The SAMI Galaxy Survey: a statistical approach to an optimal classification of stellar kinematics in galaxy surveys

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 505:2 (2021) 3078-3106

Authors:

Jesse van de Sande, Sam P Vaughan, Luca Cortese, Nicholas Scott, Joss Bland-Hawthorn, Scott M Croom, Claudia DP Lagos, Sarah Brough, Julia J Bryant, Julien Devriendt, Yohan Dubois, Francesco D'Eugenio, Caroline Foster, Amelia Fraser-McKelvie, Katherine E Harborne, Jon S Lawrence, Sree Oh, Matt S Owers, Adriano Poci, Rhea-Silvia Remus, Samuel N Richards, Felix Schulze, Sarah M Sweet, Mathew R Varidel, Charlotte Welker

Abstract:

Large galaxy samples from multi-object IFS surveys now allow for a statistical analysis of the z~0 galaxy population using resolved kinematics. However, the improvement in number statistics comes at a cost, with multi-object IFS surveys more severely impacted by the effect of seeing and lower signal-to-noise. We present an analysis of ~1800 galaxies from the SAMI Galaxy Survey and investigate the spread and overlap in the kinematic distributions of the spin parameter proxy $\lambda_{Re}$ as a function of stellar mass and ellipticity. For SAMI data, the distributions of galaxies identified as regular and non-regular rotators with $kinemetry$ show considerable overlap in the $\lambda_{Re}$-$\varepsilon_e$ diagram. In contrast, visually classified galaxies (obvious and non-obvious rotators) are better separated in $\lambda_{Re}$ space, with less overlap of both distributions. Then, we use a Bayesian mixture model to analyse the $\lambda_{Re}$-$\log(M_*/M_{\odot})$ distribution. As a function of mass, we investigate whether the data are best fit with a single kinematic distribution or with two. Below $\log(M_*/M_{\odot})$~10.5 a single beta distribution is sufficient to fit the complete $\lambda_{Re}$ distribution, whereas a second beta distribution is required above $\log(M_*/M_{\odot})$~10.5 to account for a population of low-$\lambda_{Re}$ galaxies, presenting the cleanest separation of the two populations. We apply the same analysis to mock-observations from cosmological simulations. The mixture model predicts a bimodal $\lambda_{Re}$ distribution for all simulations, albeit with different positions of the $\lambda_{Re}$ peaks and with different ratios of both populations. Our analysis validates the conclusions from previous, smaller IFS surveys, but also demonstrates the importance of using kinematic selection criteria that are dictated by the quality of the observed or simulated data.

The growth of density perturbations in the last $\sim$10 billion years from tomographic large-scale structure data

(2021)

Authors:

Carlos García-García, Jaime Ruiz Zapatero, David Alonso, Emilio Bellini, Pedro G Ferreira, Eva-Maria Mueller, Andrina Nicola, Pilar Ruiz-Lapuente

Probing galaxy bias and intergalactic gas pressure with KiDS Galaxies-tSZ-CMB lensing cross-correlations

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences (2021)

Authors:

Z Yan, L van Waerbeke, T Tröster, Ah Wright, D Alonso, M Asgari, M Bilicki, T Erben, S Gu, C Heymans, H Hildebrandt, G Hinshaw, N Koukoufilippas, A Kannawadi, K Kuijken, et al

Abstract:

We constrain the redshift dependence of gas pressure bias $\left\langle b_{y} P_{\mathrm{e}}\right\rangle$ (bias-weighted average electron pressure), which characterises the thermodynamics of intergalactic gas, through a combination of cross-correlations between galaxy positions and the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich (tSZ) effect, as well as galaxy positions and the gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). The galaxy sample is from the fourth data release of the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS). The tSZ $y$ map and the CMB lensing map are from the {\textit{Planck}} 2015 and 2018 data releases, respectively. The measurements are performed in five redshift bins with $z\lesssim1$. With these measurements, combining galaxy-tSZ and galaxy-CMB lensing cross-correlations allows us to break the degeneracy between galaxy bias and gas pressure bias, and hence constrain them simultaneously. In all redshift bins, the best-fit values of $\bpe$ are at a level of $\sim 0.3\, \mathrm{meV/cm^3}$ and increase slightly with redshift. The galaxy bias is consistent with unity in all the redshift bins. Our results are not sensitive to the non-linear details of the cross-correlation, which are smoothed out by the {\textit{Planck}} beam. Our measurements are in agreement with previous measurements as well as with theoretical predictions. We also show that our conclusions are not changed when CMB lensing is replaced by galaxy lensing, which shows the consistency of the two lensing signals despite their radically different redshift ranges. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using CMB lensing to calibrate the galaxy distribution such that the galaxy distribution can be used as a mass proxy without relying on the precise knowledge of the matter distribution.

Deep learning for automatic segmentation of the nuclear envelope in electron microscopy data, trained with volunteer segmentations

Traffic Wiley 22:7 (2021) 240-253

Authors:

Helen Spiers, Harry Songhurst, Luke Nightingale, Joost de Folter, Roger Hutchings, Christopher J Peddie, Anne Weston, Amy Strange, Steve Hindmarsh, Christopher Lintott, Lucy M Collinson, Martin L Jones

Abstract:

Advancements in volume electron microscopy mean it is now possible to generate thousands of serial images at nanometre resolution overnight, yet the gold standard approach for data analysis remains manual segmentation by an expert microscopist, resulting in a critical research bottleneck. Although some machine learning approaches exist in this domain, we remain far from realizing the aspiration of a highly accurate, yet generic, automated analysis approach, with a major obstacle being lack of sufficient high-quality ground-truth data. To address this, we developed a novel citizen science project, Etch a Cell, to enable volunteers to manually segment the nuclear envelope (NE) of HeLa cells imaged with serial blockface scanning electron microscopy. We present our approach for aggregating multiple volunteer annotations to generate a high-quality consensus segmentation and demonstrate that data produced exclusively by volunteers can be used to train a highly accurate machine learning algorithm for automatic segmentation of the NE, which we share here, in addition to our archived benchmark data.

The Simons Observatory: Bandpass and polarization-angle calibration requirements for B-mode searches

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics IOP Publishing (2021)

Authors:

Maximilian H Abitbol, David Alonso, Sara M Simon, Jack Lashner, Kevin T Crowley, Aamir M Ali, Susanna Azzoni, Carlo Baccigalupi, Darcy Barron, Michael L Brown, Erminia Calabrese, Julien Carron, Yuji Chinone, Jens Chluba, Gabriele Coppi, Kevin D Crowley, Mark Devlin, Jo Dunkley, Josquin Errard, Valentina Fanfani, Nicholas Galitzki, Martina Gerbino, J Colin Hill, Bradley R Johnson, Brian Keating

Abstract:

We quantify the calibration requirements for systematic uncertainties on bandpasses and polarization angles for next-generation ground-based observatories targeting the large-angle $B$-mode polarization of the Cosmic Microwave Background, with a focus on the Simons Observatory (SO). We explore uncertainties on bandpass gain calibration, center frequencies, and polarization angles, including the frequency variation of the latter across the bandpass. We find that bandpass calibration factors and center frequencies must be known to percent levels or less to avoid biases on the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ on the order of $\Delta r\sim10^{-3}$, in line with previous findings. Polarization angles must be calibrated to the level of a few tenths of a degree, while their frequency variation between the edges of the band must be known to ${\cal O}(10)$ degrees. Given the tightness of these calibration requirements, we explore the level to which residual uncertainties on these systematics would affect the final constraints on $r$ if included in the data model and marginalized over. We find that the additional parameter freedom does not degrade the final constraints on $r$ significantly, broadening the error bar by ${\cal O}(10\%)$ at most. We validate these results by reanalyzing the latest publicly available data from the BICEP2 / Keck Array collaboration within an extended parameter space covering both cosmological, foreground and systematic parameters. Finally, our results are discussed in light of the instrument design and calibration studies carried out within SO.