Anisotropic mass segregation: two-component mean-field model

(2023)

Authors:

Hanxi Wang, Bence Kocsis

EDGE: The shape of dark matter haloes in the faintest galaxies

(2023)

Authors:

Matthew DA Orkney, Ethan Taylor, Justin I Read, Martin P Rey, Andrew Pontzen, Oscar Agertz, Stacy Y Kim, Maxime Delorme

JADES: Discovery of extremely high equivalent width Lyman-alpha emission from a faint galaxy within an ionized bubble at z=7.3

(2023)

Authors:

Aayush Saxena, Brant E Robertson, Andrew J Bunker, Ryan Endsley, Alex J Cameron, Stephane Charlot, Charlotte Simmonds, Sandro Tacchella, Joris Witstok, Chris Willott, Stefano Carniani, Emma Curtis-Lake, Pierre Ferruit, Peter Jakobsen, Santiago Arribas, Jacopo Chevallard, Mirko Curti, Francesco D'Eugenio, Anna De Graaff, Gareth C Jones, Tobias J Looser, Michael V Maseda, Tim Rawle, Hans-Walter Rix, Bruno Rodríguez Del Pino, Renske Smit, Hannah Übler, Daniel J Eisenstein, Kevin Hainline, Ryan Hausen, Benjamin D Johnson, Marcia Rieke, Christina C Williams, Christopher NA Willmer, William M Baker, Rachana Bhatawdekar, Rebecca Bowler, Kristan Boyett, Zuyi Chen, Eiichi Egami, Zhiyuan Ji, Erica Nelson, Michele Perna, Lester Sandles, Jan Scholtz, Irene Shivaei

The Art of Measuring Physical Parameters in Galaxies: A Critical Assessment of Spectral Energy Distribution Fitting Techniques

The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 944:2 (2023) 141-141

Authors:

Camilla Pacifici, Kartheik G Iyer, Bahram Mobasher, Elisabete da Cunha, Viviana Acquaviva, Denis Burgarella, Gabriela Calistro Rivera, Adam C Carnall, Yu-Yen Chang, Nima Chartab, Kevin C Cooke, Ciaran Fairhurst, Jeyhan Kartaltepe, Joel Leja, Katarzyna Małek, Brett Salmon, Marianna Torelli, Alba Vidal-García, Médéric Boquien, Gabriel G Brammer, Michael JI Brown, Peter L Capak, Jacopo Chevallard, Chiara Circosta, Darren Croton

Abstract:

Abstract The study of galaxy evolution hinges on our ability to interpret multiwavelength galaxy observations in terms of their physical properties. To do this, we rely on spectral energy distribution (SED) models, which allow us to infer physical parameters from spectrophotometric data. In recent years, thanks to wide and deep multiwave band galaxy surveys, the volume of high-quality data have significantly increased. Alongside the increased data, algorithms performing SED fitting have improved, including better modeling prescriptions, newer templates, and more extensive sampling in wavelength space. We present a comprehensive analysis of different SED-fitting codes including their methods and output with the aim of measuring the uncertainties caused by the modeling assumptions. We apply 14 of the most commonly used SED-fitting codes on samples from the CANDELS photometric catalogs at z ∼ 1 and z ∼ 3. We find agreement on the stellar mass, while we observe some discrepancies in the star formation rate (SFR) and dust-attenuation results. To explore the differences and biases among the codes, we explore the impact of the various modeling assumptions as they are set in the codes (e.g., star formation histories, nebular, dust and active galactic nucleus models) on the derived stellar masses, SFRs, and A V values. We then assess the difference among the codes on the SFR–stellar mass relation and we measure the contribution to the uncertainties by the modeling choices (i.e., the modeling uncertainties) in stellar mass (∼0.1 dex), SFR (∼0.3 dex), and dust attenuation (∼0.3 mag). Finally, we present some resources summarizing best practices in SED fitting.

Nitrogen enhancements 440 Myr after the Big Bang: super-solar N/O, a tidal disruption event or a dense stellar cluster in GN-z11?

ArXiv 2302.10142 (2023)

Authors:

Alex J Cameron, Harley Katz, Martin P Rey, Aayush Saxena