Skip to main content
Home
Department Of Physics text logo
  • Research
    • Our research
    • Our research groups
    • Our research in action
    • Research funding support
    • Summer internships for undergraduates
  • Study
    • Undergraduates
    • Postgraduates
  • Engage
    • For alumni
    • For business
    • For schools
    • For the public
Menu
forecast-based-attribution-schematic
Credit: Nicholas Leach 2022

Dr Nicholas Leach

Senior Postdoctoral Research Assistant in Weather & Climate Impacts on Health

Research theme

  • Climate physics

Sub department

  • Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics

Research groups

  • Predictability of weather and climate
nicholas.leach@physics.ox.ac.uk
Atmospheric Physics Clarendon Laboratory, room 117
ORCiD profile.
Personal website.
Github profile.
Google scholar profile.
  • About
  • Publications

Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 1: introduction and evaluation of global-mean temperature response

Geoscientific Model Development Copernicus Publications 13:11 (2020) 5175-5190

Authors:

Zebedee RJ Nicholls, Malte Meinshausen, Jared Lewis, Robert Gieseke, Dietmar Dommenget, Kalyn Dorheim, Chen-Shuo Fan, Jan S Fuglestvedt, Thomas Gasser, Ulrich Golüke, Philip Goodwin, Corinne Hartin, Austin P Hope, Elmar Kriegler, Nicholas J Leach, Davide Marchegiani, Laura A McBride, Yann Quilcaille, Joeri Rogelj, Ross J Salawitch, Bjørn H Samset, Marit Sandstad, Alexey N Shiklomanov, Ragnhild B Skeie, Christopher J Smith, Steve Smith, Katsumasa Tanaka, Junichi Tsutsui, Zhiang Xie
More details from the publisher

Anthropogenic influence on the 2018 summer warm spell in Europe: the impact of different spatio-temporal scales

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society American Meteorological Society 101:S1 (2020) S41-S46

Authors:

Nicholas Leach, S Li, S Sparrow, GJ Van Oldenborgh, FC Lott, A Weisheimer, Allen

Abstract:

We demonstrate that, in attribution studies, events defined over longer time scales generally produce higher probability ratios due to lower interannual variability, reconciling seemingly inconsistent attribution results of Europe’s 2018 summer heatwaves in reported studies.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details

Pathways to Sustainable Land-Use and Food Systems in the United Kingdom by 2050

Chapter in Pathways to Sustainable Land-Use and Food Systems, 2020 Report of the FABLE Consortium, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) and the Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) (2020) 626-655

Authors:

ALISON SMITH, Nicholas LEACH, Paula Harrison, Saher HASNAIN, Charles Godfray, Jim HALL, Michael OBERSTEINER

Abstract:

This chapter of the 2020 Report of the FABLE Consortium Pathways to Sustainable Land-Use and Food Systems outlines how sustainable food and land-use systems can contribute to raising climate ambition, aligning climate mitigation and biodiversity protection policies, and achieving other sustainable development priorities in the UK. It presents three pathways for food and land-use systems for the period 2020-2050: Current Trends, Sustainable Medium Ambition, and Sustainable High Ambition (referred to as “Current Trends”, “Sustainable”, and “Sustainable +” in all figures throughout this chapter). These pathways examine the trade-offs between achieving the FABLE Targets under limited land availability and constraints to balance supply and demand at national and global levels. We developed these pathways in consultation with national stakeholders and experts, including from the Department for Food, Agriculture and Rural Affairs (Defra), the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), the Department for International Trade (DIT), the Department for Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs in Northern Ireland (DAERA), the Scottish Government, the Welsh Government, the Committee on Climate Change, the Royal Society, the Royal Academy of Engineering, and UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), and modeled them with the FABLE Calculator (Mosnier, Penescu, Thomson, and Perez-Guzman, 2019). See Annex 1 for more details on the adaptation of the model to the national context.
More details from the publisher

Current level and rate of warming determine emissions budgets under ambitious mitigation

Nature Geoscience Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 11 (2018) 574-579

Authors:

Nicholas Leach, Richard J Millar, Karsten Haustein, Stuart Jenkins, Euan Graham, Myles R Allen

Abstract:

Some of the differences between recent estimates of the remaining budget of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C arise from different estimates of the level of warming to date relative to pre-industrial conditions, but not all. Here we show that, for simple geometrical reasons, the combination of both the level and rate of human-induced warming provides a remarkably accurate prediction of remaining emission budgets to peak warming across a broad range of scenarios, if budgets are expressed in terms of CO2-forcing-equivalent emissions. These in turn predict CO2 emissions budgets if (but only if) the fractional contribution of non-CO2 drivers to warming remains approximately unchanged, as it does in some ambitious mitigation scenarios, indicating a best-estimate remaining budget for 1.5 °C of about 22 years’ current emissions from mid-2017, with a ‘likely’ (1 standard error) range of 13–32 years. This provides a simple, transparent and model-independent metric of progress towards an ambitious temperature stabilization goal that could be used to inform the Paris Agreement stocktake process. It is less applicable to less ambitious goals. Alternative definitions of current warming and scenarios for non-CO2 drivers give lower 1.5 °C budgets. Lower budgets based on the MAGICC simple modelling system widely used in integrated assessment studies reflect its relatively high simulated current warming rates.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details
More details

FAIR v1.3: a simple emissions-based impulse response and carbon cycle model

Geoscientific Model Development Copernicus Publications 11:6 (2018) 2273-2297

Authors:

Christopher J Smith, Piers M Forster, Myles Allen, Nicholas Leach, Richard J Millar, Giovanni A Passerello, Leighton A Regayre
More details from the publisher

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Prev
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Current page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Footer Menu

  • Contact us
  • Giving to the Dept of Physics
  • Work with us
  • Media

User account menu

  • Log in

Follow us

FIND US

Clarendon Laboratory,

Parks Road,

Oxford,

OX1 3PU

CONTACT US

Tel: +44(0)1865272200

University of Oxfrod logo Department Of Physics text logo
IOP Juno Champion logo Athena Swan Silver Award logo

© University of Oxford - Department of Physics

Cookies | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement

Built by: Versantus

  • Home
  • Research
  • Study
  • Engage
  • Our people
  • News & Comment
  • Events
  • Our facilities & services
  • About us
  • Current students
  • Staff intranet