Skip to main content
Home
Department Of Physics text logo
  • Research
    • Our research
    • Our research groups
    • Our research in action
    • Research funding support
    • Summer internships for undergraduates
  • Study
    • Undergraduates
    • Postgraduates
  • Engage
    • For alumni
    • For business
    • For schools
    • For the public
Menu
Juno Jupiter image

David Marshall

Professor of Physical Oceanography

Research theme

  • Climate physics

Sub department

  • Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics

Research groups

  • Physical oceanography
David.Marshall@physics.ox.ac.uk
Telephone: 01865 (2)72099
Robert Hooke Building, room F47
my personal webpage (external)
  • About
  • Publications

Surface factors controlling the volume of accumulated Labrador Sea Water

Ocean Science Copernicus Publications 20:2 (2024) 521-547

Authors:

Yavor Kostov, Marie-José Messias, Herlé Mercier, David Marshall, Helen L Johnson

Abstract:

We explore historical variability in the volume of Labrador Sea Water (LSW) using ECCO, an ocean state estimate configuration of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology general circulation model (MITgcm). The model’s adjoint, a linearization of the MITgcm, is set up to output the lagged sensitivity of the watermass volume to surface boundary conditions. This allows us to reconstruct the evolution of LSW volume over recent decades using historical surface wind stress, heat, and freshwater fluxes. Each of these boundary conditions contributes significantly to the LSW variability that we recover, but these impacts are associated with different geographical fingerprints and arise over a range of time lags. We show that the volume of LSW accumulated in the Labrador Sea exhibits a delayed response to surface wind stress and buoyancy forcing outside the convective interior of the Labrador Sea, at key locations in the North Atlantic Ocean. In particular, winds and surface density anomalies affect the North Atlantic Current’s (NAC) transport of warm and saline subtropical water masses that are precursors for the formation of LSW. This propensity for a delayed response of LSW to remote forcing allows us to predict a substantial fraction of LSW variability at least a year into the future. Our analysis also enables us to attribute LSW variability to different boundary conditions and to gain insight into the major mechanisms that drive volume anomalies in this deep watermass. We point out the important role of buoyancy loss and preconditioning along the NAC pathway, in the Iceland Basin, the Irminger Sea, and the Nordic Seas, processes which facilitate the formation of LSW both in the Irminger and in the Labrador Sea.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details

Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Southern Ocean Ventilation

Geophysical Research Letters American Geophysical Union (AGU) 51:4 (2024)

Authors:

Andrew F Styles, Graeme A MacGilchrist, Michael J Bell, David P Marshall
More details from the publisher
More details

Destratifying and restratifying instabilities during down-front wind events: a case study in the Irminger Sea

Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans American Geophysical Union 129:2 (2024) e2023JC020365

Authors:

Fraser Goldsworth, Helen L Johnson, David Marshall, Isabela Alexander-Astiz Le Bras

Abstract:

Observations indicate that symmetric instability is active in the East Greenland Current during strong northerly wind events. Theoretical considerations suggest that mesoscale baroclinic instability may also be enhanced during these events. An ensemble of idealized numerical ocean models forced with northerly winds shows that the short time-scale response (from 10 days to 3 weeks) to the increased baroclinicity of the flow is the excitation of symmetric instability, which sets the potential vorticity of the flow to zero. The high latitude of the current means that the zero potential vorticity state has low stratification, and symmetric instability destratifies the water column. On longer time scales (greater than 4 weeks), baroclinic instability is excited and the associated slumping of isopycnals restratifies the water column. Eddy-resolving models that fail to resolve the submesoscale should consider using submesoscale parameterizations to prevent the formation of overly stratified frontal systems following down-front wind events. The mixed layer in the current deepens at a rate proportional to the square root of the time-integrated wind stress. Peak water mass transformation rates vary linearly with the time-integrated wind stress. Mixing rates saturate at high wind stresses during wind events of a fixed duration which means increasing the peak wind stress in an event leads to no extra mixing. Using ERA5 reanalysis data we estimate that between 0.9 Sv and 1.0 Sv of East Greenland Coastal Current Waters are produced by mixing with lighter surface waters during wintertime due to down-front wind events. Similar amounts of East Greenland-Irminger Current water are produced.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details

Spatial and temporal patterns of Southern Ocean ventilation

Geophysical Research Letters Wiley 51:4 (2024) e2023GL106716

Authors:

Andrew Styles, Graeme MacGilchrist, Mike Bell, David Marshall

Abstract:

Ocean ventilation translates atmospheric forcing into the ocean interior. The Southern Ocean is an important ventilation site for heat and carbon and is likely to influence the outcome of anthropogenic climate change. We conduct an extensive backwards-in-time trajectory experiment to identify spatial and temporal patterns of ventilation. Temporally, almost all ventilation occurs between August and November. Spatially, “hotspots” of ventilation account for 60% of open-ocean ventilation on a 30 years timescale; the remaining 40% ventilates in a circumpolar pattern. The densest waters ventilate on the Antarctic shelf, primarily near the Antarctic Peninsula (40%) and the west Ross sea (20%); the remaining 40% is distributed across East Antarctica. Shelf-ventilated waters experience significant densification outside of the mixed layer.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA

Scale-awareness in an eddy energy constrained mesoscale eddy parameterization

Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems American Geophysical Union 15:12 (2023) e2023MS003886

Authors:

Julian Mak, James R Maddison, David P Marshall, X Ruan, Y Wang, L Yeow

Abstract:

There is an increasing interest in mesoscale eddy parameterizations that are scale-aware, normally interpreted to mean that a parameterization does not require parameter recalibration as the model resolution changes. Here we examine whether Gent–McWilliams (GM) based version of GEOMETRIC, a mesoscale eddy parameterization that is constrained by a parameterized eddy energy budget, is scale-aware in its energetics. It is generally known that GM-based schemes severely damp out explicit eddies, so the parameterized component would be expected to dominate across resolutions, and we might expect a negative answer to the question of energetic scale-awareness. A consideration of why GM-based schemes damp out explicit eddies leads a suggestion for what we term a splitting procedure: a definition of a “large-scale” field is sought, and the eddy-induced velocity from the GM-scheme is computed from and acts only on the large-scale field, allowing explicit and parameterized components to co-exist. Within the context of an idealized re-entrant channel model of the Southern Ocean, evidence is provided that the GM-based version of GEOMETRIC is scale-aware in the energetics as long as we employ a splitting procedure. The splitting procedure also leads to an improved representation of mean states without detrimental effects on the explicit eddy motions.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Prev
  • Page 1
  • Current page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • …
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Footer Menu

  • Contact us
  • Giving to the Dept of Physics
  • Work with us
  • Media

User account menu

  • Log in

Follow us

FIND US

Clarendon Laboratory,

Parks Road,

Oxford,

OX1 3PU

CONTACT US

Tel: +44(0)1865272200

University of Oxfrod logo Department Of Physics text logo
IOP Juno Champion logo Athena Swan Silver Award logo

© University of Oxford - Department of Physics

Cookies | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement

Built by: Versantus

  • Home
  • Research
  • Study
  • Engage
  • Our people
  • News & Comment
  • Events
  • Our facilities & services
  • About us
  • Current students
  • Staff intranet