JADES NIRSpec initial data release for the Hubble Ultra Deep Field

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 690 (2024) a288

Authors:

Andrew J Bunker, Alex J Cameron, Emma Curtis-Lake, Peter Jakobsen, Stefano Carniani, Mirko Curti, Joris Witstok, Roberto Maiolino, Francesco D’Eugenio, Tobias J Looser, Chris Willott, Nina Bonaventura, Kevin Hainline, Hannah Übler, Christopher NA Willmer, Aayush Saxena, Renske Smit, Stacey Alberts, Santiago Arribas, William M Baker, Stefi Baum, Rachana Bhatawdekar, Rebecca AA Bowler, Kristan Boyett, Stephane Charlot, Zuyi Chen, Jacopo Chevallard, Chiara Circosta, Christa DeCoursey, Anna de Graaff, Eiichi Egami, Daniel J Eisenstein, Ryan Endsley, Pierre Ferruit, Giovanna Giardino, Ryan Hausen, Jakob M Helton, Raphael E Hviding, Zhiyuan Ji, Benjamin D Johnson, Gareth C Jones, Nimisha Kumari, Isaac Laseter, Nora Lützgendorf, Michael V Maseda, Erica Nelson, Eleonora Parlanti, Michele Perna, Bernard J Rauscher, Tim Rawle, Hans-Walter Rix, Marcia Rieke, Brant Robertson, Bruno Rodríguez Del Pino, Lester Sandles, Jan Scholtz, Katherine Sharpe, Maya Skarbinski, Daniel P Stark, Fengwu Sun, Sandro Tacchella, Michael W Topping, Natalia C Villanueva, Imaan EB Wallace, Christina C Williams, Charity Woodrum

The ALMA-CRISTAL survey

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 690 (2024) a197

Authors:

Ikki Mitsuhashi, Ken-ichi Tadaki, Ryota Ikeda, Rodrigo Herrera-Camus, Manuel Aravena, Ilse De Looze, Natascha M Förster Schreiber, Jorge González-López, Justin Spilker, Roberto J Assef, Rychard Bouwens, Loreto Barcos-Munoz, Jack Birkin, Rebecca AA Bowler, Gabriela Calistro Rivera, Rebecca Davies, Elisabete Da Cunha, Tanio Díaz-Santos, Andrea Ferrara, Deanne B Fisher, Lilian L Lee, Juno Li, Dieter Lutz, Monica Relaño, Thorsten Naab, Marco Palla, Ana Posses, Manuel Solimano, Linda Tacconi, Hannah Übler, Stefan van der Giessen, Sylvain Veilleux

Euclid preparation

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 690 (2024) ARTN A30

Authors:

F Dournac, A Blanchard, S Ilić, B Lamine, I Tutusaus, A Amara, S Andreon, N Auricchio, H Aussel, M Baldi, S Bardelli, C Bodendorf, D Bonino, E Branchini, S Brau-Nogue, M Brescia, J Brinchmann, S Camera, V Capobianco, J Carretero, S Casas, M Castellano, S Cavuoti, A Cimatti, G Congedo, Cj Conselice, L Conversi, Y Copin, F Courbin, Hm Courtois, A Da Silva, H Degaudenzi, Am Di Giorgio, J Dinis, M Douspis, F Dubath, X Dupac, S Dusini, A Ealet, M Farina, S Farrens, S Ferriol, M Frailis, E Franceschi, S Galeotta, W Gillard, B Gillis, C Giocoli, Br Granett, A Grazian

Abstract:

Future data provided by the Euclid mission will allow us to better understand the cosmic history of the Universe. A metric of its performance is the figure-of-merit (FoM) of dark energy, usually estimated with Fisher forecasts. The expected FoM has previously been estimated taking into account the two main probes of Euclid, namely the three-dimensional clustering of the spectroscopic galaxy sample, and the so-called 3×2pt signal from the photometric sample (i.e., the weak lensing signal, the galaxy clustering, and their cross-correlation). So far, these two probes have been treated as independent. In this paper, we introduce a new observable given by the ratio of the (angular) two-point correlation function of galaxies from the two surveys. For identical (normalised) selection functions, this observable is unaffected by sampling noise, and its variance is solely controlled by Poisson noise. We present forecasts for Euclid where this multi-tracer method is applied and is particularly relevant because the two surveys will cover the same area of the sky. This method allows for the exploitation of the combination of the spectroscopic and photometric samples. When the correlation between this new observable and the other probes is not taken into account, a significant gain is obtained in the FoM, as well as in the constraints on other cosmological parameters. The benefit is more pronounced for a commonly investigated modified gravity model, namely the γ parametrisation of the growth factor. However, the correlation between the different probes is found to be significant and hence the actual gain is uncertain. We present various strategies for circumventing this issue and still extract useful information from the new observable.

Dwarf galaxies as a probe of a primordially magnetized Universe

Astronomy and Astrophysics EDP Sciences 690 (2024) A59

Authors:

Mahsa Sanati, Sergio Martin-Alvarez, Jennifer Schober, Yves Revaz, Adrianne Slyz, Julien Devriendt

Abstract:

Aims: The true nature of primordial magnetic fields (PMFs) and their role in the formation of galaxies still remains elusive. To shed light on these unknowns, we investigate their impact by varying two sets of properties: (i) accounting for the effect of PMFs on the initial matter power spectrum, and (ii) accounting for their magneto-hydrodynamical effects on the formation of galaxies. By comparing both we can determine the dominant agent in shaping galaxy evolution.

Methods: We use the magneto-hydrodynamics code RAMSES, to generate multiple new zoom-in simulations for eight different host halos of dwarf galaxies across a wide luminosity range of 103 − 106 L⊙. These halos are selected from a ΛCDM cosmological box, tracking their evolution down to redshift z = 0. We explore a variety of primordial magnetic field (comoving) strengths Bλ ranging from 0.05 to 0.50 nG.

Results: We find magnetic fields in the interstellar medium not only modify star formation in dwarf spheroidal galaxies but also completely prevent the formation of stars in less compact ultra-faints with halo mass and stellar mass below ∼ 2.5 · 109 and 3 · 106 M⊙, respectively. At high redshifts, the impact of PMFs on host halos of dwarf galaxies through the modification of the matter power spectrum is more dominant than the influence of magneto-hydrodynamics in shaping their gaseous structure. Through the amplification of small perturbations ranging in mass from 107 to 109 M⊙ in the ΛCDM+PMFs matter power spectrum, primordial fields expedite the formation of the first dark matter halos, leading to an earlier onset and a higher star formation rate at redshifts z > 12. We investigate the evolution of various energy components and demonstrate that magnetic fields with an initial strength of Bλ ≥ 0.05 nG exhibit a strong growth of magnetic energy, accompanied by a saturation phase, that starts quickly after the growth phase. These trends persist consistently, regardless of the initial conditions, whether it is the classical ΛCDM or modified by PMFs. Lastly, we investigate the impact of PMFs on the present-time observable properties of dwarf galaxies, namely, the half light radius, V-band luminosity, mean metallicity and velocity dispersion profile. We find that PMFs with moderate strengths of Bλ ≤ 0.10 nG show great agreement with the scaling relations of the observed Local group dwarfs. However, stronger fields lead to large sizes and high velocity dispersion.

The Effects of Bar Strength and Kinematics on Galaxy Evolution: Slow Strong Bars Affect Their Hosts the Most

The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 973:2 (2024) 129

Authors:

Tobias Géron, RJ Smethurst, Chris Lintott, Karen L Masters, IL Garland, Petra Mengistu, David O’Ryan, BD Simmons

Abstract:

We study how bar strength and bar kinematics affect star formation in different regions of the bar by creating radial profiles of EW[Hα] and Dn4000 using data from Sloan Digital Sky Survey-IV Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory (MaNGA). Bars in galaxies are classified as strong or weak using Galaxy Zoo DESI, and they are classified as fast and slow bars using the Tremaine–Weinberg method on stellar kinematic data from the MaNGA survey. In agreement with previous studies, we find that strong bars in star-forming (SF) galaxies have enhanced star formation in their center and beyond the bar-end region, while star formation is suppressed in the arms of the bar. This is not found for weakly barred galaxies, which have very similar radial profiles to unbarred galaxies. In addition, we find that slow bars in SF galaxies have significantly higher star formation along the bar than fast bars. However, the global star formation rate is not significantly different between galaxies with fast and slow bars. This suggests that the kinematics of the bar do not affect star formation globally, but changes where star formation occurs in the galaxy. Thus, we find that a bar will influence its host the most if it is both strong and slow.