Christopher Duncan

Abstract:

We present the first measurement of individual cluster mass estimates using weak lensing size and flux magnification. Using data from the HST STAGES (Space Telescope A901/902 Galaxy Evolution Survey) survey of the A901/902 supercluster we detect the four known groups in the supercluster at high significance using magnification alone. We discuss the application of a fully Bayesian inference analysis, and investigate a broad range of potential systematics in the application of the method. We compare our results to a previous weak lensing shear analysis of the same field finding the recovered signal-to-noise of our magnification-only analysis to range from 45 to 110 per cent of the signal-to-noise in the shear-only analysis. On a case-by-case basis we find consistent magnification and shear constraints on cluster virial radius, and finding that for the full sample, magnification constraints to be a factor 0.77 ± 0.18 lower than the shear measurements.

Abstract:

With the wealth of upcoming data from wide-field surveys such as KiDS, Pan-STARRS, DES and Euclid, it is more important than ever to understand the full range of independent probes of cosmology at our disposal. With this in mind, we motivate the use of cosmic magnification as a probe of cosmology, presenting forecasts for the improvements to cosmic shear cosmological parameter constraints when cosmic magnification is included for a KiDS-like survey. We find that when uncertainty in the galaxy bias is factored into the forecasts, cosmic magnification is less powerful that previously reported, but as it is less likely to be prone to measurement error we conclude it is a useful tool for cosmological analyses.

Abstract:

Our aim is to quantify the impact of systematic effects on the inference of cosmological parameters from cosmic shear. We present an end-to-end approach that introduces sources of bias in a modelled weak lensing survey on a galaxy-by-galaxy level. Residual biases are propagated through a pipeline from galaxy properties (one end) through to cosmic shear power spectra and cosmological parameter estimates (the other end), to quantify how imperfect knowledge of the pipeline changes the maximum likelihood values of dark energy parameters. We quantify the impact of an imperfect correction for charge transfer inefficiency (CTI) and modelling uncertainties of the point spread function (PSF) for Euclid, and find that the biases introduced can be corrected to acceptable levels.