Skip to main content
Home
Department Of Physics text logo
  • Research
    • Our research
    • Our research groups
    • Our research in action
    • Research funding support
    • Summer internships for undergraduates
  • Study
    • Undergraduates
    • Postgraduates
  • Engage
    • For alumni
    • For business
    • For schools
    • For the public
  • Support
Menu
Milky Way Galaxy
Credit: H F Stevance

Dr Heloise Stevance

Schmidt AI in Science Fellow

Research theme

  • Astronomy and astrophysics

Sub department

  • Astrophysics
heloise.stevance@physics.ox.ac.uk
hfstevance.com
  • About
  • Research
  • Selected invited lectures
  • Prizes, awards and recognition
  • Publications

ATLAS100 -- I. A volume-limited sample of supernovae and related transients within 100 Mpc

(2026)

Authors:

Shubham Srivastav, Stephen J Smartt, Thomas Moore, Kenneth W Smith, David R Young, Michael D Fulton, Charlotte R Angus, Matt Nicholl, Heloise F Stevance, Ting-Wan Chen, Andrea Pastorello, Julian Sommer, Fiorenzo Stoppa, Jack W Tweddle, Joseph P Anderson, Mark E Huber, Armin Rest, Lauren Rhodes, Luke J Shingles, Aysha Aamer, Alejandro Clocchiatti, Alexander J Cooper, Nicolas Erasmus, James H Gillanders, Dylan Magill, Giuliano Pignata, Paige Ramsden, Brian P Schmidt, Xinyue Sheng, Joshua G Weston, Larry Denneau, John L Tonry

A Python client for the ATLAS API

The Journal of Open Source Software The Open Journal 11:119 (2026) 9462

Authors:

Heloise F Stevance, Jack Leland, Ken W Smith
More details from the publisher

Anomaly Hunter for Alerts (AHA): Anomaly Detection in the ZTF Transient Alert Stream

(2026)

Authors:

Leyla Iskandarli, Chris J Lintott, Steve Croft, Heloise Stevance, Joshua Weston

Search for the Optical Counterpart of Einstein Probe–discovered Fast X-Ray Transients from the Lulin Observatory

The Astrophysical Journal: Supplement Series American Astronomical Society 281:1 (2025) 20

Authors:

Amar Aryan, Ting-Wan Chen, Sheng Yang, James H Gillanders, Albert KH Kong, SJ Smartt, Heloise F Stevance, Yi-Jung Yang, Aysha Aamer, Rahul Gupta, Lele Fan, Wei-Jie Hou, Hsiang-Yao Hsiao, Amit Kumar, Cheng-Han Lai, Meng-Han Lee, Yu-Hsing Lee, Hung-Chin Lin, Chi-Sheng Lin, Chow-Choong Ngeow, Matt Nicholl, Yen-Chen Pan, Shashi Bhushan Pandey, Aiswarya Sankar.K, Shubham Srivastav

Abstract:

The launch of the Einstein probe (EP) mission has revolutionized the detection and follow-up observations of fast X-ray transients (FXTs) by providing prompt and timely access to their precise localizations. In the first year of its operation, the EP mission reported the discovery of 72 high signal-to-noise FXTs. Subjected to the visibility in the sky and weather conditions, we search for the optical counterparts of 42 EP-discovered FXTs from the Lulin Observatory. We successfully detected the optical counterparts of 12 FXTs, and five of those were first discovered by us from the Lulin Observatory. We find that the optical counterparts are generally faint (r > 20 mag) and decline rapidly (>0.5 mag day−1). We also find that 12 out of 42 FXTs show direct evidence of their association with gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) through significant temporal and spatial overlapping. Furthermore, the luminosities and redshifts of FXTs with confirmed optical counterparts in our observations are fully consistent with the faintest end of the GRB population. However, the nondetection of any associated optical counterpart with a significant fraction of FXTs suggests that EP FXTs are likely a subset of the so-called “dark FXTs,” similar to “dark GRBs.” Additionally, the luminosities of two FXTs with confirmed redshifts are also consistent with jetted tidal disruption events (TDEs). However, we find that the optical luminosities of FXTs differ significantly from typical supernova shock breakout or kilonova emissions. Thus, we conclude that a significant fraction of EP-discovered FXTs are associated with events having relativistic jets; either a GRB or a jetted TDE.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details

Limits on the ejecta mass during the search for kilonovae associated with neutron star-black hole mergers: A case study of S230518h, GW230529, S230627c and the low-significance candidate S240422ed

Physical Review D American Physical Society (APS) 112:8 (2025) 083002

Authors:

M Pillas, S Antier, K Ackley, T Ahumada, D Akl, L de Almeida, S Anand, C Andrade, I Andreoni, KA Bostroem, M Bulla, E Burns, T Cabrera, S Chang, H Choi, B O’Connor, MW Coughlin, W Corradi, AR Gibbs, T Dietrich, D Dornic, J-G Ducoin, P-A Duverne, H-B Eggenstein, M Freeberg, M Dyer, M Fausnaugh, Wen-fai Fong, F Foucart, D Frostig, N Guessoum, Vaidehi Gupta, P Hello, G Hosseinzadeh, L Hu, T Hussenot-Desenonges, M Im, R Jayaraman, M Jeong, V Karambelkar, M Kasliwal, S Kim, CD Kilpatrick, N Kochiashvili, S Karpov, K Kunnumkai, M Lamoureux, CU Lee, N Lourie, J Lyman, M Mašek, F Magnani, G Mo, M Molham, AH Nitz, M Nicholl, F Navarete, K Noysena, D O’Neill, GSH Paek, A Palmese, R Poggiani, T Pradier, O Pyshna, Y Rajabov, JC Rastinejad, DJ Sand, P Shawhan, M Shrestha, R Simcoe, SJ Smartt, D Steeghs, R Stein, HF Stevance, A Takey, M Sun, A Toivonen, D Turpin, K Ulaczyk, A Wold, T Wouters

Abstract:

Neutron star-black hole (NSBH) mergers, detectable via their gravitational-wave (GW) emission, are expected to produce kilonovae (KNe). Four NSBH candidates have been identified and followed-up by more than fifty instruments since the start of the fourth GW observing run (O4), in May 2023, up to July 2024; however, no confirmed associated KN has been detected. This study evaluates ejecta properties from multimessenger observations to understand the absence of detectable KN: we use GW public information and joint observations taken from 05.2023 to 07.2024 (LVK, ATLAS, DECam, GECKO, GOTO, GRANDMA, SAGUARO, TESS, WINTER, ZTF). First, our analysis on follow-up observation strategies shows that, on average, more than 50% of the simulated KNe associated with NSBH mergers reach their peak luminosity around one day after merger in the g, r, i- bands, which is not necessarily covered for each NSBH GW candidate. We also analyze the trade-off between observation efficiency and the intrinsic properties of the KN emission, to understand the impact on how these constraints affect our ability to detect the KN, and underlying ejecta properties for each GW candidate. In particular, we can only confirm the kilonova was not missed for 1% of the GW230529 and S230627c sky localization region, given the large sky localization error of GW230529 and the large distance for S230627c and, their respective KN faint luminosities. More constraining, for S230518h, we infer the dynamical ejecta and postmerger disk wind ejecta mdyn,mwind<0.03M⊙ and the viewing angle θ>25°. Similarly, the nonastrophysical origin of S240422ed is likely further confirmed by the fact that we would have detected even a faint KN at the time and presumed distance of the S240422ed event candidate, within a minimum 45% credible region of the sky area, that can be larger depending on the KN scenario.
More details from the publisher
More details

Pagination

  • Current page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • …
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Footer Menu

  • Contact us
  • Giving to the Dept of Physics
  • Work with us
  • Media

User account menu

  • Log in

Follow us

FIND US

Clarendon Laboratory,

Parks Road,

Oxford,

OX1 3PU

CONTACT US

Tel: +44(0)1865272200

University of Oxfrod logo Department Of Physics text logo
IOP Juno Champion logo Athena Swan Silver Award logo

© University of Oxford - Department of Physics

Cookies | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement

Built by: Versantus

  • Home
  • Research
  • Study
  • Engage
  • Our people
  • News & Comment
  • Events
  • Our facilities & services
  • About us
  • Giving to Physics
  • Current students
  • Staff intranet