Depot Dependent Effects of Dexamethasone on Gene Expression in Human Omental and Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose Tissues from Obese Women.

PloS one 11:12 (2016) e0167337

Authors:

R Taylor Pickering, Mi-Jeong Lee, Kalypso Karastergiou, Adam Gower, Susan K Fried

Abstract:

Glucocorticoids promote fat accumulation in visceral compared to subcutaneous depots, but the molecular mechanisms involved remain poorly understood. To identify long-term changes in gene expression that are differentially sensitive or responsive to glucocorticoids in these depots, paired samples of human omental (Om) and abdominal subcutaneous (Abdsc) adipose tissues obtained from obese women during elective surgery were cultured with the glucocorticoid receptor agonist dexamethasone (Dex, 0, 1, 10, 25 and 1000 nM) for 7 days. Dex regulated 32% of the 19,741 genes on the array, while 53% differed by Depot and 2.5% exhibited a Depot*Dex concentration interaction. Gene set enrichment analysis showed Dex regulation of the expected metabolic and inflammatory pathways in both depots. Cluster analysis of the 460 transcripts that exhibited an interaction of Depot and Dex concentration revealed sets of mRNAs for which the responses to Dex differed in magnitude, sensitivity or direction between the two depots as well as mRNAs that responded to Dex only in one depot. These transcripts were also clearly depot different in fresh adipose tissue and are implicated in processes that could affect adipose tissue distribution or functions (e.g. adipogenesis, triacylglycerol synthesis and storage, insulin action). Elucidation of the mechanisms underlying the depot differences in the effect of Dex on the expression of specific genes and pathways that regulate adipose function may offer novel insights into understanding the biology of visceral adipose tissues and their links to metabolic health.

The Balance of Power: Accretion and Feedback in Stellar Mass Black Holes

Springer International Publishing (2016) 65-100

Authors:

Rob Fender, Teo Muñoz-Darias

The Balance of Power: Accretion and Feedback in Stellar Mass Black Holes

Chapter in Astrophysical Black Holes, Springer Nature 905 (2016) 65-100

Authors:

Rob Fender, Teo Muñoz-Darias

Emission-rotation correlation in pulsars: new discoveries with optimal techniques

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 456:2 (2015) 1374-1393

Authors:

PR Brook, Aris Karastergiou, S Johnston, M Kerr, RM Shannon, Stephen Roberts

Abstract:

Pulsars are known to display short-term variability. Recently, examples of longer term emission variability have emerged that are often correlated with changes in the rotational properties of the pulsar. To further illuminate this relationship, we have developed techniques to identify emission and rotation variability in pulsar data, and determine correlations between the two. Individual observations may be too noisy to identify subtle changes in the pulse profile. We use Gaussian process (GP) regression to model noisy observations and produce a continuous map of pulse profile variability. Generally, multiple observing epochs are required to obtain the pulsar spin frequency derivative (ν). GP regression is, therefore, also used to obtain ν, under the hypothesis that pulsar timing noise is primarily caused by unmodelled changes in ν. Our techniques distinguish between two types of variability: changes in the total flux density versus changes in the pulse shape. We have applied these techniques to 168 pulsars observed by the Parkes radio telescope, and see that although variations in flux density are ubiquitous, substantial changes in the shape of the pulse profile are rare.We reproduce previously published results and present examples of profile shape changing in seven pulsars; in particular, a clear new example of correlated changes in profile shape and rotation is found in PSR J1602-5100. In the shape changing pulsars, a more complex picture than the previously proposed two state model emerges. We conclude that our simple assumption that all timing noise can be interpreted as ν variability is insufficient to explain our data set.

Orbital and superorbital variability of LS I +61 303 at low radio frequencies with GMRT and LOFAR

(2015)

Authors:

B Marcote, M Ribó, JM Paredes, CH Ishwara-Chandra, JD Swinbank, JW Broderick, S Markoff, R Fender, RAMJ Wijers, GG Pooley, AJ Stewart, ME Bell, RP Breton, D Carbone, S Corbel, J Eislöffel, H Falcke, J-M Grießmeier, M Kuniyoshi, M Pietka, A Rowlinson, M Serylak, AJ van der Horst, J van Leeuwen, MW Wise, P Zarka