SNITCH: seeking a simple, informative star formation history inference tool

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 484:3 (2019) 3590-3603

Authors:

Rebecca J Smethurst, M Merrifield, Christopher Lintott, KL Masters, BD Simmons, A Fraser-Mckelvie, T Peterken, M Boquien, RA Riffel, N Drory

Abstract:

Deriving a simple, analytic galaxy star formation history (SFH) using observational data is a complex task without the proper tool to hand. We therefore present SNITCH, an open source code written in PYTHON, developed to quickly (2 min) infer the parameters describing an analytic SFH model from the emission and absorption features of a galaxy spectrum dominated by star formation gas ionization. SNITCH uses the Flexible Stellar Population Synthesis models of Conroy, Gunn & White (2009), the MaNGA Data Analysis Pipeline and a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method in order to infer three parameters (time of quenching, rate of quenching, and model metallicity) which best describe an exponentially declining quenching history. This code was written for use on the MaNGA spectral data cubes but is customizable by a user so that it can be used for any scenario where a galaxy spectrum has been obtained, and adapted to infer a user defined analytic SFH model for specific science cases. Herein, we outline the rigorous testing applied to SNITCH and show that it is both accurate and precise at deriving the SFH of a galaxy spectra. The tests suggest that SNITCHis sensitive to the most recent epoch of star formation but can also trace the quenching of star formation even if the true decline does not occur at an exponential rate. With the use of both an analytical SFH and only five spectral features, we advocate that this code be used as a comparative tool across a large population of spectra, either for integral field unit data cubes or across a population of galaxy spectra.

Uncorrelated velocity and size residuals across galaxy rotation curves

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) (2019)

Authors:

Harry Desmond, Harley Katz, Federico Lelli, Stacy McGaugh

Probing Cosmic Dawn with Emission Lines: Predicting Infrared and Nebular Line Emission for ALMA and JWST

(2019)

Authors:

Harley Katz, Thomas P Galligan, Taysun Kimm, Joakim Rosdahl, Martin G Haehnelt, Jeremy Blaizot, Julien Devriendt, Adrianne Slyz, Nicolas Laporte, Richard Ellis

deepCool: Fast and Accurate Estimation of Cooling Rates in Irradiated Gas with Artificial Neural Networks

(2019)

Authors:

Thomas P Galligan, Harley Katz, Taysun Kimm, Joakim Rosdahl, Jeremy Blaizot, Julien Devriendt, Adrianne Slyz

A unified analysis of four cosmic shear surveys

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY 482:3 (2019) 3696-3717

Authors:

Chihway Chang, Michael Wang, Scott Dodelson, Tim Eifler, Catherine Heymans, Michael Jarvis, M James Jee, Shahab Joudaki, Elisabeth Krause, Alex Malz, Rachel Mandelbaum, Irshad Mohammed, Michael Schneider, Melanie Simet, Michael A Troxel, Joe Zuntz, LSST Dark Energy Sci Collaboration

Abstract:

© 2018 The Author(s). In the past few years, several independent collaborations have presented cosmological constraints from tomographic cosmic shear analyses. These analyses differ in many aspects: the data sets, the shear and photometric redshift estimation algorithms, the theory model assumptions, and the inference pipelines. To assess the robustness of the existing cosmic shear results, we present in this paper a unified analysis of four of the recent cosmic shear surveys: the Deep Lens Survey (DLS), the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS), the Science Verification data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES-SV), and the 450 deg2 release of the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-450). By using a unified pipeline, we show how the cosmological constraints are sensitive to the various details of the pipeline. We identify several analysis choices that can shift the cosmological constraints by a significant fraction of the uncertainties. For our fiducial analysis choice, considering a Gaussian covariance, conservative scale cuts, assuming no baryonic feedback contamination, identical cosmological parameter priors and intrinsic alignment treatments, we find the constraints (mean, 16 per cent and 84 per cent confidence intervals) on the parameter S8 = σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5 to be S8 = 0.942-0.045 (DLS), 0.657-0.070+0.071 (CFHTLenS), 0.844 -0.061+0.062(DES-+0.046SV), and 0.755-0.049+0.048 (KiDS-450). From the goodness-of-fit and the Bayesian evidence ratio, we determine that amongst the four surveys, the two more recent surveys, DES-SV and KiDS-450, have acceptable goodness of fit and are consistent with each other. The combined constraints are S8 = 0.790-0.041+0.042, which is in good agreement with the first year of DES cosmic shear results and recent CMB constraints from the Planck satellite.