Quantifying CO2 and Non‐CO2 Contributions to Climate Change Under 1.5°C and 2°C Adaptive Emission Scenarios
Earth's Future American Geophysical Union (AGU) 13:3 (2025)
Geological Net Zero and the need for disaggregated accounting for carbon sinks.
Nature 638:8050 (2025) 343-350
Abstract:
Achieving net-zero global emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), with declining emissions of other greenhouse gases, is widely expected to halt global warming. CO2 emissions will continue to drive warming until fully balanced by active anthropogenic CO2 removals. For practical reasons, however, many greenhouse gas accounting systems allow some 'passive' CO2 uptake, such as enhanced vegetation growth owing to CO2 fertilization, to be included as removals in the definition of net anthropogenic emissions. By including passive CO2 uptake, nominal net-zero emissions would not halt global warming, undermining the Paris Agreement. Here we discuss measures to address this problem, to ensure residual fossil fuel use does not cause further global warming: land management categories should be disaggregated in emissions reporting and targets to better separate the role of passive CO2 uptake; where possible, claimed removals should be additional to passive uptake; and targets should acknowledge the need for Geological Net Zero, meaning one tonne of CO2 permanently restored to the solid Earth for every tonne still generated from fossil sources. We also argue that scientific understanding of Net Zero provides a basis for allocating responsibility for the protection of passive carbon sinks during and after the transition to Geological Net Zero.Towards an operational forecast-based attribution system - beyond isolated events
Copernicus Publications (2025)
AERA-MIP: emission pathways, remaining budgets, and carbon cycle dynamics compatible with 1.5 and 2 °C global warming stabilization
Earth System Dynamics Copernicus Publications 15:6 (2024) 1591-1628
fair-calibrate v1.4.1: calibration, constraining, and validation of the FaIR simple climate model for reliable future climate projections
Geoscientific Model Development Copernicus Publications 17:23 (2024) 8569-8592