Skip to main content
Home
Department Of Physics text logo
  • Research
    • Our research
    • Our research groups
    • Our research in action
    • Research funding support
    • Summer internships for undergraduates
  • Study
    • Undergraduates
    • Postgraduates
  • Engage
    • For alumni
    • For business
    • For schools
    • For the public
Menu
Juno Jupiter image

Professor Roy Grainger

Reader in Atmospheric Physics

Research theme

  • Climate physics

Sub department

  • Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics

Research groups

  • Earth Observation Data Group
Don.Grainger@physics.ox.ac.uk
Telephone: 01865 (2)72888
Robert Hooke Building, room S47
  • About
  • Publications

New insights into the relationship between mass eruption rate and volcanic column height based on the IVESPA data set

Geophysical Research Letters American Geophysical Union 50:14 (2023) e2022GL102633

Authors:

Thomas J Aubry, Samantha L Engwell, Costanza Bonadonna, Larry G Mastin, Guillaume Carazzo, Alexa R Van Eaton, David E Jessop, Roy G Grainger, Simona Scollo, Isabelle A Taylor, A Mark Jellinek, Anja Schmidt, Sebastien Biass, Mathieu Gouhier

Abstract:

Rapid and simple estimation of the mass eruption rate (MER) from column height is essential for real-time volcanic hazard management and reconstruction of past explosive eruptions. Using 134 eruptive events from the new Independent Volcanic Eruption Source Parameter Archive (IVESPA, v1.0), we explore empirical MER-height relationships for four measures of column height: spreading level, sulfur dioxide height, and top height from direct observations and as reconstructed from deposits. These relationships show significant differences and highlight limitations of empirical models currently used in operational and research applications. The roles of atmospheric stratification, wind, and humidity remain challenging to detect across the wide range of eruptive conditions spanned in IVESPA, ultimately resulting in empirical relationships outperforming analytical models that account for atmospheric conditions. This finding highlights challenges in constraining the MER-height relation using heterogeneous observations and empirical models, which reinforces the need for improved eruption source parameter data sets and physics-based models.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details

Uncertainty in aerosol-cloud radiative forcing is driven by clean conditions

Copernicus Publications (2023)

Authors:

Edward Gryspeerdt, Adam C Povey, Roy G Grainger, Otto Hasekamp, N Christina Hsu, Jane P Mulcahy, Andrew M Sayer, Armin Sorooshian
More details from the publisher

Uncertainty in aerosol–cloud radiative forcing is driven by clean conditions

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics European Geosciences Union 23:7 (2023) 4115-4122

Authors:

Edward Gryspeerdt, Adam C Povey, Roy Gordon Grainger

Abstract:

Atmospheric aerosols and their impact on cloud properties remain the largest uncertainty in the human forcing of the climate system. By increasing the concentration of cloud droplets (Nd), aerosols reduce droplet size and increase the reflectivity of clouds (a negative radiative forcing). Central to this climate impact is the susceptibility of cloud droplet number to aerosol (β), the diversity of which explains much of the variation in the radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions (RFaci) in global climate models. This has made measuring β a key target for developing observational constraints of the aerosol forcing.

While the aerosol burden of the clean, pre-industrial atmosphere has been demonstrated as a key uncertainty for the aerosol forcing, here we show that the behaviour of clouds under these clean conditions is of equal importance for understanding the spread in radiative forcing estimates between models and observations. This means that the uncertainty in the aerosol impact on clouds is, counterintuitively, driven by situations with little aerosol. Discarding clean conditions produces a close agreement between different model and observational estimates of the cloud response to aerosol but does not provide a strong constraint on the RFaci. This makes constraining aerosol behaviour in clean conditions an important goal for future observational studies.

More details from the publisher
Details from ORA

Uncertainty in aerosol-cloud radiative forcing is driven by clean conditions

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics European Geosciences Union (2023)

Authors:

Edward Gryspeerdt, Adam Povey, Roy Grainger, Otto Hasekamp, Christina Hsu, Jane Mulcahy, Andrew Sayer, Armin Sorooshian
More details from the publisher
More details

Tonga eruption increases chance of temporary surface temperature anomaly above 1.5 °C

Nature Climate Change Springer Nature 13 (2023) 127-129

Authors:

Stuart Jenkins, Chris Smith, Myles Allen, Roy Grainger

Abstract:

On 15 January 2022, the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai (HTHH) eruption injected 146 MtH2O and 0.42 MtSO2 into the stratosphere. This large water vapour perturbation means that HTHH will probably increase the net radiative forcing, unusual for a large volcanic eruption, increasing the chance of the global surface temperature anomaly temporarily exceeding 1.5 °C over the coming decade. Here we estimate the radiative response to the HTHH eruption and derive the increased risk that the global mean surface temperature anomaly shortly exceeds 1.5 °C following the eruption. We show that HTHH has a tangible impact of the chance of imminent 1.5 °C exceedance (increasing the chance of at least one of the next 5 years exceeding 1.5 °C by 7%), but the level of climate policy ambition, particularly the mitigation of short-lived climate pollutants, dominates the 1.5 °C exceedance outlook over decadal timescales.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Prev
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Current page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • …
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Footer Menu

  • Contact us
  • Giving to the Dept of Physics
  • Work with us
  • Media

User account menu

  • Log in

Follow us

FIND US

Clarendon Laboratory,

Parks Road,

Oxford,

OX1 3PU

CONTACT US

Tel: +44(0)1865272200

University of Oxfrod logo Department Of Physics text logo
IOP Juno Champion logo Athena Swan Silver Award logo

© University of Oxford - Department of Physics

Cookies | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement

Built by: Versantus

  • Home
  • Research
  • Study
  • Engage
  • Our people
  • News & Comment
  • Events
  • Our facilities & services
  • About us
  • Current students
  • Staff intranet