The scatter in the galaxy-halo connection: a machine learning analysis

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY 514:3 (2022) 4026-4045

Authors:

Richard Stiskalek, Deaglan J Bartlett, Harry Desmond, Dhayaa Anbajagane

First light for GRAVITY Wide

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 665 (2022) A75-A75

Authors:

R Abuter, F Allouche, A Amorim, C Bailet, M Bauböck, J-P Berger, P Berio, A Bigioli, O Boebion, ML Bolzer, H Bonnet, G Bourdarot, P Bourget, W Brandner, Y Clénet, B Courtney-Barrer, Y Dallilar, R Davies, D Defrère, A Delboulbé, F Delplancke, R Dembet, PT de Zeeuw, A Drescher, A Eckart

Abstract:

More than a century ago, Albert Einstein presented his general theory of gravitation (GR) to the Prussian Academy of Sciences. One of the predictions of the theory is that not only particles and objects with mass, but also the quanta of light, photons, are tied to the curvature of space-time, and thus to gravity. There must be a critical compactness, above which photons cannot escape. These are black holes (henceforth BH). It took fifty years after the theory was announced before possible candidate objects were identified by observational astronomy. And another fifty years have passed, until we finally have in hand detailed and credible experimental evidence that BHs of 10 to 10^10 times the mass of the Sun exist in the Universe. Three very different experimental techniques, but all based on Michelson interferometry or Fourier-inversion spatial interferometry have enabled the critical experimental breakthroughs. It has now become possible to investigate the space-time structure in the vicinity of the event horizons of BHs. We briefly summarize these interferometric techniques, and discuss the spectacular recent improvements achieved with all three techniques. Finally, we sketch where the path of exploration and inquiry may go on in the next decades.Comment: 50 pages, accepted to The Astronomy and Astrophysics Revie

Strong C IV emission from star-forming galaxies: a case for high Lyman continuum photon escape

ArXiv 2206.06161 (2022)

Authors:

A Saxena, E Cryer, RS Ellis, L Pentericci, A Calabrò, S Mascia, A Saldana-Lopez, D Schaerer, H Katz, M Llerena, R Amorín

A challenge to the standard cosmological model

Astrophysical Journal Letters (2022)

Authors:

Nathan Secrest, Sebastian VON HAUSEGGER, Mohamed Rameez, Roya Mohayaee, Subir Sarkar

Effects of boosting on extragalactic components: methods and statistical studies

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 513:2 (2022) 2252-2270

Authors:

W Coulton, S Feldman, K Maamari, E Pierpaoli, S Yasini, K Dolag

Abstract:

In this work, we examine the impact of our motion with respect to the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) rest frame on statistics of CMB maps by examining the one-, two-, three-, and four- point statistics of simulated maps of the CMB and Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effects. We validate boosting codes by comparing their outcomes for temperature and polarization power spectra up to ℓ ∼ 6000. We derive and validate a new analytical formula for the computation of the boosted power spectrum of a signal with a generic frequency dependence. As an example we show how this increases the boosting correction to the power spectrum of CMB intensity measurements by ∼30 per cent at 150 GHz. We examine the effect of boosting on thermal and kinetic SZ power spectra from semianalytical and hydrodynamical simulations; the boosting correction is generally small for both simulations, except when considering frequencies near the tSZ null. For the non-Gaussian statistics, in general we find that boosting has no impact with two exceptions. We find that, whilst the statistics of the CMB convergence field are unaffected, quadratic estimators that are used to measure this field can become biased at the O(1)per cent level by boosting effects. We present a simple modification to the standard estimators that removes this bias. Second, bispectrum estimators can receive a systematic bias from the Doppler induced quadrupole when there is anisotropy in the sky - in practice this anisotropy comes from masking and inhomogeneous noise. This effect is unobservable and already removed by existing analysis methods.