Galaxy Zoo CEERS: Bar Fractions Up to z ∼ 4.0

The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 987:1 (2025) 74

Authors:

Tobias Géron, RJ Smethurst, Hugh Dickinson, LF Fortson, Izzy L Garland, Sandor Kruk, Chris Lintott, Jason Shingirai Makechemu, Kameswara Bharadwaj Mantha, Karen L Masters, David O’Ryan, Hayley Roberts, BD Simmons, Mike Walmsley, Antonello Calabrò, Rimpei Chiba, Luca Costantin, Maria R Drout, Francesca Fragkoudi, Yuchen Guo, BW Holwerda, Shardha Jogee, Anton M Koekemoer, Ray A Lucas

Abstract:

We study the evolution of the bar fraction in disk galaxies between 0.5 < z < 4.0 using multiband colored images from JWST Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey (CEERS). These images were classified by citizen scientists in a new phase of the Galaxy Zoo (GZ) project called GZ CEERS. Citizen scientists were asked whether a strong or weak bar was visible in the host galaxy. After considering multiple corrections for observational biases, we find that the bar fraction decreases with redshift in our volume-limited sample (n = 398); from 25−4+6 % at 0.5 < z < 1.0 to 3−1+6 % at 3.0 < z < 4.0. However, we argue it is appropriate to interpret these fractions as lower limits. Disentangling real changes in the bar fraction from detection biases remains challenging. Nevertheless, we find a significant number of bars up to z = 2.5. This implies that disks are dynamically cool or baryon dominated, enabling them to host bars. This also suggests that bar-driven secular evolution likely plays an important role at higher redshifts. When we distinguish between strong and weak bars, we find that the weak bar fraction decreases with increasing redshift. In contrast, the strong bar fraction is constant between 0.5 < z < 2.5. This implies that the strong bars found in this work are robust long-lived structures, unless the rate of bar destruction is similar to the rate of bar formation. Finally, our results are consistent with disk instabilities being the dominant mode of bar formation at lower redshifts, while bar formation through interactions and mergers is more common at higher redshifts.

The JWST Emission Line Survey (JELS): an untargeted search for H α emission line galaxies at z > 6 and their physical properties

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 541:2 (2025) 1348-1376

Authors:

CA Pirie, PN Best, KJ Duncan, DJ McLeod, RK Cochrane, M Clausen, JS Dunlop, SR Flury, JE Geach, CL Hale, E Ibar, R Kondapally, Zefeng Li, J Matthee, RJ McLure, L Ossa-Fuentes, AL Patrick, Ian Smail, D Sobral, HMO Stephenson, JP Stott, AM Swinbank

Abstract:

We present the first results of the JWST Emission Line Survey (JELS). Utilizing the first NIRCam narrow-band imaging at 4.7 m, over 63 arcmin in the PRIMER/COSMOS field, we have identified 609 emission line galaxy candidates. From these, we robustly selected 35 H star-forming galaxies at , with H star-formation rates () of . Combining our unique H sample with the exquisite panchromatic data in the field, we explored their physical properties and star-formation histories, and compared these to a broad-band selected sample at which has offered vital new insights into the nature of high-redshift galaxies. UV-continuum slopes () were considerably redder for our H sample () compared to the broad-band sample (). This was not due to dust attenuation as our H sample was relatively dust-poor (median ); instead, we argue that the reddened slopes could be due to nebular continuum. We compared and the UV-continuum-derived to SED-fitted measurements averaged over canonical time-scales of 10 and 100 Myr ( and ). We found an increase in recent SFR for our sample of H emitters, particularly at lower stellar masses (). We also found that strongly traces SFR averaged over 10 Myr time-scales, whereas the UV-continuum overpredicts SFR on 100 Myr time-scales at low stellar masses. These results point to our H sample undergoing ‘bursty’ star formation. Our F356W sample showed a larger scatter in across all stellar masses, which has highlighted how narrow-band photometric selections of H emitters are key to quantifying the burstiness of star-formation activity.

Thermal electrons in the radio afterglow of relativistic tidal disruption event ZTF22aaajecp/AT2022cmc

(2025)

Authors:

Lauren Rhodes, Ben Margalit, Joe S Bright, Hannah Dykaar, Rob Fender, David A Green, Daryl Haggard, Assaf Horesh, Alexander J van der Horst, Andrew Hughes, Kunal Mooley, Itai Sfaradi, David Titterington, David WIlliams-Baldwin

Hi intensity mapping with the MIGHTEE Survey: first results of the Hi power spectrum

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 541:1 (2025) 476-493

Authors:

Aishrila Mazumder, Laura Wolz, Zhaoting Chen, Sourabh Paul, Mario G Santos, Matt Jarvis, Junaid Townsend, Srikrishna Sekhar, Russ Taylor

Abstract:

We present the first results of the H i intensity mapping power spectrum analysis with the MeerKAT International GigaHertz Tiered Extragalactic Exploration (MIGHTEE) survey. We use data covering 4 square degrees in the COSMOS field using a frequency range of 962.5–1008.42 MHz, equivalent to H i emission in . The data consist of 15 pointings with a total of 94.2 h on-source. We verify the suitability of the MIGHTEE data for H i intensity mapping by testing for residual systematics across frequency, baselines, and pointings. We also vary the window used for H i signal measurements and find no significant improvement using stringent Fourier mode cuts. We compute the H i power spectrum at scales in autocorrelation as well as cross-correlation between observational scans using power spectrum domain averaging for pointings. We report consistent upper limits of 29.8 mK Mpc from the 2 cross-correlation measurements and 25.82 mK Mpc from autocorrelation at 2 Mpc.The low signal-to-noise ratio in this data potentially limits our ability to identify residual systematics, which will be addressed in the future by incorporating more data in the analysis.

MIGHTEE-HI: The direct detection of neutral hydrogen in galaxies at $z>0.25$

(2025)

Authors:

Matt J Jarvis, Madalina N Tudorache, I Heywood, Anastasia A Ponomareva, M Baes, Natasha Maddox, Kristine Spekkens, Andreea Varasteanu, CL Hale, Mario G Santos, RG Varadaraj, Elizabeth AK Adams, Alessandro Bianchetti, Barbara Catinella, Jacinta Delhaize, M Maksymowicz-Maciata, Pavel E Mancera Piña, Hengxing Pan, Amélie Saintonge, Gauri Sharma, O Ivy Wong