Three‐dimensional turbulence‐resolving modeling of the Venusian cloud layer and induced gravity waves
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. 122:1 (2016) 134-149
Abstract:
The impact of the cloud convective layer of the atmosphere of Venus on the global circulation remains unclear. The recent observations of gravity waves at the top of the cloud by the Venus Express mission provided some answers. These waves are not resolved at the scale of global circulation models (GCM); therefore, we developed an unprecedented 3‐D turbulence‐resolving large‐eddy simulations (LES) Venusian model using the Weather Research and Forecast terrestrial model. The forcing consists of three different heating rates: two radiative ones for solar and infrared and one associated with the adiabatic cooling/warming of the global circulation. The rates are extracted from the Laboratoire de Météorlogie Dynamique Venus GCM using two different cloud models. Thus, we are able to characterize the convection and associated gravity waves in function of latitude and local time. To assess the impact of the global circulation on the convective layer, we used rates from a 1‐D radiative‐convective model. The resolved layer, taking place between 1.0 × 105 and 3.8 × 104 Pa (48–53 km), is organized as polygonal closed cells of about 10 km wide with vertical wind of several meters per second. The convection emits gravity waves both above and below the convective layer leading to temperature perturbations of several tenths of kelvin with vertical wavelength between 1 and 3 km and horizontal wavelength from 1 to 10 km. The thickness of the convective layer and the amplitudes of waves are consistent with observations, though slightly underestimated. The global dynamics heating greatly modify the convective layer.Simulation of stratospheric ozone in global forecast model using linear photochemistry parameterization
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences Springer Nature 52:5 (2016) 479-494
The Gulf Stream influence on wintertime North Atlantic jet variability
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society Wiley 143:702 (2016) 173-183
Abstract:
In this paper we investigate the influence of the Gulf Stream SST front on the North Atlantic eddy-driven jet and its variability, by analysing the NCEP-CFSR dataset and a pair of AGCM simulations forced with realistic and smoothed Gulf Stream SST boundary conditions. The Gulf Stream SST front acts to generate stronger meridional eddy heat flux in the lower-troposphere and an eddy-driven jet over the eastern North Atlantic that is located further polewards, compared to the simulation with smoothed SST. The strong Gulf Stream SST gradient is found to be crucial in more accurately capturing the trimodal distribution of the eddy-driven jet latitude, with the more poleward climatological jet being the result of the jet occupying the northern jet position more frequently in the simulation forced with observed SSTs. The more frequent occurence of the northern jet location is associated with periods of high eddy heat flux over the Gulf Stream region. Composite analysis of high eddy heat flux events reveals that the significantly higher heat flux is followed by larger and more persistient poleward jet excursions in the simulations with realistic SSTs compared to the simulation with smoothed SSTs, with upper-tropospheric eddy momentum fluxes acting to maintain the more poleward eddy-driven jet. Periods of high eddy heat flux over the Gulf Stream region are also shown to be associated with increased blocking frequency over Europe, which are clearly distinct from periods with a northern jet position.5 Things We Know to Be True.
Scientific American 315:5 (2016) 46-53
Diabatic heating and jet stream shifts: A case study of the 2010 negative North Atlantic Oscillation winter
Geophysical Research Letters (2016)