The performance of photometric reverberation mapping at high redshift and the reliability of damped random walk models

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 492:3 (2019) 3940-3959

Authors:

MATTHEW JARVIS, SC Read, DJB Smith, MJ Jarvis, G Gürkan

Abstract:

<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title> <jats:p>Accurate methods for reverberation mapping using photometry are highly sought after since they are inherently less resource intensive than spectroscopic techniques. However, the effectiveness of photometric reverberation mapping for estimating black hole masses is sparsely investigated at redshifts higher than z ≈ 0.04. Furthermore, photometric methods frequently assume a damped random walk (DRW) model, which may not be universally applicable. We perform photometric reverberation mapping using the javelin photometric DRW model for the QSO SDSS-J144645.44+625304.0 at z = 0.351 and estimate the Hβ lag of $65^{+6}_{-1}$ d and black hole mass of $10^{8.22^{+0.13}_{-0.15}}\, \mathrm{M_{\odot }}$. An analysis of the reliability of photometric reverberation mapping, conducted using many thousands of simulated CARMA process light curves, shows that we can recover the input lag to within 6 per cent on average given our target’s observed signal-to-noise of &amp;gt;20 and average cadence of 14 d (even when DRW is not applicable). Furthermore, we use our suite of simulated light curves to deconvolve aliases and artefacts from our QSO’s posterior probability distribution, increasing the signal-to-noise on the lag by a factor of ∼2.2. We exceed the signal-to-noise of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project (SDSS-RM) campaign with a quarter of the observing time per object, resulting in a ∼200 per cent increase in signal-to-noise efficiency over SDSS-RM.</jats:p>

Estimating the Molecular Gas Mass of Low-redshift Galaxies from a Combination of Mid-infrared Luminosity and Optical Properties

The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 887:2 (2019) 172-172

Authors:

Yang Gao, Ting Xiao, Cheng Li, Xue-Jian Jiang, Qing-Hua Tan, Yu Gao, Christine D Wilson, Martin Bureau, Amélie Saintonge, José R Sánchez-Gallego, Toby Brown, Christopher JR Clark, Ho Seong Hwang, Isabella Lamperti, Lin Lin, Lijie Liu, Dengrong Lu, Hsi-An Pan, Jixian Sun, Thomas G Williams

A detailed non-LTE analysis of LB-1: Revised parameters and surface abundances

(2019)

Authors:

S Simón-Díaz, J Maíz Apellániz, DJ Lennon, JI González Hernández, C Allende Prieto, N Castro, A de Burgos, PL Dufton, A Herrero, B Toledo-Padrón, SJ Smartt

Determining the $^{56}$Ni distribution of type Ia supernovae from observations within days of explosion

(2019)

Authors:

MR Magee, K Maguire, R Kotak, SA Sim, JH Gillanders, SJ Prentice, K Skillen

LSQ13ddu: A rapidly-evolving stripped-envelope supernova with early circumstellar interaction signatures

(2019)

Authors:

Peter Clark, Kate Maguire, Cosimo Inserra, Simon Prentice, Stephen J Smartt, Carlos Contreras, Griffin Hossenizadeh, Eric Y Hsiao, Erkki Kankare, Mansi Kasliwal, Peter Nugent, Melissa Shahbandeh, Charles Baltay, David Rabinowitz, Iair Arcavi, Chris Ashall, Christopher R Burns, Emma Callis, Ting-Wan Chen, Tiara Diamond, Morgan Fraser, D Andrew Howell, Emir Karamehmetoglu, Rubina Kotak, Joseph Lyman, Nidia Morrell, Mark Phillips, Giuliano Pignata, Miika Pursiainen, Jesper Sollerman, Maximilian Stritzinger, Mark Sullivan, David Young