Echoes of the past: ultra-high energy cosmic rays accelerated by radio galaxies, scattered by starburst galaxies

ArXiv 2108.08879 (2021)

Authors:

Anthony Bell, James Matthews

The 2019 outburst of the 2005 classical nova V1047 Cen: a record breaking dwarf nova outburst or a new phenomenon?

(2021)

Authors:

E Aydi, KV Sokolovsky, JS Bright, E Tremou, MM Nyamai, A Evans, J Strader, L Chomiuk, G Myers, F-J Hambsch, KL Page, DAH Buckley, CE Woodward, FM Walter, P Mróz, PJ Vallely, TR Geballe, DPK Banerjee, RD Gehrz, RP Fender, M Gromadzki, A Kawash, C Knigge, K Mukai, U Munari, M Orio, VARM Ribeiro, JL Sokoloski, S Starrfield, A Udalski, PA Woudt

Multifrequency study of the peculiar pulsars PSR B0919+06 and PSR B1859+07

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) 506:4 (2021) 5836-5847

Authors:

KM Rajwade, BBP Perera, BW Stappers, J Roy, A Karastergiou, JM Rankin

Southern African Large Telescope Spectroscopy of BL Lacs for the CTA project

(2021)

Authors:

E Kasai, P Goldoni, M Backes, G Cotter, S Pita, C Boisson, DA Williams, F D'Ammando, E Lindfors, U Barres de Almeida, W Max-Moerbeck, V Navarro-Aranguiz, J Becerra-Gonzalez, O Hervet, J-P Lenain, H Sol, S Wagner

TeV emission of galactic plane sources with HAWC and H.E.S.S.

Astrophysical Journal IOP Publishing 917:1 (2021) 6

Authors:

H Abdalla, F Aharonian, F Ait Benkhali, Thomas Armstrong, G Cotter, J Davies

Abstract:

The High Altitude Water Cherenkov (HAWC) observatory and the High Energy Stereoscopic System (H.E.S.S.) are two leading instruments in the ground-based very-high-energy γ-ray domain. HAWC employs the water Cherenkov detection (WCD) technique, while H.E.S.S. is an array of Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes (IACTs). The two facilities therefore differ in multiple aspects, including their observation strategy, the size of their field of view, and their angular resolution, leading to different analysis approaches. Until now, it has been unclear if the results of observations by both types of instruments are consistent: several of the recently discovered HAWC sources have been followed up by IACTs, resulting in a confirmed detection only in a minority of cases. With this paper, we go further and try to resolve the tensions between previous results by performing a new analysis of the H.E.S.S. Galactic plane survey data, applying an analysis technique comparable between H.E.S.S. and HAWC. Events above 1 TeV are selected for both data sets, the point-spread function of H.E.S.S. is broadened to approach that of HAWC, and a similar background estimation method is used. This is the first detailed comparison of the Galactic plane observed by both instruments. H.E.S.S. can confirm the γ-ray emission of four HAWC sources among seven previously undetected by IACTs, while the three others have measured fluxes below the sensitivity of the H.E.S.S. data set. Remaining differences in the overall γ-ray flux can be explained by the systematic uncertainties. Therefore, we confirm a consistent view of the γ-ray sky between WCD and IACT techniques.