First Insights into the ISM at $z>8$ with JWST: Possible Physical Implications of a High [O III]$\mathbf{\lambda 4363}$/[O III]$\mathbf{\lambda 5007}$

(2022)

Authors:

Harley Katz, Aayush Saxena, Alex J Cameron, Stefano Carniani, Andrew J Bunker, Santiago Arribas, Rachana Bhatawdekar, Rebecca AA Bowler, Kristan NK Boyett, Giovanni Cresci, Emma Curtis-Lake, Francesco D'Eugenio, Nimisha Kumari, Tobias J Looser, Roberto Maiolino, Hannah Ubler, Chris Willott, Joris Witstok

The curious case of the "Heartworm" Nebula

Astrophysical Journal IOP Publishing 934:1 (2022) 78

Authors:

WD Cotton, F Camilo, W Becker, JJ Condon, J Forbrich, Ian Heywood, B Hugo, S Legodi, T Mauch, P Predehl, P Slane, MA Thompson

Abstract:

The curious Galactic features near G357.2−0.2 were observed with the MeerKAT radio interferometer array in the UHF and L bands (0.56–1.68 GHz). There are two possibly related features: a newly identified faint heart-shaped partial shell (the "heart"), and a series of previously known but now much better imaged narrow, curved features (the "worm") interior to the heart. Polarized emission suggests that much of the emission is nonthermal and is embedded in a dense plasma. The filaments of the worm appear to be magnetic structures powered by embedded knots that are sites of particle acceleration. The morphology of the worm broadly resembles some known pulsar wind nebulae (PWNe) but there is no known pulsar or PWN which could be powering this structure. We also present eROSITA observations of the field; no part of the nebula is detected in X-rays, but the current limits do not preclude the existence of a pulsar/PWN of intermediate spin-down luminosity.

MIGHTEE: the nature of the radio-loud AGN population

ArXiv 2207.12379 (2022)

Authors:

IH Whittam, MJ Jarvis, CL Hale, M Prescott, LK Morabito, I Heywood, NJ Adams, J Afonso, Fangxia An, Y Ao, RA Bowler, JD Collier, RP Deane, J Delhaize, B Frank, M Glowacki, PW Hatfield, N Maddox, L Marchetti, AM Matthews, I Prandoni, S Randriamampandry, Z Randriamanakoto, DJB Smith, AR Taylor, NL Thomas, M Vaccari

The chemical enrichment in the early Universe as probed by JWST via direct metallicity measurements at z~8

(2022)

Authors:

M Curti, F D'Eugenio, S Carniani, R Maiolino, L Sandles, J Witstok, WM Baker, JS Bennett, JM Piotrowska, S Tacchella, S Charlot, K Nakajima, G Maheson, F Mannucci, A Amiri, S Arribas, F Belfiore, NR Bonaventura, AJ Bunker, J Chevallard, G Cresci, E Curtis-Lake, C Hayden-Pawson, N Kumari, I Laseter, TJ Looser, A Marconi, MV Maseda, GC Jones, J Scholtz, R Smit, H Ubler, IEB Wallace

Astrophysical gravitational-wave echoes from galactic nuclei

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 515:3 (2022) 3299-3318

Authors:

László Gondán, Bence Kocsis

Abstract:

Galactic nuclei (GNs) are dense stellar environments abundant in gravitational-wave (GW) sources for the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), Virgo, and Kamioka Gravitational Wave Detector (KAGRA). The GWs may be generated by stellar-mass black hole (BH) or neutron star mergers following gravitational bremsstrahlung, dynamical scattering encounters, Kozai–Lidov-type oscillations driven by the central supermassive black hole (SMBH), or gas-assisted mergers if present. In this paper, we examine a smoking gun signature to identify sources in GNs: the GWs scattered by the central SMBH. This produces a secondary signal, an astrophysical GW echo, which has a very similar time–frequency evolution as the primary signal but arrives after a time delay. We determine the amplitude and time-delay distribution of the GW echo as a function of source distance from the SMBH. Between ∼10 per cent and 90 per cent of the detectable echoes arrive within ∼(1--100)M6s after the primary GW for sources between 10 and 104 Schwarzschild radius, where M6=MSMBH,z/ (106M), and MSMBH, z is the observer-frame SMBH mass. The echo arrival times are systematically longer for high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) primary GWs, where the GW echo rays are scattered at large deflection angles. In particular, ∼10 per cent--90 per cent of the distribution is shifted to ∼(5--1800)M6s for sources, where the lower limit of echo detection is 0.02 of the primary signal amplitude. We find that ∼5 per cent--30 per cent(⁠∼1 per cent--7 per cent⁠) of GW sources have an echo amplitude larger than 0.2–0.05 times the amplitude of the primary signal if the source distance from the SMBH is 50 (200) Schwarzschild radius. Non-detections can rule out that a GW source is near an SMBH.