyumna, CL Ransome, JM Rees, A Rest, C Rojas-Bravo, NR Sandford, L Sandoval Ascencio, S Sanjaripour, A Savino, H Sears, N Sharei, SJ Smartt, ER Softich, CA Theissen, S Tinyanont, H Tohfa, VA Villar, Q Wang, RJ Wainscoat, AL Westerling, E Wiston, MA Wozniak, SK Yadavalli, Y Zenati

SN2023ixf in Messier 101: A Variable Red Supergiant as the Progenitor Candidate to a Type II Supernova

(2023)

Authors:

Charles D Kilpatrick, Ryan J Foley, Wynn V Jacobson-Galán, Anthony L Piro, Stephen J Smartt, Maria R Drout, Alexander Gagliano, Christa Gall, Jens Hjorth, David O Jones, Kaisey S Mandel, Raffaella Margutti, Conor L Ransome, V Ashley Villar, David A Coulter, Hua Gao, David Jacob Matthews, Yossef Zenati

A Sensitive Search for Supernova Emission Associated with the Extremely Energetic and Nearby GRB 221009A

The Astrophysical Journal Letters American Astronomical Society 949:2 (2023) L39-L39

Authors:

Gokul P Srinivasaragavan, Brendan O’Connor, S Bradley Cenko, Alexander J Dittmann, Sheng Yang, Jesper Sollerman, GC Anupama, Sudhanshu Barway, Varun Bhalerao, Harsh Kumar, Vishwajeet Swain, Erica Hammerstein, Isiah Holt, Shreya Anand, Igor Andreoni, Michael W Coughlin, Simone Dichiara, Avishay Gal-Yam, M Coleman Miller, Jaime Soon, Roberto Soria, Joseph Durbak, James H Gillanders, Sibasish Laha, Anna M Moore

Abstract:

We report observations of the optical counterpart of the long gamma-ray burst (LGRB) GRB 221009A. Due to the extreme rarity of being both nearby ($z = 0.151$) and highly energetic ($E_{\gamma,\mathrm{iso}} \geq 10^{54}$ erg), GRB 221009A offers a unique opportunity to probe the connection between massive star core collapse and relativistic jet formation across a very broad range of $\gamma$-ray properties. Adopting a phenomenological power-law model for the afterglow and host galaxy estimates from high-resolution Hubble Space Telescope imaging, we use Bayesian model comparison techniques to determine the likelihood of an associated SN contributing excess flux to the optical light curve. Though not conclusive, we find moderate evidence ($K_{\rm{Bayes}}=10^{1.2}$) for the presence of an additional component arising from an associated supernova, SN 2022xiw, and find that it must be substantially fainter ($<$ 67% as bright at the 99% confidence interval) than SN 1998bw. Given the large and uncertain line-of-sight extinction, we attempt to constrain the supernova parameters ($M_{\mathrm{Ni}}$, $M_{\mathrm{ej}}$, and $E_{\mathrm{KE}}$) under several different assumptions with respect to the host galaxy's extinction. We find properties that are broadly consistent with previous GRB-associated SNe: $M_{\rm{Ni}}=0.05$ - $0.25 \, \rm{M_\odot}$, $M_{\rm{ej}}=3.5$ - $11.1 \, \rm{M_\odot}$, and $E_{\rm{KE}} = (1.6$ - $5.2) \times 10^{52} \, \rm{erg}$. We note that these properties are weakly constrained due to the faintness of the supernova with respect to the afterglow and host emission, but we do find a robust upper limit on the $M_{\rm{Ni}}$ of $M_{\rm{Ni}}<0.36\, \rm{M_\odot}$. Given the tremendous range in isotropic gamma-ray energy release exhibited by GRBs (7 orders of magnitude), the SN emission appears to be decoupled from the central engine in these systems.Comment: 18 pages, accepted to ApJL, 4 tables, 5 figures. Updated abstract in Previe

NGC 1436: the making of a lenticular galaxy in the Fornax Cluster

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) 523:1 (2023) 1140-1152

Authors:

Alessandro Loni, Paolo Serra, Marc Sarzi, Gyula IG Józsa, Pablo M Galán-de Anta, Nikki Zabel, Dane Kleiner, Filippo M Maccagni, Daniel Molnár, Mpati Ramatsoku, Francesca Loi, Enrico M Corsini, DJ Pisano, Peter Kamphuis, Timothy A Davis, WJG de Blok, Ralf J Dettmar, Jesus Falcon-Barroso, Enrichetta Iodice, Maritza A Lara-López, S Ilani Loubser, Kana Morokuma-Matsui, Reynier Peletier, Francesca Pinna, Adriano Poci, Matthew WL Smith, Scott C Trager, Glenn van de Ven

Panning for gold, but finding helium: Discovery of the ultra-stripped supernova SN 2019wxt from gravitational-wave follow-up observations

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 675 (2023) A201-A201

Authors:

I Agudo, L Amati, T An, FE Bauer, S Benetti, MG Bernardini, R Beswick, K Bhirombhakdi, T de Boer, M Branchesi, SJ Brennan, E Brocato, MD Caballero-García, E Cappellaro, N Castro Rodríguez, AJ Castro-Tirado, KC Chambers, E Chassande-Mottin, S Chaty, T-W Chen, A Coleiro, S Covino, F D’Ammando, P D’Avanzo, V D’Elia, A Fiore, A Flörs, M Fraser, S Frey, C Frohmaier, M Fulton, L Galbany, C Gall, H Gao, J García-Rojas, G Ghirlanda, S Giarratana, JH Gillanders, M Giroletti, BP Gompertz, M Gromadzki, KE Heintz, J Hjorth, Y-D Hu, ME Huber, A Inkenhaag, L Izzo, ZP Jin, PG Jonker, DA Kann

Abstract:

Most stripped envelope supernova progenitors are formed through binary interaction, losing hydrogen and/or helium from their outer layers. An emerging class of supernovae with the highest degree of envelope-stripping are thought to be the product of stripping by a NS companion. However, relatively few examples are known and the outcomes of such systems can be diverse and are poorly understood at present. Here, we present spectroscopic observations and high cadence multi-band photometry of SN 2023zaw, a low ejecta mass and rapidly evolving supernova. SN 2023zaw was discovered in a nearby spiral galaxy at D = 39.7 Mpc, with significant Milky Way extinction, $E(B-V) = 0.21$, and significant (but uncertain) host extinction. Bayesian evidence comparison reveals that nickel is not the only power source and an additional energy source is required to explain our observations. Our models suggest an ejecta mass of $M_{\rm ej} \sim 0.07\,\rm M_\odot$ and a synthesised nickel mass of $M_{\rm ej} \sim 0.007\,\rm M_\odot$ is required to explain the explosion. However an additional heating from a magnetar or interaction with circumstellar material is required to power the early light curve