Skip to main content
Home
Department Of Physics text logo
  • Research
    • Our research
    • Our research groups
    • Our research in action
    • Research funding support
    • Summer internships for undergraduates
  • Study
    • Undergraduates
    • Postgraduates
  • Engage
    • For alumni
    • For business
    • For schools
    • For the public
  • Support
Menu
Black Hole

Lensing of space time around a black hole. At Oxford we study black holes observationally and theoretically on all size and time scales - it is some of our core work.

Credit: ALAIN RIAZUELO, IAP/UPMC/CNRS. CLICK HERE TO VIEW MORE IMAGES.

Christopher Duncan

Visitor

Sub department

  • Astrophysics

Research groups

  • Beecroft Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
  • Euclid
christopher.duncan@physics.ox.ac.uk
Telephone: 01865(2)83016
Denys Wilkinson Building, room 555A
  • About
  • Publications

Euclidpreparation

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 664 (2022) A196-A196

Authors:

R Saglia, S De Nicola, M Fabricius, V Guglielmo, J Snigula, R Zöller, R Bender, J Heidt, D Masters, D Stern, S Paltani, A Amara, N Auricchio, M Baldi, C Bodendorf, D Bonino, E Branchini, M Brescia, J Brinchmann, S Camera, V Capobianco, C Carbone, J Carretero, M Castellano, S Cavuoti, CAJ Duncan

Abstract:

The Complete Calibration of the Color-Redshift Relation survey (C3R2) is a spectroscopic programme designed to empirically calibrate the galaxy color-redshift relation to the Euclid depth (I_E=24.5), a key ingredient for the success of Stage IV dark energy projects based on weak lensing cosmology. A spectroscopic calibration sample as representative as possible of the galaxies in the Euclid weak lensing sample is being collected, selecting galaxies from a self-organizing map (SOM) representation of the galaxy color space. Here, we present the results of a near-infrared H- and K-bands spectroscopic campaign carried out using the LUCI instruments at the LBT. For a total of 251 galaxies, we present new highly-reliable redshifts in the 1.3<= z <=1.7 and 2<= z<=2.7 ranges. The newly-determined redshifts populate 49 SOM cells which previously contained no spectroscopic measurements and almost double the occupation numbers of an additional 153 SOM cells. A final optical ground-based observational effort is needed to calibrate the missing cells in particular in the redshift range 1.7<= z<=2.7 that lack spectroscopic calibration. In the end, Euclid itself will deliver telluric-free NIR spectra that can complete the calibration...
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details
More details

Euclid preparation

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 662 (2022) a112

Authors:

R Scaramella, J Amiaux, Y Mellier, C Burigana, CS Carvalho, J-C Cuillandre, A Da Silva, A Derosa, J Dinis, E Maiorano, M Maris, I Tereno, R Laureijs, T Boenke, G Buenadicha, X Dupac, LM Gaspar Venancio, P Gómez-Álvarez, J Hoar, J Lorenzo Alvarez, GD Racca, G Saavedra-Criado, J Schwartz, R Vavrek, M Schirmer, H Aussel, R Azzollini, VF Cardone, M Cropper, A Ealet, B Garilli, W Gillard, BR Granett, L Guzzo, H Hoekstra, K Jahnke, T Kitching, T Maciaszek, M Meneghetti, L Miller, R Nakajima, SM Niemi, F Pasian, WJ Percival, S Pottinger, M Sauvage, M Scodeggio, S Wachter, A Zacchei, N Aghanim, A Amara, T Auphan, N Auricchio, S Awan, A Balestra, R Bender, C Bodendorf, D Bonino, E Branchini, S Brau-Nogue, M Brescia, GP Candini, V Capobianco, C Carbone, RG Carlberg, J Carretero, R Casas, FJ Castander, M Castellano, S Cavuoti, A Cimatti, R Cledassou, G Congedo, CJ Conselice, L Conversi, Y Copin, L Corcione, A Costille, F Courbin, H Degaudenzi, M Douspis, F Dubath, CAJ Duncan, S Dusini, S Farrens, S Ferriol, P Fosalba, N Fourmanoit, M Frailis, E Franceschi, P Franzetti, M Fumana, B Gillis, C Giocoli, A Grazian, F Grupp, SVH Haugan, W Holmes, F Hormuth, P Hudelot, S Kermiche, A Kiessling, M Kilbinger, R Kohley, B Kubik, M Kümmel, M Kunz, H Kurki-Suonio, O Lahav, S Ligori, PB Lilje, I Lloro, O Mansutti, O Marggraf, K Markovic, F Marulli, R Massey, S Maurogordato, M Melchior, E Merlin, G Meylan, JJ Mohr, M Moresco, B Morin, L Moscardini, E Munari, RC Nichol, C Padilla, S Paltani, J Peacock, K Pedersen, V Pettorino, S Pires, M Poncet, L Popa, L Pozzetti, F Raison, R Rebolo, J Rhodes, H-W Rix, M Roncarelli, E Rossetti, R Saglia, P Schneider, T Schrabback, A Secroun, G Seidel, S Serrano, C Sirignano, G Sirri, J Skottfelt, L Stanco, JL Starck, P Tallada-Crespí, D Tavagnacco, AN Taylor, HI Teplitz, R Toledo-Moreo, F Torradeflot, M Trifoglio, EA Valentijn, L Valenziano, GA Verdoes Kleijn, Y Wang, N Welikala, J Weller, M Wetzstein, G Zamorani, J Zoubian, S Andreon, M Baldi, S Bardelli, A Boucaud, S Camera, D Di Ferdinando, G Fabbian, R Farinelli, S Galeotta, J Graciá-Carpio, D Maino, E Medinaceli, S Mei, C Neissner, G Polenta, A Renzi, E Romelli, C Rosset, F Sureau, M Tenti, T Vassallo, E Zucca, C Baccigalupi, A Balaguera-Antolínez, P Battaglia, A Biviano, S Borgani, E Bozzo, R Cabanac, A Cappi, S Casas, G Castignani, C Colodro-Conde, J Coupon, HM Courtois, J Cuby, S de la Torre, S Desai, H Dole, M Fabricius, M Farina, PG Ferreira, F Finelli, P Flose-Reimberg, S Fotopoulou, K Ganga, G Gozaliasl, IM Hook, E Keihanen, CC Kirkpatrick, P Liebing, V Lindholm, G Mainetti, M Martinelli, N Martinet, M Maturi, HJ McCracken, RB Metcalf, G Morgante, J Nightingale, A Nucita, L Patrizii, D Potter, G Riccio, AG Sánchez, D Sapone, JA Schewtschenko, M Schultheis, V Scottez, R Teyssier, I Tutusaus, J Valiviita, M Viel, W Vriend, L Whittaker
More details from the publisher
More details
More details

Euclid: Covariance of weak lensing pseudo-Cℓ estimates

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 660 (2022) a114

Authors:

RE Upham, ML Brown, L Whittaker, A Amara, N Auricchio, D Bonino, E Branchini, M Brescia, J Brinchmann, V Capobianco, C Carbone, J Carretero, M Castellano, S Cavuoti, A Cimatti, R Cledassou, G Congedo, L Conversi, Y Copin, L Corcione, M Cropper, A Da Silva, H Degaudenzi, M Douspis, F Dubath, CAJ Duncan, X Dupac, S Dusini, A Ealet, S Farrens, S Ferriol, P Fosalba, M Frailis, E Franceschi, M Fumana, B Garilli, B Gillis, C Giocoli, F Grupp, SVH Haugan, H Hoekstra, W Holmes, F Hormuth, A Hornstrup, K Jahnke, S Kermiche, A Kiessling, M Kilbinger, T Kitching, M Kümmel, M Kunz, H Kurki-Suonio, S Ligori, PB Lilje, I Lloro, O Marggraf, K Markovic, F Marulli, M Meneghetti, G Meylan, M Moresco, L Moscardini, E Munari, SM Niemi, C Padilla, S Paltani, F Pasian, K Pedersen, V Pettorino, S Pires, M Poncet, L Popa, F Raison, J Rhodes, E Rossetti, R Saglia, B Sartoris, P Schneider, A Secroun, G Seidel, C Sirignano, G Sirri, L Stanco, J-L Starck, P Tallada-Crespí, D Tavagnacco, AN Taylor, I Tereno, R Toledo-Moreo, F Torradeflot, L Valenziano, Y Wang, G Zamorani, J Zoubian, S Andreon, M Baldi, S Camera, VF Cardone, G Fabbian, G Polenta, A Renzi, B Joachimi, A Hall, A Loureiro, E Sellentin
More details from the publisher
More details
More details

Forecasting the potential of weak lensing magnification to enhance LSST large-scale structure analyses

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 513:1 (2022) 1210-1228

Authors:

C Mahony, Mc Fortuna, B Joachimi, A Korn, H Hoekstra, Sj Schmidt, D Alonso, S Singh, M Ricci, H Hildebrandt, C Duncan, H Johnston

Abstract:

Recent works have shown that weak lensing magnification must be included in upcoming large-scale structure analyses, such as for the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), to avoid biasing the cosmological results. In this work, we investigate whether including magnification has a positive impact on the precision of the cosmological constraints, as well as being necessary to avoid bias. We forecast this using an LSST mock catalogue and a halo model to calculate the galaxy power spectra. We find that including magnification has little effect on the precision of the cosmological parameter constraints for an LSST galaxy clustering analysis, where the halo model parameters are additionally constrained by the galaxy luminosity function. In particular, we find that for the LSST gold sample (i < 25.3) including weak lensing magnification only improves the galaxy clustering constraint on.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA

Euclid: Forecast constraints on consistency tests of the ΛCDM model

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 660 (2022) A67-A67

Authors:

S Nesseris, D Sapone, M Martinelli, D Camarena, V Marra, Z Sakr, J Garcia-Bellido, CJAP Martins, C Clarkson, A Da Silva, P Fleury, L Lombriser, JP Mimoso, S Casas, V Pettorino, I Tutusaus, A Amara, N Auricchio, C Bodendorf, D Bonino, E Branchini, M Brescia, V Capobianco, C Carbone, J Carretero, CAJ Duncan

Abstract:

Context. The standard cosmological model is based on the fundamental assumptions of a spatially homogeneous and isotropic universe on large scales. An observational detection of a violation of these assumptions at any redshift would immediately indicate the presence of new physics. Aims. We quantify the ability of the Euclid mission, together with contemporary surveys, to improve the current sensitivity of null tests of the canonical cosmological constant Λ and the cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model in the redshift range 0 < z < 1.8. Methods. We considered both currently available data and simulated Euclid and external data products based on a ΛCDM fiducial model, an evolving dark energy model assuming the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder parameterization or an inhomogeneous Lemaître-Tolman-Bondi model with a cosmological constant Λ, and carried out two separate but complementary analyses: a machine learning reconstruction of the null tests based on genetic algorithms, and a theory-agnostic parametric approach based on Taylor expansion and binning of the data, in order to avoid assumptions about any particular model. Results. We find that in combination with external probes, Euclid can improve current constraints on null tests of the ΛCDM by approximately a factor of three when using the machine learning approach and by a further factor of two in the case of the parametric approach. However, we also find that in certain cases, the parametric approach may be biased against or missing some features of models far from ΛCDM. Conclusions. Our analysis highlights the importance of synergies between Euclid and other surveys. These synergies are crucial for providing tighter constraints over an extended redshift range for a plethora of different consistency tests of some of the main assumptions of the current cosmological paradigm.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details
More details

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Prev
  • …
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Current page 12
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Footer Menu

  • Contact us
  • Giving to the Dept of Physics
  • Work with us
  • Media

User account menu

  • Log in

Follow us

FIND US

Clarendon Laboratory,

Parks Road,

Oxford,

OX1 3PU

CONTACT US

Tel: +44(0)1865272200

University of Oxfrod logo Department Of Physics text logo
IOP Juno Champion logo Athena Swan Silver Award logo

© University of Oxford - Department of Physics

Cookies | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement

Built by: Versantus

  • Home
  • Research
  • Study
  • Engage
  • Our people
  • News & Comment
  • Events
  • Our facilities & services
  • About us
  • Giving to Physics
  • Current students
  • Staff intranet