Climate dynamics

Abstract:

Plain Language Summary: The Quasi‐biennial Oscillation (QBO) dominates the variability of the tropical atmosphere between 16 and 50 km above the surface. It manifests most strongly as downward propagating zonal wind variations exceeding 25 m/s with an average period of ∼ ${\sim} $ 28 months. Twice in the past 10 years the QBO regular phase evolution has been disrupted after 60 years of no disruptions, motivating our analysis of the role of greenhouse gases, aerosols, ozone, volcanic eruptions, and solar variability for historical changes in the QBO. We find prominent roles for four of these five external forcings, and specifically both rising greenhouse gases and volcanic eruptions help induce disruption events.

Abstract:

<jats:p>Abstract. The Atmospheric Processes And their Role in Climate (APARC) Quasi-Biennial Oscillation initiative (QBOi) has conducted new experiments to explore the modulation of the QBO by El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). This paper provides an overview of the experimental design and investigates the modulation of the QBO by ENSO using nine climate models used in QBOi. A key finding is a consistent lengthening of the QBO period during La Niña compared to El Niño across all models, aligning with observational evidence. Although several models simulate QBO periods that deviate from the observed mean of approximately 28 months, the relative difference between La Niña and El Niño remains interpretable within each model. The simulated QBO periods during La Niña tend to be longer than those during El Niño, although, in most models, the differences are small compared to that observed. However, the magnitude of this lengthening shows large inter-model differences. By contrast, even the sign of the ENSO effect on QBO amplitude varies among models. Models employing variable parameterized gravity wave sources generally exhibit greater sensitivity of the QBO amplitude to the presence of ENSO than those models using fixed sources. The models capture key observed ENSO-related characteristics, including a weaker Walker circulation and increased equatorial precipitation during El Niño compared to La Niña, as well as a characteristic response in zonal mean zonal wind and temperature. All models also simulate stronger equatorial tropical upwelling in El Niño compared to La Niña up to ∼ 10 hPa, consistent with ERA5 reanalysis. These modulations influence the propagation and filtering of gravity waves. Notably, models with variable parameterized gravity wave sources show stronger wave forcing during El Niño, potentially explaining the shorter QBO period modulation in these models. Further investigation into the complex interplay between ENSO, gravity waves, and the QBO can contribute to improved model formulations. </jats:p>

Abstract:

Barotropic instability represents a class of instabilities, usually of parallel shear flows, for which gravity and buoyancy play a negligible role, at least in their energetics. It is not restricted to purely barotropic fluids (for which ρ = ρ(p), where ρ is density and p is pressure) but can also apply to flows which are stratified and exhibit vertical shear, often leading to instabilities with mixed barotropic and baroclinic characteristics. The primary attribute of barotropic instability is usually taken to be the dominance of energy exchanges in which the kinetic energy of a perturbation grows principally at the expense of the kinetic energy of the basic state. Here we present an introduction to the basic mechanisms involved and the factors that determine the necessary and/or sufficient conditions for instability. Several examples are presented and the occurrence and subsequent nonlinear evolution of the instability is illustrated with reference to both laboratory experiments and observations in the atmospheres and oceans of the Earth and other planets in the Solar System.

Abstract:

Plain Language Summary: Midlatitude storms transport water vapor poleward and upward. When ascending, the air cools, causing the vapor to condense, releasing latent heat. The latent heating boosts the ascent in which it occurs and amplifies the storms originally responsible for the heating. This circular chain of events couples latent heating and storms in a nonlinear relationship we call the latent heating feedback. We simulate an atmosphere where latent heating is static and not a consequence of warm, moist air ascending. Comparing this to an atmosphere with realistic latent heating, we show that realistic latent heating leads to more intense storms traveling further poleward, especially west of North America and Europe. Simultaneously, the longitudinally averaged jet streams and storms respond by retracting toward the equator, leaving reduced westerlies and a double jet tendency over North America and Europe. Previous works tend to focus on the effect of latent heating on the average atmospheric state. Our work shows that this effect is only part of the story and that the latent heating effect on storms directly causes regional differences that climate models struggle with.

Abstract:

Plain Language Summary: The Pacific Northwest (PNW) experienced a record‐breaking heatwave during the summer of 2021, resulting in significant adverse effects on both human society and ecosystems. A heavy rainfall band was observed stretching from south China to south of Japan 1 week prior to the heatwave, fueling the debate over whether the monsoon activity contributed to this event. Our study found that while the monsoon activity typically has a cooling effect on the PNW's climate, in this particular year, it had a warming effect and thus contributed to this specific heatwave. This unusual warming effect was driven by a stronger and more northward‐shifted Pacific jet stream, which altered the extratropical response to the monsoon, resulting in an anticyclonic pattern over the PNW instead of the typical cyclonic response seen under average climatic conditions. Therefore, it is important to distinguish between the general question of whether monsoon can influence such events on average, and the specific question of whether it did in any specific case. We argue that when discussing the influence of large‐scale climate drivers on extremes, it is crucial to clearly state whether the focus is on the general potential for influence or on the specific role in a particular event.