Direct comparison between single-scattering properties of ordered and disordered aggregates of nano-sized scattering centers.

Applied optics 60:35 (2021) 10893-10900

Authors:

Maor Sela, Carynelisa Haspel

Abstract:

In this study, we examine the single-scattering properties of aggregates of nano-sized spherical scattering centers (spherules) of different sizes and refractive indices, with an emphasis on contrasting the single-scattering properties of ordered and disordered aggregates, holding all other parameters constant. The ordered aggregates are constructed by arranging the spherules in a simple cubic configuration, while the disordered aggregates are constructed using an ideal amorphous solid algorithm. The single-scattering properties of both kinds of aggregates are computed using the superposition T-matrix method. We find that, in most cases, the scattering and absorption and hence extinction of radiation by ordered aggregates is stronger than for disordered aggregates: for the cases we examine, the average percent difference in scattering efficiency is 14%, and the maximum percent difference in scattering efficiency is 44%; the average percent difference in absorption efficiency is 5.3%, and the maximum percent difference in absorption efficiency is 18%; the average percent difference in extinction efficiency is 12%, and the maximum percent difference in extinction efficiency is 40%. These differences have implications regarding radiative transfer in systems of amorphous particles in general.

Apparent temperature and heat‐related illnesses during international athletic championships: A prospective cohort study

Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports Wiley 31:11 (2021) 2092-2102

Authors:

Karsten Hollander, Milan Klöwer, Andy Richardson, Laurent Navarro, Sébastien Racinais, Volker Scheer, Andrew Murray, Pedro Branco, Toomas Timpka, Astrid Junge, Pascal Edouard

Compressing atmospheric data into its real information content

Nature Computational Science Springer Nature 1:11 (2021) 713-724

Authors:

Milan Klöwer, Miha Razinger, Juan J Dominguez, Peter D Düben, Tim N Palmer

Using Non-Linear Causal Models to Study Aerosol-Cloud Interactions in the Southeast Pacific

(2021)

Authors:

Andrew Jesson, Peter Manshausen, Alyson Douglas, Duncan Watson-Parris, Yarin Gal, Philip Stier

Aerosol absorption in global models from AeroCom phase III

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics European Geosciences Union 21:20 (2021) 15929-15947

Authors:

Maria Sand, Bjorn H Samset, Gunnar Myhre, Jonas Gliss, Susanne E Bauer, Huisheng Bian, Mian Chin, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Paul Ginoux, Zak Kipling, Alf Kirkevag, Harri Kokkola, Philippe Le Sager, Marianne T Lund, Hitoshi Matsui, Twan van Noije, Dirk JL Olivie, Samuel Remy, Michael Schulz, Philip Stier, Camilla W Stjern, Toshihiko Takemura, Kostas Tsigaridis, Svetlana G Tsyro, Duncan Watson-Parris

Abstract:

Aerosol-induced absorption of shortwave radiation can modify the climate through local atmospheric heating, which affects lapse rates, precipitation, and cloud formation. Presently, the total amount of aerosol absorption is poorly constrained, and the main absorbing aerosol species (black carbon (BC), organic aerosols (OA), and mineral dust) are diversely quantified in global climate models. As part of the third phase of the Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) intercomparison initiative (AeroCom phase III), we here document the distribution and magnitude of aerosol absorption in current global aerosol models and quantify the sources of intermodel spread, highlighting the difficulties of attributing absorption to different species. In total, 15 models have provided total present-day absorption at 550 nm (using year 2010 emissions), 11 of which have provided absorption per absorbing species. The multi-model global annual mean total absorption aerosol optical depth (AAOD) is 0.0054 (0.0020 to 0.0098; 550 nm), with the range given as the minimum and maximum model values. This is 28 % higher compared to the 0.0042 (0.0021 to 0.0076) multi-model mean in AeroCom phase II (using year 2000 emissions), but the difference is within 1 standard deviation, which, in this study, is 0.0023 (0.0019 in Phase II). Of the summed component AAOD, 60 % (range 36 %–84 %) is estimated to be due to BC, 31 % (12 %–49 %) is due to dust, and 11 % (0 %–24 %) is due to OA; however, the components are not independent in terms of their absorbing efficiency. In models with internal mixtures of absorbing aerosols, a major challenge is the lack of a common and simple method to attribute absorption to the different absorbing species. Therefore, when possible, the models with internally mixed aerosols in the present study have performed simulations using the same method for estimating absorption due to BC, OA, and dust, namely by removing it and comparing runs with and without the absorbing species. We discuss the challenges of attributing absorption to different species; we compare burden, refractive indices, and density; and we contrast models with internal mixing to models with external mixing. The model mean BC mass absorption coefficient (MAC) value is 10.1 (3.1 to 17.7) m2 g−1 (550 nm), and the model mean BC AAOD is 0.0030 (0.0007 to 0.0077). The difference in lifetime (and burden) in the models explains as much of the BC AAOD spread as the difference in BC MAC values. The difference in the spectral dependency between the models is striking. Several models have an absorption Ångstrøm exponent (AAE) close to 1, which likely is too low given current knowledge of spectral aerosol optical properties. Most models do not account for brown carbon and underestimate the spectral dependency for OA.