Robustness of inflation to inhomogeneous initial conditions

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2017:09 (2017) 025-025

Authors:

Katy Clough, Eugene A Lim, Brandon S DiNunno, Willy Fischler, Raphael Flauger, Sonia Paban

The limited role of galaxy mergers in driving stellar mass growth over cosmic time

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters Oxford University Press 472:1 (2017) L50-L54

Authors:

G Martin, S Kaviraj, Julien EG Devriendt, Y Dubois, Clotilde MC Laigle, C Pichon

Abstract:

A key unresolved question is the role that galaxy mergers play in driving stellar mass growth over cosmic time. Recent observational work hints at the possibility that the overall contribution of `major' mergers (mass ratios $\gtrsim$1:4) to cosmic stellar mass growth may be small, because they enhance star formation rates by relatively small amounts at high redshift, when much of today's stellar mass was assembled. However, the heterogeneity and relatively small size of today's datasets, coupled with the difficulty in identifying genuine mergers, makes it challenging to $\textit{empirically}$ quantify the merger contribution to stellar mass growth. Here, we use Horizon-AGN, a cosmological hydrodynamical simulation, to comprehensively quantify the contribution of mergers to the star formation budget over the lifetime of the Universe. We show that: (1) both major and minor mergers enhance star formation to similar amounts, (2) the fraction of star formation directly attributable to merging is small at all redshifts (e.g. $\sim$35 and $\sim$20 per cent at z$\sim$3 and z$\sim$1 respectively) and (3) only $\sim$25 per cent of today's stellar mass is directly attributable to galaxy mergers over cosmic time. Our results suggest that smooth accretion, not merging, is the dominant driver of stellar mass growth over the lifetime of the Universe.

Cosmology of an infinite dimensional universe

PHYSICAL REVIEW D 96:4 (2017) ARTN 043527

Authors:

D Sloan, PG Ferreira

The limited role of galaxy mergers in driving stellar mass growth over cosmic time

(2017)

Authors:

G Martin, S Kaviraj, JEG Devriendt, Y Dubois, C Laigle, C Pichon

Galaxy Zoo and SpArcFiRe: Constraints on spiral arm formation mechanisms from spiral arm number and pitch angles

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 472:2 (2017) 2263-2279

Authors:

RE Hart, SP Bamford, WB Hayes, CN Cardamone, WC Keel, Sandor J Kruk, Christopher Lintott, KL Masters, BD Simmons, RJ Smethurst

Abstract:

In this paper we study the morphological properties of spiral galaxies, including measurements of spiral arm number and pitch angle. Using Galaxy Zoo 2, a stellar mass-complete sample of 6,222 SDSS spiral galaxies is selected. We use the machine vision algorithm SpArcFiRe to identify spiral arm features and measure their associated geometries. A support vector machine classifier is employed to identify reliable spiral features, with which we are able to estimate pitch angles for half of our sample. We use these machine measurements to calibrate visual estimates of arm tightness, and hence estimate pitch angles for our entire sample. The properties of spiral arms are compared with respect to various galaxy properties. The star formation properties of galaxies vary significantly with arm number, but not pitch angle. We find that galaxies hosting strong bars have spiral arms substantially (4-6) looser than unbarred galaxies. Accounting for this, spiral arms associated with many-arm structures are looser (by 2) than those in two-arm galaxies. In contrast to this average trend, galaxies with greater bulge-to-total stellar mass ratios display both fewer and looser spiral arms. This effect is primarily driven by the galaxy disc, such that galaxies with more massive discs contain more spiral arms with tighter pitch angles. This implies that galaxy central mass concentration is not the dominant cause of pitch angle and arm number variations between galaxies, which in turn suggests that not all spiral arms are governed by classical density waves or modal theories.