Winter and Summer Northern Hemisphere Blocking in CMIP5 Models

Journal of Climate 26:18 (2013) 7044-7059

Authors:

G Masato, BJ Hoskins, T Woollings

Abstract:

The frequencies of atmospheric blocking in both winter and summer and the changes in them from the twentieth to the twenty-first centuries as simulated in 12 models from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) are analyzed. The representative concentration pathway 8.5 (RCP8.5) high emission scenario runs are used to represent the twenty-first century. The analysis is based on the wavebreaking methodology of Pelly and Hoskins. It differs from the Tibaldi and Molteni index in viewing equatorward cutofflows and poleward blocking highs in equal manner as indicating a disruption to the westerlies. One-dimensional and two-dimensional diagnostics are applied to identify blocking of the midlatitude storm track and also at higher latitudes. Winter blocking frequency is found to be generally underestimated. The models give a decrease in the European blocking maximum in the twenty-first century, consistent with the results in other studies. There is a mean twenty-first-century winter poleward shift of high-latitude blocking but little agreement between the models on the details. In summer, Eurasian blocking is also underestimated in the models, whereas it is now too large over the high-latitude ocean basins. A decrease in European blocking frequency in the twenty-first-century model runs is again found. However, in summer there is a clear eastward shift of blocking over eastern Europe and western Russia, in a region close to the blocking that dominated the Russian summer of 2010. While summer blocking decreases in general, the poleward shift of the storm track into the region of frequent high-latitude blocking may mean that the incidence of storms being obstructed by blocks may actually increase. © 2013 American Meteorological Society.

Nonlinear Phenomena in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences

Springer, 2013

Authors:

George Carnevale, Raymond T Pierrehumbert

Abstract:

This IMA Volume in Mathematics and its Applications NONLINEAR PHENOMENA IN ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCES is based on the proceedings of a workshop which was an integral part of the 1989-90 IMA program on "Dynamical Systems and their ...

The extreme European summer 2012

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 94:9 (2013) S28-S32

Authors:

B Dong, R Sutton, T Woollings

Hot climates, high sensitivity

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110:35 (2013) 14118-14119

Behaviour of the winter North Atlantic eddy-driven jet stream in the CMIP3 integrations

Climate Dynamics 41:3-4 (2013) 995-1007

Authors:

A Hannachi, EA Barnes, T Woollings

Abstract:

A systematic analysis of the winter North Atlantic eddy-driven jet stream latitude and wind speed from 52 model integrations, taken from the coupled model intercomparison project phase 3, is carried out and compared to results obtained from the ERA-40 reanalyses. We consider here a control simulation, twentieth century simulation, and two time periods (2046-2065 and 2081-2100) from a twenty-first century, high-emission A2 forced simulation. The jet wind speed seasonality is found to be similar between the twentieth century simulations and the ERA-40 reanalyses and also between the control and forced simulations although nearly half of the models overestimate the amplitude of the seasonal cycle. A systematic equatorward bias of the models jet latitude seasonality, by up to 7°, is observed, and models additionally overestimate the seasonal cycle of jet latitude about the mean, with the majority of the models showing equatorward and poleward biases during the cold and warm seasons respectively. A main finding of this work is that no GCM under any forcing scenario considered here is able to simulate the trimodal behaviour of the observed jet latitude distribution. The models suffer from serious problems in the structure of jet variability, rather than just quantitiative errors in the statistical moments. © 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.