Galaxy formation and evolution

Abstract:

We present the first measurement of the H I mass function (HIMF) using data from MeerKAT, based on 276 direct detections from the MeerKAT International GigaHertz Tiered Extragalactic Exploration (MIGHTEE) Survey Early Science data covering a period of approximately a billion years (0 ≤ z ≤ 0.084). This is the first HIMF measured using interferometric data over non-group or cluster field, i.e. a deep blank field. We constrain the parameters of the Schechter function that describes the HIMF with two different methods: 1/Vmax and modified maximum likelihood (MML). We find a low-mass slope α=−1.29+0.37−0.26 , ‘knee’ mass log10(M∗/M⊙)=10.07+0.24−0.24 and normalization log10(ϕ∗/Mpc−3)=−2.34+0.32−0.36 (H0 = 67.4 km s−1 Mpc−1) for 1/Vmax , and α=−1.44+0.13−0.10 , ‘knee’ mass log10(M∗/M⊙)=10.22+0.10−0.13 and normalization log10(ϕ∗/Mpc−3)=−2.52+0.19−0.14 for MML. When using 1/Vmax we find both the low-mass slope and ‘knee’ mass to be consistent within 1σ with previous studies based on single-dish surveys. The cosmological mass density of H I is found to be slightly larger than previously reported: ΩHI=5.46+0.94−0.99×10−4h−167.4 from 1/Vmax and ΩHI=6.31+0.31−0.31×10−4h−167.4 from MML but consistent within the uncertainties. We find no evidence for evolution of the HIMF over the last billion years.

Abstract:

This is the first paper in our series on the combined analysis of the Dynamics and stellar Population (DynPop) for the MaNGA survey in the final SDSS Data Release 17 (DR17). Here, we present a catalogue of dynamically determined quantities for over 10 000 nearby galaxies based on integral-field stellar kinematics from the MaNGA survey. The dynamical properties are extracted using the axisymmetric Jeans Anisotropic Modelling (JAM) method, which was previously shown to be the most accurate for this kind of study. We assess systematic uncertainties using eight dynamical models with different assumptions. We use two orientations of the velocity ellipsoid: either cylindrically aligned JAM_cyl or spherically aligned JAM_sph. We also make four assumptions for the models’ dark versus luminous matter distributions: (1) mass-follows-light, (2) free NFW dark halo, (3) cosmologically constrained NFW halo, (4) generalized NFW dark halo, i.e. with free inner slope. In this catalogue, we provide the quantities related to the mass distributions (e.g. the density slopes and enclosed mass within a sphere of a given radius for total mass, stellar mass, and dark matter mass components). We also provide the complete models which can be used to compute the full luminous and mass distribution of each galaxy. Additionally, we visually assess the qualities of the models to help with model selections. We estimate the observed scatter in the measured quantities which decreases as expected with improvements in quality. For the best data quality, we find a remarkable consistency of measured quantities between different models, highlighting the robustness of the results.