Planet Hunters IX. KIC 8462852-where's the flux?

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY 457:4 (2016) 3988-4004

Authors:

TS Boyajian, DM LaCourse, SA Rappaport, D Fabrycky, DA Fischer, D Gandolfi, GM Kennedy, H Korhonen, MC Liu, A Moor, K Olah, K Vida, MC Wyatt, WMJ Best, J Brewer, F Ciesla, B Csak, HJ Deeg, TJ Dupuy, G Handler, K Heng, SB Howell, ST Ishikawa, J Kovacs, T Kozakis, L Kriskovics, J Lehtinen, C Lintott, S Lynn, D Nespral, S Nikbakhsh, K Schawinski, JR Schmitt, AM Smith, G Szabo, R Szabo, J Viuho, J Wang, A Weiksnar, M Bosch, JL Connors, S Goodman, G Green, AJ Hoekstra, T Jebson, KJ Jek, MR Omohundro, HM Schwengeler, A Szewczyk

Science learning via participation in online citizen science

Journal of Science Communication Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati 15:3 (2016) A07

Authors:

Karen Masters, Eun Y Oh, Joe Cox, Brooke Simmons, Christopher Lintott, Gary Graham, Anita Greenhill, Kate Holmes

Abstract:

We investigate the development of scientific content knowledge of volunteers participating in online citizen science projects in the Zooniverse (www.zooniverse.org). We use econometric methods to test how measures of project participation relate to success in a science quiz, controlling for factors known to correlate with scientific knowledge. Citizen scientists believe they are learning about both the content and processes of science through their participation. We don’t directly test the latter, but we find evidence to support the former - that more actively engaged participants perform better in a project-specific science knowledge quiz, even after controlling for their general science knowledge. We interpret this as evidence of learning of science content inspired by participation in online citizen science.

Low-radio-frequency eclipses of the redback pulsar J2215+5135 observed in the image plane with LOFAR

(2016)

Authors:

JW Broderick, RP Fender, RP Breton, AJ Stewart, A Rowlinson, JD Swinbank, JWT Hessels, TD Staley, AJ van der Horst, ME Bell, D Carbone, Y Cendes, S Corbel, J Eislöffel, H Falcke, J-M Grießmeier, TE Hassall, P Jonker, M Kramer, M Kuniyoshi, CJ Law, S Markoff, GJ Molenaar, M Pietka, LHA Scheers, M Serylak, BW Stappers, S ter Veen, J van Leeuwen, RAMJ Wijers, R Wijnands, MW Wise, P Zarka

Radio continuum surveys and galaxy evolution: modelling and simulations

Proceedings of Science Sissa Medialab 267 (2016) 1-12

Authors:

Adrianne Slyz, Julien Devriendt, Matthew Jarvis, Y Dubois, C Pichon

Abstract:

We predict the evolution of the radio continuum sky at 1.4 GHz from the Horizon-AGN Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) cosmological hydrodynamical simulation of a cubic volume of the Universe 100h−1 Mpc on a side. With empirically motivated models for the radio continuum emission due to both star formation and Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN), we estimate the contribution of each of these processes to the local radio continuum luminosity function (LF) and describe its evolution up to redshift 4. Despite the simplicity of these models, we find that our predictions for the local luminosity function are fairly consistent with Mauch & Sadler (2007) observations, with the faint end of the luminosity function dominated by star forming galaxies and the bright end by radio loud AGNs. At redshift one, a decent match to Smolcic et al. (2009) VLA data in the COSMOS field can only be achieved when we account for radio continuum emission from AGNs. We predict that the strongest evolution across the peak epoch of cosmic activity happens for low luminosity star forming galaxies L1.4GHz < 1022 W Hz−1 , whose contribution rises until z ∼ 2 and declines at higher redshifts. The contribution of low luminosity AGNs L1.4GHz < 1022 W Hz−1 steadily declines from z = 0 throughout the redshift range, whilst that of radio loud objects with luminosities in the range 1022 W Hz−1 < L1.4GHz < 1024 W Hz−1 rises dramatically until z = 4. Finally, high-luminosity radio loud AGNs, with L1.4GHz > 1024 W Hz−1 show surprisingly little evolution from z = 0 to z = 4.

Erratum: On the diversity of superluminous supernovae: ejected mass as the dominant factor

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) 457:3 (2016) 2514-2515

Authors:

M Nicholl, SJ Smartt, A Jerkstrand, C Inserra, SA Sim, T-W Chen, S Benetti, M Fraser, A Gal-Yam, E Kankare, K Maguire, K Smith, M Sullivan, S Valenti, DR Young, C Baltay, FE Bauer, S Baumont, D Bersier, M-T Botticella, M Childress, M Dennefeld, M Della Valle, N Elias-Rosa, U Feindt, L Galbany, E Hadjiyska, L Le Guillou, G Leloudas, P Mazzali, R McKinnon, J Polshaw, D Rabinowitz, S Rostami, R Scalzo, BP Schmidt, S Schulze, J Sollerman, F Taddia, F Yuan