The 2dF galaxy redshift survey: The environmental dependence of galaxy star formation rates near clusters
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 334:3 (2002) 673-683
Abstract:
We have measured the equivalent width of the Ha emission line for 11 006 galaxies brighter than Mb, = -19 (ΩΛ = 0.7, Ωm = 0.3, H0 = 70 km s-1 Mpc-1) at 0.05 < z < 0.1 in the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS), in the fields of 17 known galaxy clusters. The limited redshift range ensures that our results are insensitive to aperture bias, and to residuals from night sky emission lines. We use these measurements to trace μ*, the star formation rate normalized to L*, as a function of distance from the cluster centre, and local projected galaxy density. We find that the distribution of μ* steadily skews toward larger values with increasing distance from the cluster centre, converging to the field distribution at distances greater than ∼3 times the virial radius. A correlation between star formation rate and local projected density is also found, which is independent of cluster velocity dispersion and disappears at projected densities below ∼1 galaxy Mpc-2 (brighter than Mb, = -19). This characteristic scale corresponds approximately to the mean density at the cluster virial radius. The same correlation holds for galaxies more than two virial radii from the cluster centre. We conclude that environmental influences on galaxy properties are not restricted to cluster cores, but are effective in all groups where the density exceeds this critical value. The present-day abundance of such systems, and the strong evolution of this abundance, makes it likely that hierarchical growth of structure plays a significant role in decreasing the global average star formation rate. Finally, the low star formation rates well beyond the virialized cluster rule out severe physical processes, such as ram pressure stripping of disc gas, as being completely responsible for the variations in galaxy properties with environment.Integral Field Spectroscopy with the Gemini Multiobject Spectrograph.I. Design, Construction, and Testing
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific IOP Publishing 114:798 (2002) 892-912
The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: the environmental dependence of galaxy star formation rates near clusters
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 334 (2002) 673-683
Kinematics of Galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field South: Discovery of a Very Massive Spiral at z=0.6
ArXiv astro-ph/0207457 (2002)
Abstract:
We report the first results from a study of the internal kinematics, based on spatially resolved H_alpha velocity profiles, of three galaxies at redshift z~0.6 and one at redshift z~0.8, detected by ISOCAM in the Hubble Deep Field South. The kinematics are derived from high resolution near-infrared VLT spectroscopy. One of the galaxies is a massive spiral which possesses a very large rotational velocity of 460 km/s and contains a mass of 10^12 M_solar (within 20 kpc), significantly higher than the dynamical masses measured in most other local and high redshift spirals. Two of the galaxies comprise a counter-rotating interacting system, while the fourth is also a large spiral. The observed galaxies are representative examples of the morphologies encountered among ISOCAM galaxies. The mass-to-light (M /L_bol) ratios of ISOCAM galaxies lie between those of local luminous IR galaxies and massive spirals. We measure an offset of 1.6+/-0.3 mag in the rest frame B-band and of 0.7+/-0.3 mag in the rest frame I-band when we compare the four ISOCAM galaxies to the local Tully-Fisher B and I-band relations. We conclude that the large IR luminosity of the ISOCAM population results from a combination of large mass and efficient triggering of star formation. Since ISOCAM galaxies contribute significantly to the Cosmic Infrared Background our results imply that a relatively small number of very massive and IR luminous objects contribute significantly to the IR background and star formation activity near z~0.7.Ultr-Luminous Infrared Galaxies: QSOs in Formation?
ArXiv astro-ph/0207405 (2002)