Climate dynamics

Abstract:

<jats:p>Abstract. The Atmospheric Processes And their Role in Climate (APARC) Quasi-Biennial Oscillation initiative (QBOi) has conducted new experiments to explore the modulation of the QBO by El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). This paper provides an overview of the experimental design and investigates the modulation of the QBO by ENSO using nine climate models used in QBOi. A key finding is a consistent lengthening of the QBO period during La Niña compared to El Niño across all models, aligning with observational evidence. Although several models simulate QBO periods that deviate from the observed mean of approximately 28 months, the relative difference between La Niña and El Niño remains interpretable within each model. The simulated QBO periods during La Niña tend to be longer than those during El Niño, although, in most models, the differences are small compared to that observed. However, the magnitude of this lengthening shows large inter-model differences. By contrast, even the sign of the ENSO effect on QBO amplitude varies among models. Models employing variable parameterized gravity wave sources generally exhibit greater sensitivity of the QBO amplitude to the presence of ENSO than those models using fixed sources. The models capture key observed ENSO-related characteristics, including a weaker Walker circulation and increased equatorial precipitation during El Niño compared to La Niña, as well as a characteristic response in zonal mean zonal wind and temperature. All models also simulate stronger equatorial tropical upwelling in El Niño compared to La Niña up to ∼ 10 hPa, consistent with ERA5 reanalysis. These modulations influence the propagation and filtering of gravity waves. Notably, models with variable parameterized gravity wave sources show stronger wave forcing during El Niño, potentially explaining the shorter QBO period modulation in these models. Further investigation into the complex interplay between ENSO, gravity waves, and the QBO can contribute to improved model formulations. </jats:p>

Abstract:

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Midlatitude storms transport warm and moist air poleward and upward, releasing latent heat. Latent heating is thus organized by the circulation but then modifies temperature gradients and winds, constituting a nonlinear feedback. We define the latent heating feedback as the effects that arise from latent heating being coupled with the circulation. Because of its nonlinearity, the climatic effects of this feedback are difficult to isolate and remain poorly understood. By decoupling latent heating from the circulation in an atmospheric general circulation model, we show that the latent heating feedback enhances storm track eddy diffusivity, modifying eddy heat fluxes beyond changes in mean baroclinicity. Simultaneously, tracked storms occur at lower latitudes, intensify more, and propagate further poleward, while the subtropical jet strengthens as coupled latent heating preserves lower latitude baroclinicity. The feedback response supports the idea that diabatic effects cause the “too zonal, too equatorward” storm track biases in climate models.</jats:p>

Abstract:

This study examines the role of Asian summer monsoon in the unprecedented 2021 Pacific Northwest (PNW) heatwave. We address this by separating it into two relevant but independent questions: Can monsoon activity observed prior to the event impact PNW climate, and did it specifically impact the 2021 PNW heatwave? Based on observational diagnostics, numerical experiments, and subseasonal‐to‐seasonal (S2S) forecasts, our results consistently indicate although the monsoon activity can exert a cooling effect on the PNW, on average, it had a warming influence in the specific case of 2021 and thus contributed to the heatwave that summer. The contrasting answers to the “can it” and “did it” questions highlight how background flow and specific forcing pattern during the event can modulate—or even reverse—the expected impact. We advocate future work exploring the link between large‐scale climatic drivers and extremes should be undertaken in an event‐specific context to better understand these relationships. The Pacific Northwest (PNW) experienced a record‐breaking heatwave during the summer of 2021, resulting in significant adverse effects on both human society and ecosystems. A heavy rainfall band was observed stretching from south China to south of Japan 1 week prior to the heatwave, fueling the debate over whether the monsoon activity contributed to this event. Our study found that while the monsoon activity typically has a cooling effect on the PNW's climate, in this particular year, it had a warming effect and thus contributed to this specific heatwave. This unusual warming effect was driven by a stronger and more northward‐shifted Pacific jet stream, which altered the extratropical response to the monsoon, resulting in an anticyclonic pattern over the PNW instead of the typical cyclonic response seen under average climatic conditions. Therefore, it is important to distinguish between the general question of whether monsoon can influence such events on average, and the specific question of whether it did in any specific case. We argue that when discussing the influence of large‐scale climate drivers on extremes, it is crucial to clearly state whether the focus is on the general potential for influence or on the specific role in a particular event. Anomalous Asian monsoon activity like that observed in late June 2021 can exert a cooling effect over the Pacific Northwest on average However, in the case of 2021, anomalous monsoon activity had a warming influence, contributing to the extreme Pacific Northwest heatwave Confusing the “can it” and “did it” questions could lead to contradictions on how the monsoon or other large‐scale drivers affect extremes Anomalous Asian monsoon activity like that observed in late June 2021 can exert a cooling effect over the Pacific Northwest on average However, in the case of 2021, anomalous monsoon activity had a warming influence, contributing to the extreme Pacific Northwest heatwave Confusing the “can it” and “did it” questions could lead to contradictions on how the monsoon or other large‐scale drivers affect extremes

Abstract:

Evidence has emerged of a discrepancy in tropical Pacific sea surface temperature (SST) trends over the satellite era, where most coupled climate models struggle to simulate the observed La Niña-like SST trends. Here we highlight wider implications of the tropical Pacific SST trend discrepancy for global circulation trends during boreal winter, using two complementary methods to constrain coupled model SST trends: conditioning near-term climate prediction (hindcast) simulations, and pacemaking coupled climate simulations. The robust circulation trend response to constraining the tropical Pacific SST trend resembles the interannual La Niña response. Constraining tropical Pacific SST robustly reduces tropical tropospheric warming, improving agreement with reanalyses, and moderately shifts the zonal-mean jets poleward. It also improves surface air temperature and precipitation trends in ENSO-sensitive regions, such as the Americas, South Asia, and southern Africa. Our results underline the importance of tropical Pacific SST for achieving confidence in multidecadal model projections.

Abstract:

Abstract Initialised hindcasts inherit knowledge of the observed climate state, so studies of multidecadal trends in seasonal and decadal hindcast models have focused on the ensemble-mean when benchmarking against observed trends. However, this neglects the role of short-timescale variability in contributing to longer-term trends, and hence trend errors. Using a single-model coupled hindcast ensemble, we generate a distribution of 10,000 hindcast trends over 1981-2022 by randomly sampling a single ensemble member in each year. We find that the hindcast model supports a wide range of trends in various features of the large-scale climate, even when sampled at leads of just 1-3 months following initialisation. The spread in hindcast global surface temperature trends is equivalent to approximately a sixth of the total observed warming over the same period, driven by large seasonal variability of temperatures over land. The hindcasts also lend support for observed poleward jet shifts, but the magnitude of the shifts varies widely across the ensemble. Our results show that a fair comparison of hindcast trends to observations should consider the full range of model trends, not only the ensemble mean. More broadly, we argue that the hindcast trend distribution offers a largely untapped tool for studying multidecadal climate trends in a very large ensemble, through exploiting existing hindcast data.