Kristian Strommen

Abstract:

This study evaluates the performance of high-resolution (grid sizes of 9-28 km for the atmosphere; 5-13 km for the ocean) global simulations from the EERIE project in representing the persistence of the Southern Annular Mode (SAM), a leading mode of Southern Hemisphere climate variability. Using the decorrelation timescale of the SAM index (τ), we compare EERIE simulations with CMIP6 models and ERA5 reanalysis. EERIE simulations reduce long-standing biases in SAM persistence, especially in early summer, with τ values of 9-20 d compared to CMIP6's 9-32 d and ERA5's 11 d. This improvement correlates with a more accurate climatological jet latitude (λ0). EERIE atmosphere-only AMIP runs outperform the coupled simulations in both τ and λ0, showing smaller biases and ranges of variability, underscoring the critical role of sea surface temperature (SST) representation in shaping atmospheric circulation. In these AMIP experiments, the atmospheric eddy feedback strength, combined with the damping timescale estimated via friction, correlates more strongly with τ than λ0. We speculate that the well-captured jet position (biases < 1° relative to ERA5), due to prescribed SSTs, limits λ0's explanatory power for τ differences, allowing other processes to dominate. Using a finer model grid (9 km vs. 28 km) of the same AMIP model reduces τ, though the mechanism remains unclear. Finally, motivated by the importance of oceanic eddies in the Southern Ocean, we conducted sensitivity experiments that filter transient mesoscale features from the SST boundary conditions. The results suggest that oceanic eddies may enhance summertime SAM persistence (by g1/4 2 d), though this signal is not statistically significant and is absent in the single 9 km run, pointing to a subtle role of mesoscale ocean-Atmosphere interaction that remains to be explored.

Abstract:

Weather regimes and weather patterns, here jointly referred to as circulation types, are used to generate forecasts for a variety of applications, such as energy demand and flood risk. However, there are usually many different choices available for precisely which circulation types to use. Ideally, one would like to use circulation types that are both highly informative for the application and also highly predictable, but in practice, there is often a tradeoff between informativity and predictability. We present a simple, general framework for how to construct a circulation type forecast that optimally balances these factors by segueing between different choices of circulation types at different lead times based on information‐theoretic considerations. As an example, we apply this framework to the case of forecasting energy demand in Great British winters. We compare a set of 30 weather patterns produced by the UK Met Office with the much simpler two‐state framework consisting of a positive and negative North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) regime and show how to optimally combine the two across a winter season.

Abstract:

Past studies show that coupled model biases in European blocking and North Atlantic eddy-driven jet variability decrease as one increases the horizontal resolution in the atmospheric and oceanic model components, but it remains unclear if atmospheric or oceanic resolution plays a greater role and why. Here, following recent work by Schemm et al., we leverage a large multimodel ensemble to show that a coupled model’s ability to simulate extreme Gulf Stream precipitation is tightly linked to its simulated frequency of European blocking and northern jet excursions. Furthermore, the reduced biases in blocking and jet variability are consistent with better resolved precipitation extrema in high-resolution models. The analysis supports a hypothesis that models which simulate more extreme precipitation can generate more strongly poleward-propagating cyclones and more intense anticyclonic anomalies due to the stronger latent heat release occurring during extreme events. By contrast, typical North Atlantic SST biases are found to share only a weak or negligible relationship with blocking and jet biases. Finally, while previous studies have used a comparison between coupled models and models run with prescribed SSTs to argue for the role of ocean resolution, we emphasize here that models run with prescribed SSTs experience greatly reduced precipitation extremes due to their excessive thermal damping, making it unclear if such a comparison is meaningful. Instead, we speculate that most of the reduction in coupled model biases may actually be due to increased atmospheric resolution leading to better resolved convection.