Planet formation and dynamics

Abstract:

Over the last decade, the vector-apodizing phase plate (vAPP) coronagraph has been developed from concept to on-sky application in many high-contrast imaging systems on 8 m class telescopes. The vAPP is a geometric-phase patterned coronagraph that is inherently broadband, and its manufacturing is enabled only by direct-write technology for liquid-crystal patterns. The vAPP generates two coronagraphic point spread functions (PSFs) that cancel starlight on opposite sides of the PSF and have opposite circular polarization states. The efficiency, that is, the amount of light in these PSFs, depends on the retardance offset from a half-wave of the liquid-crystal retarder. Using different liquid-crystal recipes to tune the retardance, different vAPPs operate with high efficiencies (${\gt}96\%$) in the visible and thermal infrared (0.55 µm to 5 µm). Since 2015, seven vAPPs have been installed in a total of six different instruments, including Magellan/MagAO, Magellan/MagAO-X, Subaru/SCExAO, and LBT/LMIRcam. Using two integral field spectrographs installed on the latter two instruments, these vAPPs can provide low-resolution spectra (${\rm{R}} \sim 30$) between 1 µm and 5 µm. We review the design process, development, commissioning, on-sky performance, and first scientific results of all commissioned vAPPs. We report on the lessons learned and conclude with perspectives for future developments and applications.

Abstract:

The tidal evolution of interacting binaries when the orbital period is short compared to the primary star's convective time scale is a problem of long-standing. Terquem (2021) has argued that, when this temporal ordering scheme is obeyed, the rate of energy transfer from tides to convection (denoted $D_R$) is given by the product of the averaged Reynolds stress associated with the tidal velocity and the mean shear associated with the convective flow. In a recent response, Barker and Astoul (2021, hereafter BA21) claim to show that $D_R$ (in this form) cannot contribute to tidal dissipation. Their analysis is based on a study of Boussinesq and anelastic models. Here, we demonstrate that BA21 misidentify the correct term responsible for energy transfer between tides and convection. As a consequence, their anelastic calculations do not prove that the $D_R$ formulation is invalidated as an energy-loss coupling between tides and convection. BA21 also carry out a calculation in the Boussinesq approximation. Here, their claim that $D_R$ once again does not contribute is based on boundary conditions that do not apply to any star or planet that radiates energy from its surface, which is a key dissipational process in the problem we consider.