Galaxy-SMBH co-evolution in 2,435 DESI disk galaxies and merger-free BH growth in bulgeless disks
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) (2026) stag1783
Abstract:
Abstract We analyse black hole scaling relations for disk-dominated galaxies, and present evidence for secularly driven galaxy-black hole co-evolution. We do this observationally by looking at “bulgeless” galaxies, where the lack of a stellar bulge suggests a quiet merger history. We first compose a sample of 2,435 disk-dominated galaxies hosting optical broad line active galactic nuclei (AGN) from DESI data, and find a $M_{\mathrm{BH}^{}}$–$M_{*}^{}$ scaling relation of log (MBH) $= - 3.7^{+0.3}_{-0.3} + 1.00^{+0.03}_{-0.03} \log (M_*)$. From these, we identify 546 bulgeless galaxies hosting AGN, a factor of ≳ 5 larger than pre-existing samples, and find they follow the same $M_{\mathrm{BH}^{}}$-$M_{*}^{}$ relation as the general disk galaxy sample. Comparing the bulgeless galaxies to those with some bulge component, we find good agreement in the $M_{\mathrm{BH}^{}}$–$M_{*}^{}$ relation (within 3σ), but disagreement in the $M_{\mathrm{BH}^{}}$–$M_{\mathrm{*,bulge}}^{}$ relation (at >7σ). This is the opposite of what is expected from merger-driven co-evolution, suggesting secular growth is significant in establishing observed $M_{\mathrm{BH}^{}}$–$M_{*}^{}$ scaling relations. Furthermore, in a control sample of early-type galaxies we find tentative evidence of increased AGN luminosity compared to the bulgeless sample, but no statistical difference in black hole mass. This suggests the assumed merger-dominated evolutionary history of early-type galaxies does not lead to significantly increased long-term BH growth. These results support numerous recent observational and theoretical studies which suggest secular processes fuel significant supermassive black hole growth and galaxy-black hole co-evolution.Galaxy Zoo JWST: Up to 75% of discs are featureless at 3 < z < 7
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2025) staf506
Galaxy Zoo CEERS: Bar Fractions Up to z ∼ 4.0
The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 987:1 (2025) 74
Abstract:
We study the evolution of the bar fraction in disk galaxies between 0.5 < z < 4.0 using multiband colored images from JWST Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey (CEERS). These images were classified by citizen scientists in a new phase of the Galaxy Zoo (GZ) project called GZ CEERS. Citizen scientists were asked whether a strong or weak bar was visible in the host galaxy. After considering multiple corrections for observational biases, we find that the bar fraction decreases with redshift in our volume-limited sample (n = 398); from 25−4+6 % at 0.5 < z < 1.0 to 3−1+6 % at 3.0 < z < 4.0. However, we argue it is appropriate to interpret these fractions as lower limits. Disentangling real changes in the bar fraction from detection biases remains challenging. Nevertheless, we find a significant number of bars up to z = 2.5. This implies that disks are dynamically cool or baryon dominated, enabling them to host bars. This also suggests that bar-driven secular evolution likely plays an important role at higher redshifts. When we distinguish between strong and weak bars, we find that the weak bar fraction decreases with increasing redshift. In contrast, the strong bar fraction is constant between 0.5 < z < 2.5. This implies that the strong bars found in this work are robust long-lived structures, unless the rate of bar destruction is similar to the rate of bar formation. Finally, our results are consistent with disk instabilities being the dominant mode of bar formation at lower redshifts, while bar formation through interactions and mergers is more common at higher redshifts.Supermassive black holes in merger-free galaxies have higher spins which are preferentially aligned with their host galaxy
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) 527:4 (2023) 10867-10877
Evidence for non-merger co-evolution of galaxies and their supermassive black holes
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 527:4 (2023) 10855-10866