pop-cosmos: Disentangling galaxy properties from observables using data-driven approaches

ArXiv 2606.11308 (2026)

Authors:

Benedict Van den Bussche, Sinan Deger, Hiranya V Peiris, Stephen Thorp, Daniel J Mortlock, Boris Leistedt, Anik Halder, Madalina N Tudorache, Gurjeet Jagwani

Erratum: “Cloud-scale Gas Properties, Depletion Times, and Star Formation Efficiency per Freefall Time in PHANGS–ALMA” (2025, ApJ, 985, 14)

The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 1003:2 (2026) 248

Authors:

Adam K Leroy, Jiayi Sun, Sharon Meidt, Oscar Agertz, I-Da Chiang, Jindra Gensior, Simon CO Glover, Oleg Y Gnedin, Annie Hughes, Eva Schinnerer, Ashley T Barnes, Frank Bigiel, Alberto D Bolatto, Dario Colombo, Jakob den Brok, Mélanie Chevance, Ryan Chown, Cosima Eibensteiner, Damian R Gleis, Kathryn Grasha, Jonathan D Henshaw, Ralf S Klessen, Eric W Koch, Elias K Oakes, Hsi-An Pan, Miguel Querejeta, Erik Rosolowsky, Toshiki Saito, Karin Sandstrom, Sumit K Sarbadhicary, Yu-Hsuan Teng, Antonio Usero, Dyas Utomo, Thomas G Williams

HETDEX Public Data Release 1: Source Catalog 2 and Data Cubes from ∼90 deg2 of Integral-field Optical Spectroscopy

The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series American Astronomical Society 284:2 (2026) 67

Authors:

Erin Mentuch Cooper, Karl Gebhardt, Dustin Davis, Chenxu 辰旭 Liu 刘, Barbara G Castanheira, Owen Chase, Óscar A Chávez Ortiz, Robin Ciardullo, Olivia Curtis, Delaney A Dunne, Neal J Evans, Daniel J Farrow, Maximilian Fabricius, Steven L Finkelstein, Caryl Gronwall, Nathaniel J Hamme, Gary J Hill, Lindsay R House, Matt J Jarvis, Donghui Jeong, Andreas Kelz, Eiichiro Komatsu, Mahan Mirza Khanlari, Hasti Khoraminezhad, Wolfram Kollatschny, Maja Lujan Niemeyer, Hanshin Lee, Phillip MacQueen, Deeshani Mitra, Shiro Mukae, Masami Ouchi, Jennifer Poppe, Meredith C Powell, Mahdi Qezlou, Shun Saito, Donald P Schneider, Laurel Weiss, Lutz Wisotzki, Gregory R Zeimann

Abstract:

The Hobby–Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment (HETDEX) is a wide-field, integral-field spectroscopic survey designed to map the large-scale distribution of Lyα-emitting galaxies (LAEs) at 1.88 < z < 3.52 and constrain dark energy at cosmic noon. Using the 10 m Hobby–Eberly Telescope and the Visible Integral-Field Replicable Unit (IFU) Spectrograph, HETDEX obtains >35,000 spectra per exposure over 3500–5500 Å at R ∼ 800 with ∼1.″8 image quality, enabling an untargeted census of emission-line galaxies across 540 deg2. We present HETDEX Public Data Release 1 (PDR1), comprising 431,713 IFU observations covering 86.67 deg2 of noncontiguous sky in the Spring (13h, +51°) and Fall (1 .h 5, 0°) fields, along with legacy regions (Cosmic Evolution Survey, Great Observations Origins Deep Survey North, North Ecliptic Pole, SA22). PDR1 includes the HETDEX Public Source Catalog 2 (HPSC2), an expanded and reprocessed version of E. Mentuch Cooper et al. (2023) incorporating four additional years of data, improved quality control, and new machine learning classifiers. HPSC2 contains 426,654 LAEs, 491,411 [O II] emitters, 19,457 low-z galaxies, 18,303 active galactic nuclei, and 150,608 stars, providing coordinates, redshifts or stellar velocities, and 1D spectra for each source. Because the data cubes use local sky subtraction optimized for faint emission-line detection, they are not suited for absolute surface-brightness measurements or very extended nearby galaxies. Appendix materials include the full detection catalog, the 1.6 million–candidate LAE sample, and raw detection databases. All products are publicly accessible through the HETDEX data portal (https://hetdex.org/data-results/), including access to a public JupyterLab. HPSC2 is also publicly available via Zenodo (doi:10.5281/zenodo.19581262).

The NIRISS PASSAGE Spectroscopic Redshift Catalog in COSMOS

The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series American Astronomical Society 284:2 (2026) 64

Authors:

Mason S Huberty, Kalina V Nedkova, Zahra Sattari, Vihang Mehta, Claudia Scarlata, Marc Rafelski, Matthew J Hayes, Peter J Watson, Ayan Acharyya, Jacob Levine, Benedetta Vulcani, Alexandra Le Reste, Farhanul Hasan, James Colbert, Michele Trenti, Xin Wang, Axel Runnholm, Matthew A Malkan, Andrew J Bunker, Anahita Alavi, Hakim Atek, Andrew J Battisti, Y Sophia Dai, Keunho Kim, Alaina Henry, Michael J Rutkowski, Hollis Akins, Caitlin M Casey, Maximilien Franco, Santosh Harish, Jeyhan S Kartaltepe, Anton Koekemoer, Daizhong Liu, Henry McCracken, Jason Rhodes, Brant Robertson, Marko Shuntov

Abstract:

We present the Parallel Application of Slitless Spectroscopy to Analyze Galaxy Evolution (PASSAGE) spectroscopic redshift catalog in the COSMOS field. PASSAGE is a JWST Cycle 1 Near Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph (or NIRISS) wide-field slitless spectroscopy pure-parallel survey, obtaining near-infrared spectra of thousands of extragalactic sources. Fifteen out of 63 PASSAGE fields fall within the Hubble Space Telescope COSMOS footprint, of which 11 overlap with COSMOS-Web, a JWST treasury survey providing additional space-based photometry. We present our custom line-finding algorithm and visual inspection effort used to identify emission lines and derive the spectroscopic redshifts for line-emitting sources in PASSAGE. The line-finding algorithm identifies between ∼200 and 950 line-emitting candidates per field, of which typically 47% were identified as true emission lines post visual inspection. We identify 2183 emission-line sources at 0.08 ≲ z ≲ 4.7, 1896 of which have available COSMOS photometric redshifts. We find excellent redshift agreement between the COSMOS photometric redshifts and the PASSAGE spectroscopic redshifts for strong (signal-to-noise ratio > 5), multi-line-emitting sources. This agreement weakens for PASSAGE single-line emitters with ambiguous identities. These single-line emitters are likely misidentified around 18% of the time based on comparisons to photometric redshifts. We derive stellar masses using PASSAGE photometry and spectroscopic redshifts, in broad agreement with existing COSMOS-Web stellar masses, but with some discrepancy driven by redshift disagreements. We publicly release this spectroscopic redshift catalog, which will enable community-led science in prime extragalactic fields and serve as a crucial dataset for validating Euclid and Roman spectroscopy.

Probing the environments of FRI and FRII radio galaxies in LoTSS DR2 with galaxy clusters

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 710 (2026) A326-A326

Authors:

Tong Pan, Yuming Fu, HJA Rottgering, JMGHJ de Jong, MJ Hardcastle, B Mingo, L Clews, M Magliocchetti, JW Petley, Bohan Yue

Abstract:

Aims. The origin of the morphological dichotomy between Fanaroff-Riley Class I (FRI) and Class II (FRII) radio galaxies has long been debated. In this study, we investigate whether the cluster-scale environment plays a significant role in shaping the morphology of FRIs and FRIIs. Methods. Using the new morphologically classified catalogue from the second data release of the LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey (LoTSS DR2), we construct two samples at z  < 0.4: a volume-limited sample with L 144 > 4 × 10 24 W Hz −1 and a paired sample in which each FRII is matched to the nearest FRI in luminosity and redshift. We cross-match these samples with a recent galaxy cluster catalogue based on the DESI Legacy Imaging Survey. A galaxy is considered associated with a cluster with M 500  > 0.47 × 10 14   M ⊙ if the redshift difference between the galaxy and the cluster centre is below 0.01, and the projected distance between the two is smaller than 2 R 500 . Results. In the volume-limited sample, 48.6 −1.8 +1.8 % of FRIs and 30.6 −2.3 +2.5 % of FRIIs are associated with clusters. In the paired sample, 45.6 −3.1 +3.1 % of FRIs and 32.6 −2.8 +3.0 % of FRIIs are associated with clusters. This difference in cluster match fractions between FRIs and FRIIs in both samples becomes more pronounced at higher radio luminosities ( L 144 MHz > 10 26 W Hz −1 ). In the volume-limited sample, 55.6 −9.6 +9.2 % of luminous FRIs and 19.0 −4.6 +5.7 % of luminous FRIIs are associated with clusters. In the paired sample, 50.0 −12.9 +12.9 % of luminous FRIs and 6.7 −3.9 +9.5 % of luminous FRIIs are associated with clusters. Nevertheless, those FRIs and FRIIs that are associated with clusters show similar properties. In particular, the distributions of radio luminosity and stellar mass as functions of cluster richness and M 500 are similar for FRIs and FRIIs. The radial density profiles of cluster-associated FRIs and FRIIs both peak at 0.5 × R 500 and decline beyond R 500 , showing very similar spatial distributions within clusters. Furthermore, in the volume-limited sample, 74.8 −2.3 +2.2 % of cluster-associated FRIs and 61.9 −4.6 +4.4 % of cluster-associated FRIIs are identified as brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs). In the paired sample, 78.1 −4.0 +3.5 % of cluster-associated FRIs and 65.9 −5.3 +4.9 % of cluster-associated FRIIs are identified as BCGs. The median properties of these FRI-BCGs and FRII-BCGs, as well as those of their host clusters, do not show significant differences. Conclusions. Compared to FRIs, FRIIs are less frequently found in galaxy clusters, particularly at high radio luminosities. This pattern may be explained by the jet disruption scenario, in which the dense gas in galaxy clusters can slow down or disturb radio jets, making it more difficult for powerful FRII structures to form or remain stable. However, when FRIs and FRIIs do reside in clusters, they appear to inhabit similar environments in terms of richness, mass, and radial position. These findings suggest that, while the cluster-scale environment may influence the cluster match fraction, the morphological distinction between FRIs and FRIIs is unlikely to be primarily driven by cluster-scale properties alone. Improved estimates of cluster richness and mass will help to further clarify the extent to which the cluster environment influences the radio morphology of FRIs and FRIIs.