Skip to main content
Home
Department Of Physics text logo
  • Research
    • Our research
    • Our research groups
    • Our research in action
    • Research funding support
    • Summer internships for undergraduates
  • Study
    • Undergraduates
    • Postgraduates
  • Engage
    • For alumni
    • For business
    • For schools
    • For the public
Menu
Juno Jupiter image

Stuart Jenkins

Visitor

Sub department

  • Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics
stuart.jenkins@ouce.ox.ac.uk
Atmospheric Physics Clarendon Laboratory, room 114
  • About
  • Publications

Extended producer responsibility for fossil fuels *

Environmental Research Letters IOP Publishing 18:1 (2023) 011005-011005

Authors:

Stuart Jenkins, Margriet Kuijper, Hugh Helferty, Cécile Girardin, Myles Allen

Abstract:

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Energy policy faces a triple challenge: increasing resilience and guaranteeing the security of supply of both fossil and non-fossil energy, minimising the impact on consumer energy prices, and retaining consistency with Paris Agreement climate goals. High prices and producer rents, however, also present an opportunity: to open a conversation about applying the principle of extended producer responsibility (EPR) to fossil fuels. We demonstrate that this could deconflict energy security and climate policy at an affordable cost by stopping fossil fuels from causing further global warming. Implementing EPR through a combination of geological CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> storage and nature-based solutions can deliver net zero at comparable or lower costs than conventional scenarios driven with a global carbon price and subject to constraints on CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> storage deployment. It would also mean that the principal beneficiary of high fossil fuel prices, the fossil fuel industry itself, plays its part in addressing the climate challenge while reducing the risk of asset stranding.</jats:p>
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details

Tonga eruption increases chance of temporary surface temperature anomaly above 1.5 °C

Nature Climate Change Springer Science and Business Media LLC (2023)

Authors:

Stuart Jenkins, Chris Smith, Myles Allen, Roy Grainger
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details

The Multi-Decadal Response to Net Zero CO2 Emissions and Implications for Emissions Policy

Geophysical Research Letters 49:23 (2022)

Authors:

S Jenkins, B Sanderson, G Peters, Tl Frölicher, P Friedlingstein, M Allen

Abstract:

How confident are we that CO2 emissions must reach net zero or below to halt CO2-induced warming? The IPCC's sixth assessment report concluded that “limiting human-induced global warming to a specific level requires … reaching at least net zero CO2 emissions.” This is much stronger language than the special report on the global warming of 1.5°C, which concluded that reaching net zero CO2 emissions would be sufficient. Here we show that “approximately net zero” is better supported than “at least net zero.” We estimate the rate of adjustment to zero emissions (RAZE) parameter (−0.24 to +0.17%/yr), defined as the fractional change in CO2-induced warming after CO2 emissions cease. The RAZE determines the CO2 emissions compatible with halting warming over multiple decades: in 1.5°C-consistent scenarios, CO2 emissions consistent with halting anthropogenic warming are +2.2 GtCO2/yr (5–95th percentile range spans −7.3 to +6.2 GtCO2/yr), similar to the expected emissions from unmodelled Earth system feedbacks.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details

Robust evidence for reversal of the trend in aerosol effective climate forcing

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics European Geosciences Union 22:18 (2022) 12221-12239

Authors:

Johannes Quaas, Hailing Jia, Chris Smith, Anna Lea Albright, Wenche Aas, Nicolas Bellouin, Olivier Boucher, Marie Doutriaux-Boucher, Piers M Forster, Daniel Grosvenor, Stuart Jenkins, Zbigniew Klimont, Norman G Loeb, Xiaoyan Ma, Vaishali Naik, Fabien Paulot, Philip Stier, Martin Wild, Gunnar Myhre, Michael Schulz

Abstract:

Anthropogenic aerosols exert a cooling influence that offsets part of the greenhouse gas warming. Due to their short tropospheric lifetime of only several days, the aerosol forcing responds quickly to emissions. Here, we present and discuss the evolution of the aerosol forcing since 2000. There are multiple lines of evidence that allow us to robustly conclude that the anthropogenic aerosol effective radiative forcing (ERF) – both aerosol–radiation interactions (ERFari) and aerosol–cloud interactions (ERFaci) – has become less negative globally, i.e. the trend in aerosol effective radiative forcing changed sign from negative to positive. Bottom-up inventories show that anthropogenic primary aerosol and aerosol precursor emissions declined in most regions of the world; observations related to aerosol burden show declining trends, in particular of the fine-mode particles that make up most of the anthropogenic aerosols; satellite retrievals of cloud droplet numbers show trends in regions with aerosol declines that are consistent with these in sign, as do observations of top-of-atmosphere radiation. Climate model results, including a revised set that is constrained by observations of the ocean heat content evolution show a consistent sign and magnitude for a positive forcing relative to the year 2000 due to reduced aerosol effects. This reduction leads to an acceleration of the forcing of climate change, i.e. an increase in forcing by 0.1 to 0.3 W m−2, up to 12 % of the total climate forcing in 2019 compared to 1750 according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details

Is anthropogenic global warming accelerating?

Journal of Climate American Meteorological Society 35:24 (2022) 4273-4290

Authors:

Stuart Jenkins, Adam Povey, Andrew Gettelman, Roy Grainger, Philip Stier, Myles Allen

Abstract:

Estimates of the anthropogenic effective radiative forcing (ERF) trend have increased by 50% since 2000 (+0.4W/m2/decade in 2000-2009 to +0.6W/m2/decade in 2010-2019), the majority of which is driven by changes in the aerosol ERF trend, due to aerosol emissions reductions. Here we study the extent to which observations of the climate system agree with these ERF assumptions. We use a large ERF ensemble from IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) to attribute the anthropogenic contributions to global mean surface temperature (GMST), top-of-atmosphere radiative flux, and aerosol optical depth observations. The GMST trend has increased from +0.18°C/decade in 2000-2009 to +0.35°C/decade in 2010-2019, coinciding with the anthropogenic warming trend rising from +0.19°C/decade in 2000-2009 to +0.24°C/decade in 2010-2019. This, and observed trends in top-of-atmosphere radiative fluxes and aerosol optical depths support the claim of an aerosol-induced temporary acceleration in the rate of warming. However, all three observation datasets additionally suggest smaller aerosol ERF trend changes are compatible with observations since 2000, since radiative flux and GMST trends are significantly influenced by internal variability over this period. A zero-trend-change aerosol ERF scenario results in a much smaller anthropogenic warming acceleration since 2000, but is poorly represented in AR6’s ERF ensemble. Short-term ERF trends are difficult to verify using observations, so caution is required in predictions or policy judgments that depend on them, such as estimates of current anthropogenic warming trend, and the time remaining to, or the outstanding carbon budget consistent with, 1.5°C warming. Further systematic research focused on quantifying trends and early identification of acceleration or deceleration is required.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Prev
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Current page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • …
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Footer Menu

  • Contact us
  • Giving to the Dept of Physics
  • Work with us
  • Media

User account menu

  • Log in

Follow us

FIND US

Clarendon Laboratory,

Parks Road,

Oxford,

OX1 3PU

CONTACT US

Tel: +44(0)1865272200

University of Oxfrod logo Department Of Physics text logo
IOP Juno Champion logo Athena Swan Silver Award logo

© University of Oxford - Department of Physics

Cookies | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement

Built by: Versantus

  • Home
  • Research
  • Study
  • Engage
  • Our people
  • News & Comment
  • Events
  • Our facilities & services
  • About us
  • Current students
  • Staff intranet