Euclid preparation

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 683 (2024) ARTN A17

Authors:

K Tanidis, Vf Cardone, M Martinelli, I Tutusaus, S Camera, N Aghanim, A Amara, S Andreon, N Auricchio, M Baldi, S Bardelli, E Branchini, M Brescia, J Brinchmann, V Capobianco, C Carbone, J Carretero, S Casas, M Castellano, S Cavuoti, A Cimatti, R Cledassou, G Congedo, L Conversi, Y Copin, L Corcione, F Courbin, Hm Courtois, A Da Silvay, H Degaudenzi, J Dinis, F Dubath, X Dupac, S Dusini, M Farina, S Farrens, S Ferriol, P Fosalba, M Frailis, E Franceschi, M Fumana, S Galeotta, B Garilli, W Gillard, B Gillis, C Giocoli, A Grazian, F Grupp, L Guzzo, Svh Haugan

Abstract:

Context. The cosmological surveys that are planned for the current decade will provide us with unparalleled observations of the distribution of galaxies on cosmic scales, by means of which we can probe the underlying large-scale structure (LSS) of the Universe. This will allow us to test the concordance cosmological model and its extensions. However, precision pushes us to high levels of accuracy in the theoretical modelling of the LSS observables, so that no biases are introduced into the estimation of the cosmological parameters. In particular, effects such as redshift-space distortions (RSD) can become relevant in the computation of harmonic-space power spectra even for the clustering of the photometrically selected galaxies, as has previously been shown in literature. Aims. In this work, we investigate the contribution of linear RSD, as formulated in the Limber approximation by a previous work, in forecast cosmological analyses with the photometric galaxy sample of the Euclid survey. We aim to assess their impact and to quantify the bias on the measurement of cosmological parameters that would be caused if this effect were neglected. Methods. We performed this task by producing mock power spectra for photometric galaxy clustering and weak lensing, as is expected to be obtained from the Euclid survey. We then used a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach to obtain the posterior distributions of cosmological parameters from these simulated observations. Results. When the linear RSD is neglected, significant biases are caused when galaxy correlations are used alone and when they are combined with cosmic shear in the so-called 3 × 2 pt approach. These biases can be equivalent to as much as 5σ when an underlying ΛCDM cosmology is assumed. When the cosmological model is extended to include the equation-of-state parameters of dark energy, the extension parameters can be shifted by more than 1σ.

syren-halofit: A fast, interpretable, high-precision formula for the $\Lambda$CDM nonlinear matter power spectrum

(2024)

Authors:

Deaglan J Bartlett, Benjamin D Wandelt, Matteo Zennaro, Pedro G Ferreira, Harry Desmond

The IA Guide: A Breakdown of Intrinsic Alignment Formalisms

The Open Journal of Astrophysics Maynooth University 7 (2024)

Authors:

Claire Lamman, Eleni Tsaprazi, Jingjing Shi, Nikolina Niko Šarčević, Susan Pyne, Elisa Legnani, Tassia Ferreira

Modelling cross-correlations of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays and galaxies

The Open Journal of Astrophysics Maynooth University 7 (2024)

Authors:

Federico R Urban, Stefano Camera, David Alonso

Abstract:

The astrophysical engines that power ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) remain to date unknown. Since the propagation horizon of UHECRs is limited to the local, anisotropic Universe, the distribution of UHECR arrival directions should be anisotropic. In this paper we expand the analysis of the potential for the angular, harmonic cross-correlation between UHECRs and galaxies to detect such anisotropies. We do so by studying simulations performed assuming proton, oxygen and silicon injection models, each simulation containing a number of events comparable to a conservative estimate of currently available datasets, as well as by extending the analytic treatment of the magnetic deflections. Quantitatively, we find that, while the correlations for each given multipole are generally weak, (1) the total harmonic power summed over multipoles is detectable with signal-to-noise ratios well above 5 for both the auto-correlation and the cross-correlation (once optimal weights are applied) in most cases studied here, with peaks of signal-to-noise ratio around between 8 and 10 at the highest energies; (2) if we combine the UHECR auto-correlation and the cross-correlation we are able to reach detection levels of 3σ and above for individual multipoles at the largest scales, especially for heavy composition. In particular, we predict that the combined-analysis quadrupole could be detected already with existing data.

The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Measurement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum and Its Implications for Structure Growth

The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 962:2 (2024) 112-112

Authors:

Frank J Qu, Blake D Sherwin, Mathew S Madhavacheril, Dongwon Han, Kevin T Crowley, Irene Abril-Cabezas, Peter AR Ade, Simone Aiola, Tommy Alford, Mandana Amiri, Stefania Amodeo, Rui An, Zachary Atkins, Jason E Austermann, Nicholas Battaglia, Elia Stefano Battistelli, James A Beall, Rachel Bean, Benjamin Beringue, Tanay Bhandarkar, Emily Biermann, Boris Bolliet, J Richard Bond, Hongbo Cai, Erminia Calabrese, William Coulton

Abstract:

Abstract We present new measurements of cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing over 9400 deg2 of the sky. These lensing measurements are derived from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) Data Release 6 (DR6) CMB data set, which consists of five seasons of ACT CMB temperature and polarization observations. We determine the amplitude of the CMB lensing power spectrum at 2.3% precision (43σ significance) using a novel pipeline that minimizes sensitivity to foregrounds and to noise properties. To ensure that our results are robust, we analyze an extensive set of null tests, consistency tests, and systematic error estimates and employ a blinded analysis framework. Our CMB lensing power spectrum measurement provides constraints on the amplitude of cosmic structure that do not depend on Planck or galaxy survey data, thus giving independent information about large-scale structure growth and potential tensions in structure measurements. The baseline spectrum is well fit by a lensing amplitude of A lens = 1.013 ± 0.023 relative to the Planck 2018 CMB power spectra best-fit ΛCDM model and A lens = 1.005 ± 0.023 relative to the ACT DR4 + WMAP best-fit model. From our lensing power spectrum measurement, we derive constraints on the parameter combination S 8 CMBL ≡ σ 8 Ω m / 0.3 0.25 of S 8 CMBL = 0.818 ± 0.022 from ACT DR6 CMB lensing alone and S 8 CMBL = 0.813 ± 0.018 when combining ACT DR6 and Planck NPIPE CMB lensing power spectra. These results are in excellent agreement with ΛCDM model constraints from Planck or ACT DR4 + WMAP CMB power spectrum measurements. Our lensing measurements from redshifts z ∼ 0.5–5 are thus fully consistent with ΛCDM structure growth predictions based on CMB anisotropies probing primarily z ∼ 1100. We find no evidence for a suppression of the amplitude of cosmic structure at low redshifts.