The Science Performance of JWST as Characterized in Commissioning

Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific IOP Publishing 135:1046 (2023) 048001-048001

Authors:

Jane Rigby, Marshall Perrin, Michael McElwain, Randy Kimble, Scott Friedman, Matt Lallo, René Doyon, Lee Feinberg, Pierre Ferruit, Alistair Glasse, Marcia Rieke, George Rieke, Gillian Wright, Chris Willott, Knicole Colon, Stefanie Milam, Susan Neff, Christopher Stark, Jeff Valenti, Jim Abell, Faith Abney, Yasin Abul-Huda, D Scott Acton, Evan Adams, David Adler

Abstract:

We summarize JWST's measured telescope performance across science Cycle 1. The stability of segments alignments is typically better than 10 nanometers RMS between measurements every two days, leading to highly stable point spread functions. The frequency of segment "tilt events" decreased significantly, and larger tilt events ceased entirely, as structures gradually equilibrated after cooldown. Mirror corrections every 1-2 months now maintain the telescope below 70 nm RMS wavefront error. Observed micrometeoroid impacts during cycle 1 had negligible effect on science performance, consistent with preflight predictions. As JWST begins Cycle 2, its optical performance and stability are equal to, and in some ways better than, the performance reported at the end of commissioning.Comment: STScI Technical Memo. 2.5 pages text, 1 figur

Erratum: Molecular Gas Properties on Cloud Scales across the Local Star-forming Galaxy Population (ApJL (2020)901 (L8) DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/abb3be)

Astrophysical Journal Letters 946:2 (2023)

Authors:

J Sun, AK Leroy, E Schinnerer, A Hughes, E Rosolowsky, M Querejeta, A Schruba, D Liu, T Saito, CN Herrera, C Faesi, A Usero, J Pety, JMD Kruijssen, EC Ostriker, F Bigiel, GA Blanc, AD Bolatto, M Boquien, M Chevance, DA Dale, S Deger, E Emsellem, SCO Glover, K Grasha, B Groves, J Henshaw, MJ Jimenez-Donaire, JJ Kim, RS Klessen, K Kreckel, JC Lee, S Meidt, K Sandstrom, AE Sardone, D Utomo, TG Williams

Abstract:

In the published article, the prefactor in Equation (3) was incorrectly written as 3.3 × 104 as opposed to 3.3 × 105. The correct equation should be. This was a typo and did not propagate into or affect any quantitative results of the paper.

Bright extragalactic ALMA redshift survey (BEARS) III: detailed study of emission lines from 71 Herschel targets

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) 521:4 (2023) 5508-5535

Authors:

M Hagimoto, TJLC Bakx, S Serjeant, GJ Bendo, SA Urquhart, S Eales, KC Harrington, Y Tamura, H Umehata, S Berta, AR Cooray, P Cox, G De Zotti, MD Lehnert, DA Riechers, D Scott, P Temi, PP van der Werf, C Yang, A Amvrosiadis, PM Andreani, AJ Baker, A Beelen, E Borsato, V Buat, KM Butler, H Dannerbauer, L Dunne, S Dye, AFM Enia, L Fan, R Gavazzi, J González-Nuevo, AI Harris, CN Herrera, DH Hughes, D Ismail, RJ Ivison, B Jones, K Kohno, M Krips, G Lagache, L Marchetti, M Massardi, H Messias, M Negrello, R Neri, A Omont, I Perez-Fournon, C Sedgwick, MWL Smith, F Stanley, A Verma, C Vlahakis, B Ward, C Weiner, A Weiß, AJ Young

Supermassive black hole mass in the massive elliptical galaxy M87 from integral-field stellar dynamics using OASIS and MUSE with adaptive optics: assessing systematic uncertainties

(2023)

Authors:

David A Simon, Michele Cappellari, Johanna Hartke

MaNGA integral-field stellar kinematics of LoTSS radio galaxies: Luminous radio galaxies tend to be slow rotators

(2023)

Authors:

Xuechen Zheng, Huub Röttgering, Arjen van der Wel, Michele Cappellari