Skip to main content
Home
Department Of Physics text logo
  • Research
    • Our research
    • Our research groups
    • Our research in action
    • Research funding support
    • Summer internships for undergraduates
  • Study
    • Undergraduates
    • Postgraduates
  • Engage
    • For alumni
    • For business
    • For schools
    • For the public
  • Support
Menu
von Kármán vortex street over Canary Islands
Credit: NASA

Philip Stier

Professor of Atmospheric Physics

Research theme

  • Climate physics

Sub department

  • Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics

Research groups

  • Climate processes
philip.stier@physics.ox.ac.uk
Telephone: 01865 (2)72887
Atmospheric Physics Clarendon Laboratory, room 103
  • About
  • Research
  • Teaching
  • CV
  • Publications

Anthropogenic aerosols modulated 20th-century Sahel rainfall variability via their impacts on North Atlantic sea surface temperature

Geophysical Research Letters Wiley 49:1 (2021) e2021GL095629

Authors:

Shipeng Zhang, Philip Stier, Guy Dagan, Minghuai Wang

Abstract:

The Sahel rainfall has a close teleconnection with North Atlantic sea surface temperature (NASST) variability, which has separately been shown to be affected by aerosols. Therefore, changes in regional aerosols emission could potentially drive multidecadal Sahel rainfall variability. Here we combine ensembles of state-of-the-art global climate models (the CESM and CanESM large ensemble simulations and CMIP6 models) with observational data sets to demonstrate that anthropogenic aerosols have significantly impacted 20th-century detrended Sahel rainfall multidecadal variability through modifying NASST. We show that aerosol-induced multidecadal variations of downward solar radiative fluxes over the North Atlantic cause NASST variability during the 20th century, altering the ITCZ position and dynamically linking aerosol effects to Sahel rainfall variability. This process chain is caused by aerosol-induced changes in radiative surface fluxes rather than changes in ocean circulations. CMIP6 models further suggest that aerosol-cloud interactions modulate the inter-model uncertainty of simulated NASST and potentially the Sahel rainfall variability.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details
More details

Model calibration using ESEm v1.1.0 – an open, scalable Earth System Emulator

Geoscientific Model Development Copernicus Publications (2021)

Authors:

Duncan WATSON-PARRIS, Andrew Williams, Lucia Deaconu, PHILIP STIER
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details
Details from ArXiV

Model calibration using ESEm v1.1.0 – an open, scalable Earth system emulator

Geoscientific Model Development Copernicus GmbH 14:12 (2021) 7659-7672

Authors:

Duncan Watson-Parris, Andrew Williams, Lucia Deaconu, Philip Stier

Abstract:

<jats:p>Abstract. Large computer models are ubiquitous in the Earth sciences. These models often have tens or hundreds of tuneable parameters and can take thousands of core hours to run to completion while generating terabytes of output. It is becoming common practice to develop emulators as fast approximations, or surrogates, of these models in order to explore the relationships between these inputs and outputs, understand uncertainties, and generate large ensembles datasets. While the purpose of these surrogates may differ, their development is often very similar. Here we introduce ESEm: an open-source tool providing a general workflow for emulating and validating a wide variety of models and outputs. It includes efficient routines for sampling these emulators for the purpose of uncertainty quantification and model calibration. It is built on well-established, high-performance libraries to ensure robustness, extensibility and scalability. We demonstrate the flexibility of ESEm through three case studies using ESEm to reduce parametric uncertainty in a general circulation model and explore precipitation sensitivity in a cloud-resolving model and scenario uncertainty in the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble. </jats:p>
More details from the publisher

Using Non-Linear Causal Models to Study Aerosol-Cloud Interactions in the Southeast Pacific

(2021)

Authors:

Andrew Jesson, Peter Manshausen, Alyson Douglas, Duncan Watson-Parris, Yarin Gal, Philip Stier
More details from the publisher

Aerosol absorption in global models from AeroCom phase III

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics European Geosciences Union 21:20 (2021) 15929-15947

Authors:

Maria Sand, Bjorn H Samset, Gunnar Myhre, Jonas Gliss, Susanne E Bauer, Huisheng Bian, Mian Chin, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Paul Ginoux, Zak Kipling, Alf Kirkevag, Harri Kokkola, Philippe Le Sager, Marianne T Lund, Hitoshi Matsui, Twan van Noije, Dirk JL Olivie, Samuel Remy, Michael Schulz, Philip Stier, Camilla W Stjern, Toshihiko Takemura, Kostas Tsigaridis, Svetlana G Tsyro, Duncan Watson-Parris

Abstract:

Aerosol-induced absorption of shortwave radiation can modify the climate through local atmospheric heating, which affects lapse rates, precipitation, and cloud formation. Presently, the total amount of aerosol absorption is poorly constrained, and the main absorbing aerosol species (black carbon (BC), organic aerosols (OA), and mineral dust) are diversely quantified in global climate models. As part of the third phase of the Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) intercomparison initiative (AeroCom phase III), we here document the distribution and magnitude of aerosol absorption in current global aerosol models and quantify the sources of intermodel spread, highlighting the difficulties of attributing absorption to different species. In total, 15 models have provided total present-day absorption at 550 nm (using year 2010 emissions), 11 of which have provided absorption per absorbing species. The multi-model global annual mean total absorption aerosol optical depth (AAOD) is 0.0054 (0.0020 to 0.0098; 550 nm), with the range given as the minimum and maximum model values. This is 28 % higher compared to the 0.0042 (0.0021 to 0.0076) multi-model mean in AeroCom phase II (using year 2000 emissions), but the difference is within 1 standard deviation, which, in this study, is 0.0023 (0.0019 in Phase II). Of the summed component AAOD, 60 % (range 36 %–84 %) is estimated to be due to BC, 31 % (12 %–49 %) is due to dust, and 11 % (0 %–24 %) is due to OA; however, the components are not independent in terms of their absorbing efficiency. In models with internal mixtures of absorbing aerosols, a major challenge is the lack of a common and simple method to attribute absorption to the different absorbing species. Therefore, when possible, the models with internally mixed aerosols in the present study have performed simulations using the same method for estimating absorption due to BC, OA, and dust, namely by removing it and comparing runs with and without the absorbing species. We discuss the challenges of attributing absorption to different species; we compare burden, refractive indices, and density; and we contrast models with internal mixing to models with external mixing. The model mean BC mass absorption coefficient (MAC) value is 10.1 (3.1 to 17.7) m2 g−1 (550 nm), and the model mean BC AAOD is 0.0030 (0.0007 to 0.0077). The difference in lifetime (and burden) in the models explains as much of the BC AAOD spread as the difference in BC MAC values. The difference in the spectral dependency between the models is striking. Several models have an absorption Ångstrøm exponent (AAE) close to 1, which likely is too low given current knowledge of spectral aerosol optical properties. Most models do not account for brown carbon and underestimate the spectral dependency for OA.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Prev
  • …
  • Page 23
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • Page 26
  • Current page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Page 31
  • …
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Footer Menu

  • Contact us
  • Giving to the Dept of Physics
  • Work with us
  • Media

User account menu

  • Log in

Follow us

FIND US

Clarendon Laboratory,

Parks Road,

Oxford,

OX1 3PU

CONTACT US

Tel: +44(0)1865272200

University of Oxfrod logo Department Of Physics text logo
IOP Juno Champion logo Athena Swan Silver Award logo

© University of Oxford - Department of Physics

Cookies | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement

Built by: Versantus

  • Home
  • Research
  • Study
  • Engage
  • Our people
  • News & Comment
  • Events
  • Our facilities & services
  • About us
  • Giving to Physics
  • Current students
  • Staff intranet