Impact of star formation models on the growth of simulated galaxies at high redshifts

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 693 (2024) ARTN A149

Authors:

Cheonsu Kang, Taysun Kimm, Daniel Han, Harley Katz, Julien Devriendt, Adrianne Slyz, Romain Teyssier

Abstract:

<jats:p>Star formation is a key process that governs the baryon cycle within galaxies, however, the question of how it controls their growth remains elusive due to modeling uncertainties. To understand the impact of star formation models on galaxy evolution, we performed cosmological zoom-in radiation-hydrodynamic simulations of a dwarf dark matter halo, with a virial mass of <jats:italic>M</jats:italic><jats:sub>vir</jats:sub> ∼ 10<jats:sup>9</jats:sup> <jats:italic>M</jats:italic><jats:sub>⊙</jats:sub> at <jats:italic>z</jats:italic> = 6. We compared two different star formation models: a multi-freefall model combined with a local gravo-thermo-turbulent condition and a more self-consistent model based on a sink particle algorithm, where gas accretion and star formation are directly controlled by the gas kinematics. As the first study in this series, we used cosmological zoom-in simulations with different spatial resolutions and found that star formation is more bursty in the runs with the sink algorithm, generating stronger outflows than in the runs with the gravo-thermo-turbulent model. The main reason for the increased burstiness is that the gas accretion rates on the sinks are high enough to form stars on very short timescales, leading to more clustered star formation. As a result, the star-forming clumps are disrupted more quickly in the sink run due to more coherent radiation and supernova feedback. The difference in burstiness between the two star formation models becomes even more pronounced when the supernova explosion energy is artificially increased. Our results suggest that improving the modeling of star formation on small, sub-molecular cloud scales can significantly impact the global properties of simulated galaxies.</jats:p>

The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Semi-Analytic Covariance Matrices for the DR6 CMB Power Spectra

(2024)

Authors:

Zachary Atkins, Zack Li, David Alonso, J Richard Bond, Erminia Calabrese, Adriaan J Duivenvoorden, Jo Dunkley, Serena Giardiello, Carlos Hervías-Caimapo, J Colin Hill, Hidde T Jense, Joshua Kim, Michael D Niemack, Lyman Page, Adrien La Posta, Thibaut Louis, Kavilan Moodley, Thomas W Morris, Sigurd Naess, Cristóbal Sifón, Edward J Wollack

Through the Citizen Scientists’ Eyes: Insights into Using Citizen Science with Machine Learning for Effective Identification of Unknown-Unknowns in Big Data

Citizen Science Theory and Practice Ubiquity Press 9:1 (2024) 40

Authors:

Kameswara Bharadwaj Mantha, Hayley Roberts, Lucy Fortson, Chris Lintott, Hugh Dickinson, William Keel, Ramanakumar Sankar, Coleman Krawczyk, Brooke Simmons, Mike Walmsley, Izzy Garland, Jason Shingirai Makechemu, Laura Trouille, Clifford Johnson

Mass octupole and current quadrupole corrections to gravitational wave emission from close hyperbolic encounters

Classical and Quantum Gravity IOP Publishing 41:23 (2024) 235002-235002

Authors:

Alexander Roskill, Marienza Caldarola, Sachiko Kuroyanagi, Savvas Nesseris

Abstract:

Abstract In this paper, we study the next-to-leading order corrections in the mass multipole expansion, i.e. the mass octupole and current quadrupole, to gravitational wave production by close hyperbolic encounters of compact objects. We find that the signal is again, as in the simple quadrupole case, a burst event with the majority of the released energy occurring during the closest approach. In particular, we investigate the relative contribution to the power, both in the time and frequency domains, and total energy emitted by each order in the mass multipole expansion in gravitational waves. To do so, we include in the quadrupole term its first order post-Newtonian correction, giving this a contribution to the power of the same order as that of the mass octupole and the current quadrupole. We find specific configurations of systems where these corrections could be important and should be taken into account when analysing burst events.

Black hole spin evolution across cosmic time from the NewHorizon simulation

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) 536:2 (2024) stae2595

Authors:

Rs Beckmann, Y Dubois, M Volonteri, Ca Dong-Paez, S Peirani, Jm Piotrowska, G Martin, K Kraljic, J Devriendt, C Pichon, Sk Yi

Abstract:

<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title> <jats:p>Astrophysical black holes (BHs) have two fundamental properties: mass and spin. While the mass-evolution of BHs has been extensively studied, much less work has been done on predicting the distribution of BH spins. In this paper, we present the spin evolution for a sample of intermediate-mass and massive BHs from the NewHorizon simulation, which evolved BH spin across cosmic time in a full cosmological context through gas accretion, BH–BH mergers and BH feedback including jet spindown. As BHs grow, their spin evolution alternates between being dominated by gas accretion and BH mergers. Massive BHs are generally highly spinning. Accounting for the spin energy extracted through the Blandford–Znajek mechanism increases the scatter in BH spins, especially in the mass range $10^{5}{-}10^{7}\,\rm M_\odot$, where BHs had previously been predicted to be almost universally maximally spinning. We find no evidence for spin-down through efficient chaotic accretion. As a result of their high spin values, massive BHs have an average radiative efficiency of $\lt \varepsilon _{\rm r}^{\rm thin}\gt \approx 0.19$. As BHs spend much of their time at low redshift with a radiatively inefficient thick disc, BHs in our sample remain hard to observe. Different observational methods probe different sub-populations of BHs, significantly influencing the observed distribution of spins. Generally, X-ray-based methods and higher luminosity cuts increase the average observed BH spin. When taking BH spin evolution into account, BHs inject, on average, between three times (in quasar mode) and eight times (in radio mode) as much feedback energy into their host galaxy as previously assumed.</jats:p>