No detection of methane on Mars from early ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter observations

Nature Springer Nature 568:2019 (2019) 517-520

Authors:

O Korablev, AC Vandaele, F Montmessin, AA Fedorova, A Trokhimovskiy, F Forget, F Lefèvre, F Daerden, IR Thomas, L Trompet, JT Erwin, S Aoki, S Robert, L Neary, S Viscardy, AV Grigoriev, NI Ignatiev, A Shakun, A Patrakeev, DA Belyaev, J-L Bertaux, KS Olsen, L Baggio, J Alday, YS Ivanov, B Ristic, J Mason, Y Willame, C Depiesse, L Hetey, S Berkenbosch, R Clairquin, C Queirolo, B Beeckman, E Neefs, G Bellucci, J-J López-Moreno, Colin Wilson, G Etiope, L Zelenyi, H Svedhem, JL Vago

Abstract:

The detection of methane on Mars has been interpreted as indicating that geochemical or biotic activities could persist on Mars today1. A number of different measurements of methane show evidence of transient, locally elevated methane concentrations and seasonal variations in background methane concentrations2,3,4,5. These measurements, however, are difficult to reconcile with our current understanding of the chemistry and physics of the Martian atmosphere6,7, which—given methane’s lifetime of several centuries—predicts an even, well mixed distribution of methane1,6,8. Here we report highly sensitive measurements of the atmosphere of Mars in an attempt to detect methane, using the ACS and NOMAD instruments onboard the ESA-Roscosmos ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter from April to August 2018. We did not detect any methane over a range of latitudes in both hemispheres, obtaining an upper limit for methane of about 0.05 parts per billion by volume, which is 10 to 100 times lower than previously reported positive detections2,4. We suggest that reconciliation between the present findings and the background methane concentrations found in the Gale crater4 would require an unknown process that can rapidly remove or sequester methane from the lower atmosphere before it spreads globally.

No detection of methane on Mars from early ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter observations

Nature Springer Nature (2019)

Authors:

Oleg Korablev, Ann Carine Vandaele, Franck Montmessin, Anna A Fedorova, Alexander Trokhimovskiy, François Forget, Franck Lefèvre, Frank Daerden, Ian R Thomas, Loïc Trompet, Justin T Erwin, Shohei Aoki, Séverine Robert, Lori Neary, Sébastien Viscardy, Alexey V Grigoriev, Nikolay I Ignatiev, Alexey Shakun, Andrey Patrakeev, Denis A Belyaev, Jean-Loup Bertaux, Kevin S Olsen, Lucio Baggio, Juan Alday, Yuriy S Ivanov, Bojan Ristic, Jon Mason, Yannick Willame, Cédric Depiesse, Laszlo Hetey, Sophie Berkenbosch, Roland Clairquin, Claudio Queirolo, Bram Beeckman, Eddy Neefs, Manish R Patel, Giancarlo Bellucci, Jose-Juan López-Moreno, Colin F Wilson, Giuseppe Etiope, Lev Zelenyi, Håkan Svedhem, Jorge L Vago

Particle Size Effects on Mid‐Infrared Spectra of Lunar Analog Minerals in a Simulated Lunar Environment

Journal of Geophysical Research Planets American Geophysical Union (AGU) 124:4 (2019) 970-988

Authors:

KA Shirley, TD Glotch

Detecting Earth-like Biosignatures on Rocky Exoplanets around Nearby Stars with Ground-based Extremely Large Telescopes

(2019)

Authors:

Mercedes López-Morales, Thayne Currie, Johanna Teske, Eric Gaidos, Eliza Kempton, Jared Males, Nikole Lewis, Benjamin V Rackham, Sagi Ben-Ami, Jayne Birkby, David Charbonneau, Laird Close, Jeff Crane, Courtney Dressing, Cynthia Froning, Yasuhiro Hasegawa, Quinn Konopacky, Ravi K Kopparapu, Dimitri Mawet, Bertrand Mennesson, Ramses Ramirez, Deno Stelter, Andrew Szentgyorgyi, Ji Wang

New Horizons Photometry of Pluto's Moon Charon

The Astrophysical Journal Letters American Astronomical Society 874:1 (2019) l3

Authors:

BJ Buratti, MD Hicks, JH Hillier, AJ Verbiscer, M Abgarian, JD Hofgartner, TR Lauer, WM Grundy, SA Stern, HA Weaver, CJA Howett, LA Young, A Cheng, RA Beyer, CM Lisse, K Ennico, CB Olkin, SJ Robbins