MIGHTEE: total intensity radio continuum imaging and the COSMOS / XMM-LSS Early Science fields

ArXiv 2110.00347 (2021)

Authors:

I Heywood, MJ Jarvis, CL Hale, IH Whittam, HL Bester, B Hugo, JS Kenyon, M Prescott, OM Smirnov, C Tasse, JM Afonso, PN Best, JD Collier, RP Deane, BS Frank, MJ Hardcastle, K Knowles, N Maddox, EJ Murphy, I Prandoni, SM Randriamampandry, MG Santos, S Sekhar, F Tabatabaei, AR Taylor, K Thorat

Radio spectral properties of star-forming galaxies in the MIGHTEE-COSMOS field and their impact on the far-infrared-radio correlation

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 507:256 (2021) 2643-2658

Authors:

Fangxia An, M Vaccari, Ian Smail, Mj Jarvis, Ih Whittam, Cl Hale, S Jin, Jd Collier, E Daddi, J Delhaize, B Frank, Ej Murphy, M Prescott, S Sekhar, Ar Taylor, Y Ao, K Knowles, L Marchetti, Sm Randriamampandry, Z Randriamanakoto

Abstract:

We study the radio spectral properties of 2094 star-forming galaxies (SFGs) by combining our early science data from the MeerKAT International GHz Tiered Extragalactic Exploration (MIGHTEE) survey with VLA, GMRT radio data, and rich ancillary data in the COSMOS field. These SFGs are selected at VLA 3 GHz, and their flux densities from MeerKAT 1.3 GHz and GMRT 325 MHz imaging data are extracted using the ‘superdeblending’ technique. The median radio spectral index is α3GHz1.3GHz=−0.80±0.01 without significant variation across the rest-frame frequencies ∼1.3–10 GHz, indicating radio spectra dominated by synchrotron radiation. On average, the radio spectrum at observer-frame 1.3–3 GHz slightly steepens with increasing stellar mass with a linear fitted slope of β = −0.08 ± 0.01, which could be explained by age-related synchrotron losses. Due to the sensitivity of GMRT 325 MHz data, we apply a further flux density cut at 3 GHz (⁠S3GHz≥50μJy) and obtain a sample of 166 SFGs with measured flux densities at 325 MHz, 1.3 GHz, and 3 GHz. On average, the radio spectrum of SFGs flattens at low frequency with the median spectral indices of α1.3GHz325MHz=−0.59+0.02−0.03 and α3.0GHz1.3GHz=−0.74+0.01−0.02⁠. At low frequency, our stacking analyses show that the radio spectrum also slightly steepens with increasing stellar mass. By comparing the far-infrared-radio correlations of SFGs based on different radio spectral indices, we find that adopting α3GHz1.3GHz for k-corrections will significantly underestimate the infrared-to-radio luminosity ratio (qIR) for >17 per cent of the SFGs with measured flux density at the three radio frequencies in our sample, because their radio spectra are significantly flatter at low frequency (0.33–1.3 GHz).

Radio spectral properties of star-forming galaxies in the MIGHTEE-COSMOS field and their impact on the far-infrared-radio correlation

(2021)

Authors:

Fangxia An, M Vaccari, Ian Smail, MJ Jarvis, IH Whittam, CL Hale, S Jin, JD Collier, E Daddi, J Delhaize, B Frank, EJ Murphy, M Prescott, S Sekhar, AR Taylor, Y Ao, K Knowles, L Marchetti, SM Randriamampandry, Z Randriamanakoto

Euclid preparation: I. The Euclid Wide Survey

(2021)

Authors:

R Scaramella, J Amiaux, Y Mellier, C Burigana, CS Carvalho, J-C Cuillandre, A Da Silva, A Derosa, J Dinis, E Maiorano, M Maris, I Tereno, R Laureijs, T Boenke, G Buenadicha, X Dupac, LM Gaspar Venancio, P Gómez-Álvarez, J Hoar, J Lorenzo Alvarez, GD Racca, G Saavedra-Criado, J Schwartz, R Vavrek, M Schirmer, H Aussel, R Azzollini, VF Cardone, M Cropper, A Ealet, B Garilli, W Gillard, BR Granett, L Guzzo, H Hoekstra, K Jahnke, T Kitching, M Meneghetti, L Miller, R Nakajima, SM Niemi, F Pasian, WJ Percival, M Sauvage, M Scodeggio, S Wachter, A Zacchei, N Aghanim, A Amara, T Auphan, N Auricchio, S Awan, A Balestra, R Bender, C Bodendorf, D Bonino, E Branchini, S Brau-Nogue, M Brescia, GP Candini, V Capobianco, C Carbone, RG Carlberg, J Carretero, R Casas, FJ Castander, M Castellano, S Cavuoti, A Cimatti, R Cledassou, G Congedo, CJ Conselice, L Conversi, Y Copin, L Corcione, A Costille, F Courbin, H Degaudenzi, M Douspis, F Dubath, CAJ Duncan, S Dusini, S Farrens, S Ferriol, P Fosalba, N Fourmanoit, M Frailis, E Franceschi, P Franzetti, M Fumana, B Gillis, C Giocoli, A Grazian, F Grupp, SVH Haugan, W Holmes, F Hormuth, P Hudelot, S Kermiche, A Kiessling, M Kilbinger, R Kohley, B Kubik, M Kümmel, M Kunz, H Kurki-Suonio, S Ligori, PB Lilje, I Lloro, O Mansutti, O Marggraf, K Markovic, F Marulli, R Massey, S Maurogordato, M Melchior, E Merlin, G Meylan, JJ Mohr, M Moresco, B Morin, L Moscardini, E Munari, RC Nichol, C Padilla, S Paltani, J Peacock, K Pedersen, V Pettorino, S Pires, M Poncet, L Popa, L Pozzetti, F Raison, R Rebolo, J Rhodes, H-W Rix, M Roncarelli, E Rossetti, R Saglia, P Schneider, T Schrabback, A Secroun, G Seidel, S Serrano, C Sirignano, G Sirri, J Skottfelt, L Stanco, JL Starck, P Tallada-Crespí, D Tavagnacco, AN Taylor, HI Teplitz, R Toledo-Moreo, F Torradeflot, M Trifoglio, EA Valentijn, L Valenziano, GA Verdoes Kleijn, Y Wang, N Welikala, J Weller, M Wetzstein, G Zamorani, J Zoubian, S Andreon, M Baldi, S Bardelli, A Boucaud, S Camera, G Fabbian, R Farinelli, J Graciá-Carpio, D Maino, E Medinaceli, S Mei, C Neissner, G Polenta, A Renzi, E Romelli, C Rosset, F Sureau, M Tenti, T Vassallo, E Zucca, C Baccigalupi, A Balaguera-Antolínez, P Battaglia, A Biviano, S Borgani, E Bozzo, R Cabanac, A Cappi, S Casas, G Castignani, C Colodro-Conde, J Coupon, HM Courtois, J Cuby, S de la Torre, S Desai, D Di Ferdinando, H Dole, M Fabricius, M Farina, PG Ferreira, F Finelli, P Flose-Reimberg, S Fotopoulou, S Galeotta, K Ganga, G Gozaliasl, IM Hook, E Keihanen, CC Kirkpatrick, P Liebing, V Lindholm, G Mainetti, M Martinelli, N Martinet, M Maturi, HJ McCracken, RB Metcalf, G Morgante, J Nightingale, A Nucita, L Patrizii, D Potter, G Riccio, AG Sánchez, D Sapone, JA Schewtschenko, M Schultheis, V Scottez, R Teyssier, I Tutusaus, J Valiviita, M Viel, W Vriend, L Whittaker

Euclidpreparation

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 655 (2021) A44-A44

Authors:

A Pocino, I Tutusaus, FJ Castander, P Fosalba, M Crocce, A Porredon, S Camera, V Cardone, S Casas, T Kitching, F Lacasa, M Martinelli, A Pourtsidou, Z Sakr, S Andreon, N Auricchio, C Baccigalupi, A Balaguera-Antolínez, M Baldi, A Balestra, S Bardelli, R Bender, A Biviano, C Bodendorf, D Bonino

Abstract:

Photometric redshifts (photo-zs) are one of the main ingredients in the analysis of cosmological probes. Their accuracy particularly affects the results of the analyses of galaxy clustering with photometrically selected galaxies (GCph) and weak lensing. In the next decade, space missions such as Euclid will collect precise and accurate photometric measurements for millions of galaxies. These data should be complemented with upcoming ground-based observations to derive precise and accurate photo-zs. In this article we explore how the tomographic redshift binning and depth of ground-based observations will affect the cosmological constraints expected from the Euclid mission. We focus on GCph and extend the study to include galaxy-galaxy lensing (GGL). We add a layer of complexity to the analysis by simulating several realistic photo-z distributions based on the Euclid Consortium Flagship simulation and using a machine learning photo-z algorithm. We then use the Fisher matrix formalism together with these galaxy samples to study the cosmological constraining power as a function of redshift binning, survey depth, and photo-z accuracy. We find that bins with an equal width in redshift provide a higher figure of merit (FoM) than equipopulated bins and that increasing the number of redshift bins from ten to 13 improves the FoM by 35% and 15% for GCph and its combination with GGL, respectively. For GCph, an increase in the survey depth provides a higher FoM. However, when we include faint galaxies beyond the limit of the spectroscopic training data, the resulting FoM decreases because of the spurious photo-zs. When combining GCph and GGL, the number density of the sample, which is set by the survey depth, is the main factor driving the variations in the FoM. Adding galaxies at faint magnitudes and high redshift increases the FoM, even when they are beyond the spectroscopic limit, since the number density increase compensates for the photo-z degradation in this case. We conclude that there is more information that can be extracted beyond the nominal ten tomographic redshift bins of Euclid and that we should be cautious when adding faint galaxies into our sample since they can degrade the cosmological constraints