Multifrequency study of the peculiar pulsars PSR B0919+06 and PSR B1859+07

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) 506:4 (2021) 5836-5847

Authors:

KM Rajwade, BBP Perera, BW Stappers, J Roy, A Karastergiou, JM Rankin

Signatures of hierarchical mergers in black hole spin and mass distribution

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 507:3 (2021) 3362-3380

Authors:

Hiromichi Tagawa, Zoltan Haiman, Imre Bartos, Bence Kocsis, Kazuyuki Omukai

Abstract:

Recent gravitational wave (GW) observations by LIGO/Virgo show evidence for hierarchical mergers, where the merging BHs are the remnants of previous BH merger events. These events may carry important clues about the astrophysical host environments of the GW sources. In this paper, we present the distributions of the effective spin parameter (χeff), the precession spin parameter (χp), and the chirp mass (mchirp) expected in hierarchical mergers. Under a wide range of assumptions, hierarchical mergers produce (i) a monotonic increase of the average of the typical total spin for merging binaries, which we characterize with χ¯typ≡(χ2eff+χ2p)1/2⁠, up to roughly the maximum mchirp among first-generation (1g) BHs, and (ii) a plateau at χ¯typ∼0.6 at higher mchirp. We suggest that the maximum mass and typical spin magnitudes for 1g BHs can be estimated from χ¯typ as a function of mchirp. The GW data observed in LIGO/Virgo O1–O3a prefers an increase in χ¯typ at low mchirp, which is consistent with the growth of the BH spin magnitude by hierarchical mergers at ∼2σ confidence. A Bayesian analysis using the χeff, χp, and mchirp distributions suggests that 1g BHs have the maximum mass of ∼15–30M⊙ if the majority of mergers are of high-generation BHs (not among 1g–1g BHs), which is consistent with mergers in active galactic nucleus discs and/or nuclear star clusters, while if mergers mainly originate from globular clusters, 1g BHs are favoured to have non-zero spin magnitudes of ∼0.3. We also forecast that signatures for hierarchical mergers in the χ¯typ distribution can be confidently recovered once the number of GW events increases to ≳ O(100).

Intermediate-luminosity red transients: Spectrophotometric properties and connection to electron-capture supernova explosions

(2021)

Authors:

Y-Z Cai, A Pastorello, M Fraser, MT Botticella, N Elias-Rosa, L-Z Wang, R Kotak, S Benetti, E Cappellaro, M Turatto, A Reguitti, S Mattila, SJ Smartt, C Ashall, S Benitez, T-W Chen, A Harutyunyan, E Kankare, P Lundqvist, PA Mazzali, A Morales-Garoffolo, P Ochner, G Pignata, SJ Prentice, TM Reynolds, X-W Shu, MD Stritzinger, L Tartaglia, G Terreran, L Tomasella, S Valenti, G Valerin, G-J Wang, X-F Wang, L Borsato, E Callis, G Cannizzaro, S Chen, E Congiu, M Ergon, L Galbany, A Gal-Yam, X Gao, M Gromadzki, S Holmbo, F Huang, C Inserra, K Itagaki, Z Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, K Maguire, S Margheim, S Moran, F Onori, A Sagués Carracedo, KW Smith, J Sollerman, A Somero, B Wang, DR Young

Southern African Large Telescope Spectroscopy of BL Lacs for the CTA project

(2021)

Authors:

E Kasai, P Goldoni, M Backes, G Cotter, S Pita, C Boisson, DA Williams, F D'Ammando, E Lindfors, U Barres de Almeida, W Max-Moerbeck, V Navarro-Aranguiz, J Becerra-Gonzalez, O Hervet, J-P Lenain, H Sol, S Wagner

TeV emission of galactic plane sources with HAWC and H.E.S.S.

Astrophysical Journal IOP Publishing 917:1 (2021) 6

Authors:

H Abdalla, F Aharonian, F Ait Benkhali, Thomas Armstrong, G Cotter, J Davies

Abstract:

The High Altitude Water Cherenkov (HAWC) observatory and the High Energy Stereoscopic System (H.E.S.S.) are two leading instruments in the ground-based very-high-energy γ-ray domain. HAWC employs the water Cherenkov detection (WCD) technique, while H.E.S.S. is an array of Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes (IACTs). The two facilities therefore differ in multiple aspects, including their observation strategy, the size of their field of view, and their angular resolution, leading to different analysis approaches. Until now, it has been unclear if the results of observations by both types of instruments are consistent: several of the recently discovered HAWC sources have been followed up by IACTs, resulting in a confirmed detection only in a minority of cases. With this paper, we go further and try to resolve the tensions between previous results by performing a new analysis of the H.E.S.S. Galactic plane survey data, applying an analysis technique comparable between H.E.S.S. and HAWC. Events above 1 TeV are selected for both data sets, the point-spread function of H.E.S.S. is broadened to approach that of HAWC, and a similar background estimation method is used. This is the first detailed comparison of the Galactic plane observed by both instruments. H.E.S.S. can confirm the γ-ray emission of four HAWC sources among seven previously undetected by IACTs, while the three others have measured fluxes below the sensitivity of the H.E.S.S. data set. Remaining differences in the overall γ-ray flux can be explained by the systematic uncertainties. Therefore, we confirm a consistent view of the γ-ray sky between WCD and IACT techniques.