Skip to main content
Home
Department Of Physics text logo
  • Research
    • Our research
    • Our research groups
    • Our research in action
    • Research funding support
    • Summer internships for undergraduates
  • Study
    • Undergraduates
    • Postgraduates
  • Engage
    • For alumni
    • For business
    • For schools
    • For the public
Menu
Juno Jupiter image

Professor Myles Allen CBE FRS

Statutory Professor

Research theme

  • Climate physics

Sub department

  • Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics
Myles.Allen@physics.ox.ac.uk
Telephone: 01865 (2)72085,01865 (2)75895
Atmospheric Physics Clarendon Laboratory, room 109
  • About
  • Publications

Are changes in global precipitation constrained by the tropospheric energy budget?

Journal of Climate 22:3 (2009) 499-517

Authors:

FH Lambert, MR Allen

Abstract:

A tropospheric energy budget argument is used to analyze twentieth-century precipitation changes. It is found that global and ocean-mean general circulation model (GCM) precipitation changes can be understood as being due to the competing direct and surface-temperature-dependent effects of external climate forcings. In agreement with previous work, precipitation is found to respond more strongly to anthropogenic and volcanic sulfate aerosol and solar forcing than to greenhouse gas and black carbon aerosol forcing per unit temperature. This is due to the significant direct effects of greenhouse gas and black carbon forcing. Given that the relative importance of different forcings may change in the twenty-first century, the ratio of global precipitation change to global temperature change may be quite different. Differences in GCM twentieth- and twenty-first-century values are tractable via the energy budget framework in some, but not all, models. Changes in land-mean precipitation, on the other hand, cannot be understood at all with the method used here, even if land-ocean heat transfer is considered. In conclusion, the tropospheric energy budget is a useful concept for understanding the precipitation response to different forcings but it does not fully explain precipitation changes even in the global mean. © 2009 American Meteorological Society.
More details from the publisher
More details

A review of uncertainties in global temperature projections over the twenty-first century

Journal of Climate 21:11 (2008) 2651-2663

Authors:

R Knutti, MR Allen, P Friedlingstein, JM Gregory, GC Hegerl, GA Meehl, M Meinshausen, JM Murphy, GK Plattner, SCB Raper, TF Stocker, PA Stott, H Teng, TML Wigley

Abstract:

Quantification of the uncertainties in future climate projections is crucial for the implementation of climate policies. Here a review of projections of global temperature change over the twenty-first century is provided for the six illustrative emission scenarios from the Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) that assume no policy intervention, based on the latest generation of coupled general circulation models, climate models of intermediate complexity, and simple models, and uncertainty ranges and probabilistic projections from various published methods and models are assessed. Despite substantial improvements in climate models, projections for given scenarios on average have not changed much in recent years. Recent progress has, however, increased the confidence in uncertainty estimates and now allows a better separation of the uncertainties introduced by scenarios, physical feedbacks, carbon cycle, and structural uncertainty. Projection uncertainties are now constrained by observations and therefore consistent with past observed trends and patterns. Future trends in global temperature resulting from anthropogenic forcing over the next few decades are found to be comparably well constrained. Uncertainties for projections on the century time scale, when accounting for structural and feedback uncertainties, are larger than captured in single models or methods. This is due to differences in the models, the sources of uncertainty taken into account, the type of observational constraints used, and the statistical assumptions made. It is shown that as an approximation, the relative uncertainty range for projected warming in 2100 is the same for all scenarios. Inclusion of uncertainties in carbon cycle-climate feedbacks extends the upper bound of the uncertainty range by more than the lower bound. © 2008 American Meteorological Society.
More details from the publisher
More details

Constraints on model response to greenhouse gas forcing and the role of subgrid-scale processes

Journal of Climate 21:11 (2008) 2384-2400

Authors:

BM Sanderson, R Knutti, T Aina, C Christensen, N Faull, DJ Frame, WJ Ingram, C Piani, DA Stainforth, DA Stone, MR Allen

Abstract:

A climate model emulator is developed using neural network techniques and trained with the data from the multithousand-member climateprediction.net perturbed physics GCM ensemble. The method recreates nonlinear interactions between model parameters, allowing a simulation of a much larger ensemble that explores model parameter space more fully. The emulated ensemble is used to search for models closest to observations over a wide range of equilibrium response to greenhouse gas forcing. The relative discrepancies of these models from observations could be used to provide a constraint on climate sensitivity. The use of annual mean or seasonal differences on top-of-atmosphere radiative fluxes as an observational error metric results in the most clearly defined minimum in error as a function of sensitivity, with consistent but less well-defined results when using the seasonal cycles of surface temperature or total precipitation. The model parameter changes necessary to achieve different values of climate sensitivity while minimizing discrepancy from observation are also considered and compared with previous studies. This information is used to propose more efficient parameter sampling strategies for future ensembles. © 2008 American Meteorological Society.
More details from the publisher
More details

Climate change and global risk

Chapter in Global Catastrophic Risks, Oxford University Press (OUP) (2008)

Authors:

David Frame, Myles R Allen
More details from the publisher

Minority report

Nature Geoscience Springer Nature 1:4 (2008) 209-209
More details from the publisher
More details

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Prev
  • …
  • Page 39
  • Page 40
  • Page 41
  • Page 42
  • Current page 43
  • Page 44
  • Page 45
  • Page 46
  • Page 47
  • …
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Footer Menu

  • Contact us
  • Giving to the Dept of Physics
  • Work with us
  • Media

User account menu

  • Log in

Follow us

FIND US

Clarendon Laboratory,

Parks Road,

Oxford,

OX1 3PU

CONTACT US

Tel: +44(0)1865272200

University of Oxfrod logo Department Of Physics text logo
IOP Juno Champion logo Athena Swan Silver Award logo

© University of Oxford - Department of Physics

Cookies | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement

Built by: Versantus

  • Home
  • Research
  • Study
  • Engage
  • Our people
  • News & Comment
  • Events
  • Our facilities & services
  • About us
  • Current students
  • Staff intranet