The Spectral Evolution of AT 2018dyb and the Presence of Metal Lines in Tidal Disruption Events
The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 887:2 (2019) 218
The performance of photometric reverberation mapping at high redshift and the reliability of damped random walk models
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 492:3 (2019) 3940-3959
Abstract:
<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title> <jats:p>Accurate methods for reverberation mapping using photometry are highly sought after since they are inherently less resource intensive than spectroscopic techniques. However, the effectiveness of photometric reverberation mapping for estimating black hole masses is sparsely investigated at redshifts higher than z ≈ 0.04. Furthermore, photometric methods frequently assume a damped random walk (DRW) model, which may not be universally applicable. We perform photometric reverberation mapping using the javelin photometric DRW model for the QSO SDSS-J144645.44+625304.0 at z = 0.351 and estimate the Hβ lag of $65^{+6}_{-1}$ d and black hole mass of $10^{8.22^{+0.13}_{-0.15}}\, \mathrm{M_{\odot }}$. An analysis of the reliability of photometric reverberation mapping, conducted using many thousands of simulated CARMA process light curves, shows that we can recover the input lag to within 6 per cent on average given our target’s observed signal-to-noise of &gt;20 and average cadence of 14 d (even when DRW is not applicable). Furthermore, we use our suite of simulated light curves to deconvolve aliases and artefacts from our QSO’s posterior probability distribution, increasing the signal-to-noise on the lag by a factor of ∼2.2. We exceed the signal-to-noise of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project (SDSS-RM) campaign with a quarter of the observing time per object, resulting in a ∼200 per cent increase in signal-to-noise efficiency over SDSS-RM.</jats:p>Estimating the Molecular Gas Mass of Low-redshift Galaxies from a Combination of Mid-infrared Luminosity and Optical Properties
The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 887:2 (2019) 172-172
A detailed non-LTE analysis of LB-1: Revised parameters and surface abundances
(2019)
Determining the $^{56}$Ni distribution of type Ia supernovae from observations within days of explosion
(2019)